Establishment In Meltdown Mode: Impeachment, Coup, And Suicide?!

Posted by Lisa Haven | Dec 21, 2018 | Featured, USA

Not one, but two ‘events’ being orchestrated by the Trump administration are causing the leftist establishment to meltdown! For starters, the resignation by Secretary of Defense James Mattis has left many in the establishment speaking of impeachment, coups, and even suicide over fears that Mattis was the last ‘adult’ keeping President Trump in check. The other is that Trump is pulling US troops out of Syria and forging ahead with a withdrawal from Afghanistan. These two reports have literally rocked the establishment, the media, Democrats, and even some Republicans and it is sending them into full panic mode. All that and more below… For More Information See:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/20/us/politics/afghanistan-troop-withdrawal.html 

:: 12-21-18 Tsarizm :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

The Hi-Tech Traditionalist: Is America’s Military Loyal To Its Commander In Chief?

by Baruch Pletner,PhD,MBADecember 21, 2018

:: 12-21-18 Jihad Watch :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

How Canada protects Sharia

Dec 21, 2018 11:09 am By Robert Spencer

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/12/how-canada-protects-sharia 

:: 12-21-18 Natural News :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

BIOSLUDGE is a toilet-to-farm scheme that deposits toxic sewage sludge on food crops all across America

Friday, December 21, 2018 by: Lance D Johnson

(Natural News) There’s a reason why the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has implemented a Clean Water Act and a Clean Air Act, but NO Clean Soil Act. A Clean Soil Act would fundamentally change how wastewater is processed and recycled. It would require the EPA come clean about the toxic composition of fertilizers being spread on North American soils. A Clean Soil Act would halt the mass spread of toxic sewage on food crops all across America. It would expose environmental crimes within the EPA itself. A Clean Soil Act would require the truth to come out; that the recycling of bio-solids is a toilet-to-farm scheme that is poisoning America’s gardens and farmlands and forcing humans to eat from their own waste. The bio-solids that are processed and recycled at municipal wastewater treatment plants are sold to homes and farms across the country as “fertilizers.” These bio-solids are a chemical nightmare, consisting of a wide array of pharmaceuticals, agro-chemicals, industrial chemicals, household chemicals, pathogenic material, and heavy metals. This toxic biosludge should never come in contact with soils that grow food for human and animal consumption. (Related: The government is lying about the safety of biosludge.) Documentary exposes deep truths about EPA fraud and the chemical poisoning of soils and the food supply In the new documentary Biosludged, scientific experts and whistle blowers break down what is happening to North American soils and how this mass pollution scheme is making people chronically ill and mentally lobotomized. In this documentary, former EPA scientist and whistle blower Dr. David Lewis reveals the shocking extent of the EPA’s criminal activities and scientific fraud. The fertilizer that people add to their soils is inundating crops with disease-promoting pathogens and a slew of chemicals that wreck havoc on the physiological processes of the human body. The documentary also warns that the food supply is at grave risk of being used as a vector for terrorist activity. A terrorist can flush massive amounts of chemicals into the sewage system, only to have it all recycled as fertilizer for use on crop fields. Sewage sludge could also be laced with bio-weapons and microorganisms that cause food poisoning and infectious disease. All the human dung that is deposited on food crops ultimately releases chemicals into the groundwater, too. People across the U.S. are literally regurgitating the toxic composition of their own poop, using water and fertilizer that has been poisoned over and over again. These biosludge chemicals directly affect brain function, immune function, and fertility. All the cancer marches and pink ribbon fundraisers should start to look at what’s going on with the food supply, how toxic human waste is re-consumed, poisoning the population into cancerous states. Watch the full documentary at BrighteonFilms.com and download the full movie files that you can openly share with others. Stay up-to-date on the “greatest environmental crime you’ve never heard” at Biosludge.News.

Q&A: Where is biometric technology heading next? Special

By Tim Sandle Dec 13, 2018 in Technology

2019: The Year Of Reckoning For Big Tech As State Legislation Proposes $75,000 Fine Per Censored Item For Platforms With 75 Million-Plus Users

By Susan Duclos - All News PipeLine December 21, 2018

As Facebook goes into damage control mode after a New York Times investigation revealed that on top of all the data breaches and scandals that have plagued the company over the last year, they also allowed companies such as Netflix and Spotify access to users' private messages, we note reports that Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook lost $19 billion from their 2018 stock slide, as users rate Facebook as the company least trusted with their personal data. In September Pew reported that Facebook had suffered a marked decline in active users since March, with 42 percent limiting their daily activity and engagement as scandal continued to roil the company and stocks throughout 2018. The more recent Pew survey also found that 26 percent said that they deleted the Facebook app from their phones. All this suggests that a substantial minority or even a majority of Facebook users have to some degree disengaged from the platform in the past year. It’s not entirely clear from the survey discussion whether there’s any overlap between those “taking a break” and those who deleted the app. In addition, a majority (54 percent) also reported adjusting their privacy settings. In December another pattern emerged with journalists deciding to make public announcements about deleting Facebook entirely, with Capitol Hill Correspondent, Kasie Hunt, highlighting her reasons in an announcement posted to her Facebook account before deleting her account, explaining how she doesn't trust Facebook anymore and that she would not be staying on the platform in 2019. At the end of her announcement she stated "And here's hoping Facebook doesn't bury this post because it links to this negative story," showing that while the "trust" issues is first and foremost, even the establishment media knows, even as many deny it, that Facebook does practice censorship on a regular basis. Hunt took a screen shot of her Facebook post to her followers, then shared it on Twitter with two words tagged to @Facebook's Twitter account, saying "I'm out."

2019: The Year Of Reckoning For Big Tech As State Legislation Proposes $75,000 Fine Per Censored Item For Platforms With 75 Million-Plus Users

By Susan Duclos - All News PipeLine

As Facebook goes into damage control mode after a New York Times investigation revealed that on top of all the data breaches and scandals that have plagued the company over the last year, they also allowed companies such as Netflix and Spotify access to users' private messages, we note reports that Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook lost $19 billion from their 2018 stock slide, as users rate Facebook as the company least trusted with their personal data. In September Pew reported that Facebook had suffered a marked decline in active users since March, with 42 percent limiting their daily activity and engagement as scandal continued to roil the company and stocks throughout 2018. The more recent Pew survey also found that 26 percent said that they deleted the Facebook app from their phones. All this suggests that a substantial minority or even a majority of Facebook users have to some degree disengaged from the platform in the past year. It’s not entirely clear from the survey discussion whether there’s any overlap between those “taking a break” and those who deleted the app. In addition, a majority (54 percent) also reported adjusting their privacy settings. In December another pattern emerged with journalists deciding to make public announcements about deleting Facebook entirely, with Capitol Hill Correspondent, Kasie Hunt, highlighting her reasons in an announcement posted to her Facebook account before deleting her account, explaining how she doesn't trust Facebook anymore and that she would not be staying on the platform in 2019. the end of her announcement she stated "And here's hoping Facebook doesn't bury this post because it links to this negative story," showing that while the "trust" issues is first and foremost, even the establishment media knows, even as many deny it, that Facebook does practice censorship on a regular basis. Hunt took a screen shot of her Facebook post to her followers, then shared it on Twitter with two words tagged to @Facebook's Twitter account, saying "I'm out." nt was not the only journalist announcing they were quitting Facebook either, as Jessica Valenti from Medium announced "Just deleted my FB account and it felt GREAT." Food and Travel writer Jacob Dean joined the exodus, stating "Deleted my @facebook account today. Feels good. A little scary too, which goes to show you how much emotional power the company has. Definitely the right decision though. #Facebook #DeleteFacebook." all Street Journal columnist Walt Mossberg took it a step further and announced he was not only quitting Facebook, but was also leaving Facebook-owned Instagram and Messenger, saying "my own values and the policies and actions of Facebook have diverged to the point where I’m no longer comfortable there." FACEBOOK IS NOT ALONE IN FACING THE UPCOMING TECH RECKONING Facebook is not the only Silicon Valley company facing a reckoning, as we see a new report at NewsBusters, where Google's YouTube "removed 58 million videos, 1.67 million channels, and 224 million comments," between July and September, for "violations including inappropriate content or spreading 'hate speech'." The problem with that is that YouTube partners with Southern Poverty Law Center, allowing them to determine what is and is not hate speech, while SPLC has a long history of labeling conservative and religious pro-life groups as "hate groups." Via NewsBusters: The Hill quoted an unnamed YouTube spokesman who confessed they removed “conspiracy theories targeted towards particular groups or people because those videos violate hate speech and harassment policies.” However, YouTube did not say who was responsible for flagging those videos or list the “conspiracy theories” that were removed. Many right-wing causes are treated by the left as conspiracy theories -- from disputing climate change to illegal immigration. Reuters reported that algorithms are being used to determine which videos should be taken down. It also noted that while Google (which owns YouTube) may have expanded to use more than 10,000 moderators “pre-screening every video [is] unfeasible.” MIT recently published a study about how algorithms are clearly biased based upon their creators’ worldviews, yet companies “show no interest in fixing the problem.” Human moderators turn out to be just as problematic, as proven on November 13th when a YouTube moderator mistook a famous World War 2 Era video mocking Nazis for pro-Nazi propaganda and took it down. Adam Green, The Public Domain Review’s editor in chief, found the situation farcical, shocked at how any moderator could have mistaken a clear satire for being pro-Nazi. As for Twitter, on December 20th, many Wikileaks staff and the main Wikileaks account, with over 5.4 million followers, were all locked and frozen, which was announced by Kristinn Hrafnsson, WikiLeaks editor-in-chief, who wasn't caught up in the lockouts, so she was able to inform followers. Twitter is also accused of shadow banning the Wikileaks accounts, via Caitlin Johnstone over at Medium: It is worth noting here that Dorsey has an established record of lying to Twitter users about the social media outlet’s censorship practices. In the lead-up to the 2016 election, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey was asked point-blank if Twitter was obstructing the #DNCLeaks from trending, a hashtag people were using to build awareness of the DNC emails which had just been published by WikiLeaks, and Dorsey flatly denied it. More than a year later, we learned from a prepared testimony before the Senate Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism by Twitter’s acting general counsel Sean J. Edgett that this was completely false and Twitter had indeed been doing exactly that to protect the interests of US political structures by sheltering the public from information allegedly gathered by Russian hackers.

And indeed, @wikileaks, @assangedefence, @wltaskforce, and @assangelegal are as of this writing so aggressively shadow banned that an advanced search for tweets by those accounts turns up not one single post by any of them. Twitter did eventually unfreeze the Wikileaks accounts, claiming "denial of service attack had been run against several WikiLeaks and Assange legal accounts to trigger looping security lockouts," but as highlighted before that update by Johnstone "Even if Twitter does end up restoring access to all or some of these accounts, the fact that the site would shut them down at all is deeply disturbing...." Agreed. REGULATE OR STRIP BIG TECH OF PROTECTIONS? We have seen two different arguments over how to rein in big techs data invasions and consership practices, abusing their platforms' powers, one side pushing for the regulation of companies by treating them as utilities and a modern day public square. There are persuasive arguments on both sides of the regulation proposals, both for and against. One of the arguments against regulation is that in a free market society, users should be the ones to "punish" big tech for their abuse of powers, their selling of private personal data they were trusted with, some argue. Government interference generally makes matters worse, not better. One of the arguments on the side of regulating big tech, comes from a Harvard report in September, which maintains that big tech companies seem to unable, and unwilling, to regulate themselves, to protect users data or to prevent their liberal bias from dictating what is censored and what is not. Related: Big Tech is in the crosshairs of regulation Many argue that as private companies they should be able to do whatever they want, despite the fact that courts have said that social media is a modern day public square where constitutional rights are applied. That argument is valid, except for the fact that these "private companies," are extended special protections under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Law. Those liability immunity protections are not extended to news outlets nor to other websites. Those protections are predicated on these big tech companies providing third party content, without editorial control, therefore they are not "publishers," they are simply a service that offers "a forum for a true diversity of political discourse, unique opportunities for cultural development, and myriad avenues for intellectual activity." Some argue that by applying their censorship in a biased manner, rather than with a set standard independent of political ideology, they are acting as publishers, therefore they should be held responsible for the content on their platforms because they are practicing editorial control. Representative Louie Gohmert has introduced a bill, H.R.7363, that would remove the liability protections from social media companies, and perhaps video platforms like YouTube. On December 20, 2018, Gohmert issues the following statement on his congressional website, under the headline "Gohmert Introduces Bill That Removes Liability Protections for Social Media Companies That Use Algorithms to Hide, Promote, or Filter User Content."

“Social media companies like Facebook, Twitter, and Google are now among the largest and most powerful companies in the world. More and more people are turning to a social media platform for news than ever before, arguably making these companies more powerful than traditional media outlets. Yet, social media companies enjoy special legal protections under Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934, protections not shared by other media. Instead of acting like the neutral platforms they claim to be in order obtain their immunity, these companies have turned Section 230 into a license to potentially defraud and defame with impunity.” “Representatives of social media companies have testified in Congressional hearings that they do not discriminate against or filter out conservative voices on their platforms. But for all their reassurances, the disturbing trend continues unabated. Employees from some of these companies have communicated their disgust for conservatives and discussed ways to use social media platforms and algorithms to silence and prevent income to conservatives.” “In one hearing, one of the internet social media executives indicated a desire to be treated like Fox News. Fox News does not have their immunity and this bill will fulfill that unwitting request. Since there still appears to be no sincere effort to stop this disconcerting behavior, it is time for social media companies to be liable for any biased and unethical impropriety of their employees as any other media company. If these companies want to continue to act like a biased medium and publish their own agendas to the detriment of others, they need to be held accountable.”

Call me cynical but Republicans have had control of the House of Representatives for the last two years and could have offered this type of proposed legislation much earlier, when there may have been a chance to get it passed, but to offer it now when the House is about to come under Democratic control, appears to be more of a "gesture," than legislation that has a chance of passing as is. The good news is that big tech has come under fire from both Republicans and Democrats, albeit for different reasons, but the ire coming from both sides of the political aisle against big tech, may be enough for them to find some type of compromise. They need to figure out something fast as the majority of the general public now backs calls for regulation, which could do more harm than good, depending on what that regulation entails. Interestingly, there does seem to be a third option. Rather than the federal government getting involved, or stripping big techs liability immunity on a federal level, a new proposal in Arkansas, called the "Stop Social Media Censorship Act," would allow civil legal action against social media giants that "delete or censor" content posted by users. The bill would be applied to social media sites with at least 75 million users, and allows a minimum civil damage fine of $75,000 for each post that's removed or censored through an algorithm or other means. Under the bill, social media sites are considered a public utility. Although the bill does seem to need some tweaking, as to where those operating the sites live and how it is applied, it is a third option which would negate federal interference, so it is something to keep our eyes on and to see if any other state moves towards the same type of legislation. BOTTOM LINE Silicon Valley has not had a good year and while Facebook has brought much of the extra scrutiny to the world of big tech, Google, YouTube and Twitter have also faced their share of criticisms during demand performances in front of Congress, where frankly they attempted to "justify" and deny their actions rather than offering options to fix the mistakes they have made, via their censorship practices. With both Republicans and Democrats, politicians and general users, frustrated and gunning for them for a variety of reasons, it looks like 2019 is going to be a year of reckoning for big tech. As well it should be. In the first video below, Douglas Murray discusses how liberals in big tech are starting to eat their own, and in the second video, we see that Arkansas is proposing legislation that would fine companies that have tens of millions of users, for every political or religious post they remove or censor.

http://allnewspipeline.com/Big_Tech_Faces_A_Reckoning.php 

:: 12-20-18 InformationLiberation :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Gohmert Introduces Bill to Remove Liability Protections For Biased Social Media Companies

Chris Menahan InformationLiberation Dec. 20, 2018

Texas congressman Louie Gohmert has introduced a bill to remove social media companies' "special legal protections" if they behave like biased publishers rather than neutral platforms. From Gohmert.house.gov, "Gohmert Introduces Bill That Removes Liability Protections for Social Media Companies That Use Algorithms to Hide, Promote, or Filter User Content": Rep. Louie Gohmert (TX-01) released the following statement regarding the introduction his bill, H.R.7363, that amends section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934: “Social media companies like Facebook, Twitter, and Google are now among the largest and most powerful companies in the world. More and more people are turning to a social media platform for news than ever before, arguably making these companies more powerful than traditional media outlets. Yet, social media companies enjoy special legal protections under Section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934, protections not shared by other media. Instead of acting like the neutral platforms they claim to be in order obtain their immunity, these companies have turned Section 230 into a license to potentially defraud and defame with impunity." “Representatives of social media companies have testified in Congressional hearings that they do not discriminate against or filter out conservative voices on their platforms. But for all their reassurances, the disturbing trend continues unabated. Employees from some of these companies have communicated their disgust for conservatives and discussed ways to use social media platforms and algorithms to silence and prevent income to conservatives.” “In one hearing, one of the internet social media executives indicated a desire to be treated like Fox News. Fox News does not have their immunity and this bill will fulfill that unwitting request. Since there still appears to be no sincere effort to stop this disconcerting behavior, it is time for social media companies to be liable for any biased and unethical impropriety of their employees as any other media company. If these companies want to continue to act like a biased medium and publish their own agendas to the detriment of others, they need to be held accountable.” This bill is a great first step towards reigning in these biased social media companies. Ryan Saavedra @RealSaavedra Apple CEO Tim Cook suggests it's "a sin" to not ban certain people from social media and technology platforms: "We only have one message for those who seek to push hate, division, and violence: You have no place on our platforms. You have no home here." 9,776 9:41 PM - Dec 3, 2018

The censorship they're carrying out now -- which is beyond anything George Orwell could even dream of -- is only just the beginning. ADL @ADL_NationalReplying to @ADL_National .@Tim_Cook embodies ADL's mission of fighting hate, and securing justice and fair treatment to all. His words inspire us to keep up the good fight. #NeverIsNow 41 3:41 PM - Dec 3, 2018

Berkeley activists are working with the ADL to create an artificial intelligence system to identify "hate speech" on social media and automatically censor everyone in real time: Mark Zuckerberg alluded to such a system in April when he testified to the Senate that he's "optimistic" that "artificial intelligence tools" will be able to flag "hate speech" immediately within five to ten years.

BuzzFeed News @BuzzFeedNews Zuckerberg says Facebook is working on AI that can monitor hate speech but determining what violates its rules is "very linguistically nuanced" 93 2:30 PM - Apr 10, 2018

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=59592 

:: 12-22-18 The Liberty Beacon :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

…Vaccine Found To Contain 65 Unknown-To-Science Compounds…

December 22, 2018 This article was posted by TLB Staff Analysis, HEALTH

By Catherine J. Frompovich

Vaccines are not what they are cracked up to be in more ways than one, most especially in scientific analyses and assays findings, according to a December 13, 2018 Italian research firm’s findings. Below are some rather astounding, plus frightening, data sets that must be taken seriously by all government health agencies, especially Inspectors General of the United States Health and Human Services, the CDC and FDA. In Infanrix Hexa we found chemical contamination from the manufacturing process or cross-contamination with other manufacturing lines; chemical toxins; bacterial peptide toxins; insoluble and indigestible macromolecule that reacts to the protein assay, but cannot be recognized by any protein databases. We have not found: Protein antigens of diphtheria toxoids, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, haemophylus influenzae B, Poliomyelitis 1-2-3; Formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde, phenoxyethanol, antibiotic residues indicated in the composition; However, this is what really should have the medical community “up in arms” about vaccine pseudo-consensus science: In Infanrix Hexa there are six antigens Tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis toxoids, D antigens of Poliomyelitis 1-2-3, hepatitis B proteins obtained with genetic engineering and Haemophylus polysaccharides chemically linked to tetanus toxoid as carrier. Toxoids are created by treatments with formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde that should remove toxicity keeping intact their ability to stimulate protective antibodies against original toxins. We were expecting to find the three toxoids and the other antigens not modified by treatment with formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde, to separate the antigens from each other and to be digestible by the enzyme specific for proteins (trypsin). We have found instead a real polymer, insoluble and indigestible, that we supposed to be the set of antigens chemically bound together (has to be defined if this is present as an aggregate of the individual antigens or a single macromolecule), on which we can find in literature partial information regarding the single antigens. This macromolecule could not be recognized in any way by the protein databases, and in fact it turned out to be a solid compound of an unknown chemical structure. Proteins solubility and their digestion (i.e. the capacity to divide them into small peptide fragments) are two typical proteins characteristics that not only makes it possible to study them through some specific analysis methods but are also fundamental for the interaction with the immune system to create protective antibodies, because if the protein structure is heavily altered from the original one, the new antibodies result completely different from those that are able to attack the original antibodies causing illnesses.
Since this polymer we have encountered, derived from the antigenic mix, is not only different for its spatial conformation but it’s chemically different, so we can state that we are not facing antigens similar to the original ones but in the form of a compound with an unknown and unpredictable toxicity and efficacy. Source: https://drive.google.com/file/d/128CfYaaJdMwhx5yvCGDRggl5GIKyfWrC/view  

According to Corvelva’s pdf above, we find the following incriminating scientific evidence pertaining to their investigative and assays findings: Amino acids were found Lactose anhydrous was found Water was found NO formaldehyde was detected/found NO vitamins were detected A weak ‘signal’ for the antibiotic Neomycin was found NONE of the actives for the combination DTaP vaccineInfanrix Hexawere found, i.e., No Diphtheria toxoid, Tetanus toxoid, Pertussis toxin, the very diseases the vaccine was designed to prevent and/or build ‘antibodies’ against! Filamentous Haemagglutinin adhesion not detected Haemophilus Influenzae B polysaccharide not detected Pertactin (PRN) not detected

Polyribosylribitol Phosphate (PRP) not detected Polymyxin non relivabile [untraceable]

It should be noted that in Batch #1 tested, there were 65 UNKNOWN compounds with only 35 known compounds! However, if we juxtapose the above findings with what the CDC publishes on its PinkBookList of Excipients, we find this: DTaP (Infanrix) Fenton medium containing a bovine extract, modified Latham medium derived from bovine casein, formaldehyde, modified Stainer-Scholte liquid medium, glutaraldehyde, aluminum hydroxide, sodium chloride, polysorbate 80 (Tween 80)

Source: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf  (June 2018, First page Vaccine Excipient & Media Summary Excipients Included in U.S. Vaccines, by Vaccine)

Children have been damaged and even died after the Infanrix Hexa vaccine, as confirmed in this report, which cites a further differing list of ‘ingredients’ from what was found by the Italian research group Corvelva. The above apparent differences in scientific information and findings confirm absolute needs for independent studies to be undertaken on all vaccines by a special investigative team appointed by the U.S. Congress as part of its oversight duties to evaluate the contents/ingredients—both known and unknown to science—that are present in vaccines given to day-old infants (Hepatitis B vaccine) and combination, multi-valent vaccines given at 2, 4 and 6 months when infants are most vulnerable to immune system damage, and those administered along the timeline of mandated vaccines for toddlers, teens, adults and senior citizens. There’s a serious vaccine science credibility factor that must be resolved NOW! Resource: Vaccinegate Infanrix Hexa

TRIPLETS all become autistic within hours of vaccination… see shocking video that has the vaccine industry doubling down on lies and disinfo

Sunday, December 23, 2018 by: Mike Adams

(Natural News) A VAXXED video that has been banned almost everywhere is going viral on Brighteon.com, the Youtube alternative video community for free speech on vaccines, GMOs, natural medicine and more. As the video shows below, healthy triplets all became autistic within hours of vaccination, once again demonstrating that vaccines cause autism. The parents, the McDowell family in Detroit, Michigan, have spoken out publicly against the horrific medical violence being committed against children every day across America through toxic vaccines. (See AutismTruthNews.com for more reporting on vaccines and autism.) The names of their three children, pictured above, are Richie, Robbie and Claire. All three children were vaccinated on the same day, and within hours, they all become severely autistic. In their own words: On June 25th, 2007, we brought them in for the [vaccine] shot… we went in at 10 am. All three. My daughter still has the mark on her leg from the shot… we did the boys as well. By noon, Claire shut completely off. It was as if she was blind, and deaf, and complete failure to thrive, from super super happy, smiley girl to… she had full blown eye contact, and she shut right down. All she did was stare at the ceiling. At 2:00 we watched Richie shut off. All his mama, dadda, and the furniture walking and everything just shut of. All the giggles, all the smiles, again failure to thrive. They lost all their reflexes… they stopped blinking, yawning, coughing, sneezing, they lost their startle reflex… that was 2:00. 

The power of the elements: Discover Colloidal Silver Mouthwash with quality, natural ingredients like Sangre de Drago sap, black walnut hulls, menthol crystals and more. Zero artificial sweeteners, colors or alcohol. Learn more at the Health Ranger Store and help support this news site. 

The worst was when we saw the final one shut down. We lost Robbie, he looked like he was hit by a bus. He had a stunned look on his face… he acted deaf, he lost his happiness. They were no longer engaged in anything or anyone. They lost their smiles. They never held hands again, never looked at each other again. (Crying) Vaccine injury is real. We were told is was genetic, then we were told there was no way three children were shut off on the same day… it was statistically impossible. We were told we could not sue anyone. No vaccine manufacturers could be sued. We found out [later] there was a vaccine injury court. They then told us we were too late, [we] only had three years to apply. See the full video on the only video community site that dares to publish vaccine truth videos without censorship, Brighteon.com: Share the link. Spread the word. Vaccines cause autism. The vaccine industry hires internet trolls to attack anyone who dares to tell the truth, even while vaccine pushers are medical monsters who are committed heinous crimes against children on a daily basis. The vaccine industry is a criminal operation. Millions of children are harmed each year by vaccines, and the science quacks and vaccine propagandists keep claiming no child has ever been harmed by a single vaccine, even as more and more parents are stepping forward with their horrifying, true stories of their children being maimed by vaccine shots. Read Vaccines.news to stay informed.

From this day forth, says your Father, the true news, the true news is going to have to come from me, because even those stations that at one time were true are now turning and going the other direction because of the power, because of the money people, because of those that want the one world government etc

[ :: 2-25-15 pm service 2d word  ::  ::  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::]

TECHNIQUES TO DISCREDIT

June 26th, 2009

The Hidden Evil

Those who expose the financial elite typically receive character assassination from radio, TV, print media, official "experts," and "anti-hate" organizations. A combination of framings, murders, "accidents," and lawsuits may occur. "Educational" material is distributed to law enforcement to help them understand the "paranoid extremists" who believe that multinational corporations are installing a global dictatorship. Sutton and Wood warned, "Anyone in the U.S. who promotes unwelcome news for the elite receives some unwelcome attention in return." This attention includes the use of experts, mainstream media, and anti-hate organizations, for well-coordinated character assassination.(*) According to author Perloff, a document released by the House Committee on Un-American Activities, on September 23, 1956 entitled, Propaganda and the Alert Citizen outlined the tactics reportedly used by the Establishment to discredit opposition. Quoting from this document, Perloff wrote, "The tactic used had a prototype in a directive issued by the Communist Party... It read: When certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them, after suitable build-ups, as Fascist or Nazi or anti-Semitic, and use the prestige of anti-Fascist and tolerance organizations to discredit them. ... In the public mind constantly associate those who oppose us with those names which already have a bad smell." "Because the Establishment controls the media," wrote Allen, "anyone exposing the Insiders will be the recipient of a continuous fusillade of [criticism] ... from newspapers, magazines, TV and radio. In this manner one is threatened with the loss of 'social respectability' if he dares broach the idea that there is organization behind any of the problems currently wrecking America." "Smear tactics" from "left and right" are "standard operating procedure," explained Sutton and Wood. Even if you don't believe in the phony left/right political spectrum and have no political affiliation, you may be assigned one. Then the financial elite can use the opposite political party expressed in the mainstream news for character assassination. These labels, describe Sutton and Wood, "divert attention from responsible reasoned criticism with no attachment to a synthetic political spectrum." "If you assemble the evidence, carefully present your proofs, and try to expose these power seekers, the Establishment's mass media will accuse you of being a dangerous paranoid who is--dividing--our people," Allen said. In his book, With No Apologies, Senator Goldwater describes being on the receiving end of the Establishment's "professional scandalmongers." Apparently, because he was not controlled by the Establishment, the New York Times and New York Herald Tribune were used to discredit him during his campaigns. Perloff wrote, "Barry Goldwater was the Republican nominee and, as such, was the first GOP Presidential candidate in decades it [the CFR] had not controlled. Indeed, Goldwater represented nearly everything the Establishment was against. For that reason, the mass media was arrayed against him, and he was falsely characterized as a fanatic who would start a nuclear war and snatch social security checks from the elderly." Investigations into Crimes and Practices of the Financial Elite are Thwarted--Witnesses Discredited DeCamp explained that during his investigation of a child prostitution ring involving Satanism which lead to Washington D.C., that "Articles began to appear in the Omaha World-Herald, aimed to discredit the witnesses and intimidate any other potential child victim-witnesses from testifying." He cites some examples including the World-Herald's charge that it was a "hoax based on rumor." Editorial attacks ensued with titles such as, Grand Jury Did Its Job; The Insults Are Intolerable, and Schmit Panel Can't Duck its Responsibility in Hoax. The front page of the Omaha World-Herald on July 25, 1990 ran the headline, Grand Jury Says Abuse Stories Were a Carefully Crafted Hoax. And an article entitled, Former Legislator's Angry Memo Turns Sober Nebraska on its Ear, which appeared in the March 17, 1990 edition of the Kansas City Star, stated that the memo was, spawning swirls of gossip. The same article described that the accusations against these prominent people was like "insulting God." Compare these attacks to the criticism General Butler received by the mainstream news after exposing the plot by Wall Street to overthrow the U.S. Government, or the harassment the Reece Committee received when investigating the Tax-exempt Foundations. One of the most damaging dirty tricks used against DeCamp was an anonymous complaint from a concerned citizen, which was logged with the Department of Social Services, stating that he and his wife were abusing their daughter. This tactic was apparently used to stop his investigation and knock him out of the senate race. The cover-up of a similar event occurred in Minnesota, where prosecutor Kathleen Morris came under savage attack from the media when investigating a child sex ring that was apparently linked to the financial elite. After experiencing considerable pressure, Morris relinquished the investigation to Attorney General Hubert Humphrey Jr. Humphrey soon closed the case due to insufficient evidence. When the elite are linked to these types of crimes, evidence become missing, leads are not followed, people are discredited, jailed, disappear, or have accidents. These occasional leaks are part of a steady stream of corruption that only occasionally surfaces in the mainstream news. The discrediting and harassment tactics used during these cover-ups can happen anywhere the elite need to eliminate exposure to their activities. DeCamp calls it an "international organized crime syndicate, engaged in pedophilia, pornography, satanism, drugs, and money-laundering," which is "protected ... by federal authorities." William H. Kennedy describes an organized kidnapping ring in Belgium linked to the financial elite, in his book Satanic Crime: A Threat in the New Millennium. Using mainstream news, Kennedy explains that during these investigations, the police were consistently incompetent, made frequent mistakes, and failed to follow leads. These seemingly deliberate acts resulted in further deaths and kidnappings. The presiding judge, Jean-Marc Connerotte, secured the arrest of suspect Marc Dutroux. Dutroux escaped from prison once and was poised for a second escape before he was found with a handcuff key. According to Kennedy, Dutroux provided kidnapped girls to a Satanic cult which included members of the Bilderbergers. Judge Connerotte required a bulletproof vehicle and armed guards after learning that a contract had been taken out on his life. He was eventually dismissed from the bench. The removal of Connerotte, and the cover-up, triggered a peace march by 300,000 outraged Belgians who demanded reform of the political and judicial system. The Hidden Evil is Beyond a Congressional Investigation Similar tactics were used during the investigation of the Tax-exempt Foundations and their Think Tank interlocks during the Reece Committee hearings. Wormser described the violence of the attacks against the committee as "amazing." The Reece Committee itself observed that because the Tax-exempt Foundations and Think Tanks control the mainstream news and the government, that they were unable to conduct their investigation. The committee stated specifically, "The far-reaching power of the large foundations and of the interlock has so influenced the press, the radio, and even the government that it has become extremely difficult for objective criticism of foundation practices to get into news channels without having first been distorted, slanted, discredited, and at times ridiculed." In his book, How the World Really Works, Alan B. Jones considers the account of another Reece Committee insider, Norman Dodd, the Research Director. Dodd attests that death threats, harassment of witnesses, stalking, surveillance, blackmail, and framings were the real reasons the trials were discontinued. The Reece Committee declared, "The pressure against Congressional investigation has been almost incredible. As indicated by their arrogance in dealing with this Committee, the major foundations and their associated intermediary organizations have intrenched (sic) themselves behind a totality of power which presumes to place them beyond serious criticism and attack." Smoot commented, "As we have seen, two different committees of Congress--one Democrat-controlled and one Republican-controlled--have tried to investigate the ... tax-exempt foundations which are interlocked with, and controlled by, and provide the primary source of revenue for, the Council on Foreign Relations and its affiliates." Smoot continues, "Both committees were gutted with ridicule and vicious denunciation ... by internationalists in the Congress, by spokesmen for the executive branch of government, and by big respected publishing and broadcasting firms which are a part of the controlled propaganda network of the Council on Foreign Relations." So according to the results of a congressional investigation, the Tax-exempt Foundations and Think Tanks are beyond investigation. There was another attempt to investigate the Think Tanks by Congressman Larry McDonald. "In 1980, the American Legion national convention passed Resolution 773, which called for a congressional investigation of the Trilateral Commission and its predecessor, the Council on Foreign Relations," wrote author Marrs. "The following year," proclaimed Marrs "a similar resolution was approved by the veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW)." "Congressman Larry McDonald," continued Marrs, "introduced these resolutions in the House of Representatives but nothing came of it." Unfortunately Congressman McDonald, who opposed the Establishment, died in a curious incident involving a Russian missile which blew up Korean Airlines 007 on September 1, 1983. The bottom line is simply this: The Establishment will not allow the various organizations which it controls to stop the Hidden Evil. According to these researchers, some with first-hand experience, anyone who exposes the activities of the elite usually receives an assortment of character assassination from the mainstream media, anti-hate organizations, and official experts. Lawsuits may be filed. An IRS audit may occur. Other tactics are used, such as being threatened, framed, blackmailed, and murdered. Accidents which result in death or injury may be reverse engineered to appear as though they were not planned.(**) Many of these attacks are tactics within the Hidden Evil. According to the HUAC document, some people are allowed to gain enough momentum until they are in pubic view so they may be smeared by the mainstream media or other organizations under elite control. By this account, it is probably easier for the elite to ruin famous people, because they require no "suitable build-ups." Anyone who falls into disfavor with the elite can be ruined by these methods.

"The money powers prey upon the nation in times of peace and conspire against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than a monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, and more selfish than bureaucracy. It denounces as public enemies, all who question its methods or throw light upon its crimes." -Abraham Lincoln The Dangers of a Congressional Investigation Congress, in general, is under the absolute control of this mafia. As previously demonstrated, this has been accomplished through years of infiltration, blackmail, intimidation and bribery. The elite, who own the United States, literally, will never allow an investigation into the Hidden Evil. They will never allow the system which they control to stop this. A congressional investigation may be done for the deliberate purpose of convincing the general population that it does not exist, and to publicly discredit those speaking about it by portraying them as a few paranoid conspiracy theorists. Any investigation into the Hidden Evil by congress or another organization under the control of the Establishment will result in a whitewash. These whitewashes by congress have unfolded repeatedly. Consider that in addition to the outside attacks, the Reece Committee was also killed from within. This included receiving "palpably inadequate" funding, a reduction in research staff, denial of evidence, and general stonewalling. "Mr. Reece understood, soon after our investigation started, if not before, that we would be met with every obstacle which could be put in our way," stated Wormser. Other congressional whitewashes include the Roberts Commission (Pearl Harbor cover-up), and the Kerry Subcommittee (Iran Contra Scandal, Federal Drug Trafficking). The Warren Commission (investigating the death of JFK) is said to have been heavily whitewashed, the 9/11 Commission was a whitewash, and the McCormack-Dickstein Commission was partly a whitewash.(***) Some of these commissions were led by members of the CFR.

The United Nations If the UN investigated the Hidden Evil it would be a maneuver to whitewash and discredit targets. According to some researchers, the United Nations is a creation of the CFR. The UN would like us to believe that they're an organization that acts as a non-partisan referee, which reluctantly intervenes in world conflicts for the betterment of all parties concerned. Apparently, the idea is that if enough chaos is caused and the UN is portrayed in a positive manner, then the masses will believe that a world government under the control of the UN is the only hope for world peace. In a chapter entitled, United Nations and World Government Propaganda, Smoot commented, "All American advocates of supra-national government, or world government, claim their principal motive is to achieve world peace. Yet," he says, "these are generally the same Americans whose eager interventionism helped push America into two world wars." "By 1945, the Rockefellers were ready," wrote Allen. "Grandson Nelson was one of the 74 CFR members at the founding meeting of the United Nations in San Francisco." Perloff added, "Of the American delegates at the founding UN conference in San Francisco, more than forty belonged to the CFR." On the left is a March 1947 picture, which shows John D. Rockefeller III presenting UN Secretary General Trygve Lie with an $8.5 million dollar check to purchase land for the UN headquarters. Below it is the founding UN conference on June 15, 1945 in San Francisco.(*1) "Nelson and his brothers donated the land for the United Nations complex along the East River in New York," wrote Allen, and added, "possibly because they did not want the new headquarters of their World Government to be more than a short taxi-ride away from their penthouses." Author Marrs portrays the UN as, "an outgrowth of the old League of Nations," which he describes as a failed attempt at, "world government." "A primary mover of this and subsequent actions to establish a United Nations was John Foster Dulles, who had helped found the Council on Foreign Relations," wrote Marrs. Marrs continued, "Considering Dulles and the other CFR members [are] behind the creation of the UN, it is no surprise to find that organization today supervising the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (commonly called the World Bank) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF)." Author Alan B. Jones sums up the UN as a front for the banking elites to be used as the core of a political structure for a world government, using the IMF as the world central bank. "In 1948, the State Department created the U.S. Committee for the UN ... as a semi-official organization to propagandize for the UN," conveyed Smoot. The CFR dominates this committee, he says. He also contends that the UN Charter, which the CFR would like to have the US Constitution replaced with, is essentially a charter for enslavement. "The 'world peace' aspects of the United Nations were emphasized to enlist support of the American public," wrote Smoot. However, he adds, "the UN Charter really creates a worldwide social, cultural, economic, educational, and political alliance--and commits each member nation to a program of total socialism." Project Megiddo Project Megiddo is described by the FBI as a, "strategic assessment of the potential for domestic terrorism in the United States..." The document was apparently circulated to law enforcement throughout the country in 1999 to help identify domestic terrorist activities spawned by the year 2000 craze. It basically says that anyone who holds, "political beliefs relating to the New World Order (NWO) conspiracy theory," is "paranoid." "The challenge to law enforcement," it states, "is to understand these extremist theories." And just what are these paranoid conspiracy theories that the FBI is "educating" law enforcement on? According to the FBI, "The NWO conspiracy theory holds that the United Nations (UN) will lead a military coup against the nations of the world to form a socialist or One World Government." The FBI lists other groups that a paranoid conspiracy theorist might say are part of this socialist overthrow as: the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergers and the Trilateral Commission. They add, "Law enforcement officials will probably notice different versions of this theory, depending upon the source." They continue, "Law enforcement officers, as well as military personnel, should be aware that the nation's armed forces have been the subject of a great deal of rumor and paranoia circulating among many militia groups." They describe these militias as "Patriots," and "right-wing" groups who, "believe they are being persecuted by the satanic government of the United States." It looks like the CFR-controlled FBI laid the groundwork to portray anyone telling the truth as a dangerous paranoid. Megiddo is clearly CFR Damage Control. It seems to be an employment of the tactics contained in the HUAC document that Perloff warned about. Remember? "In the public mind constantly associate those who oppose us with those names which already have a bad smell." Continuing, they stated, "Use of this term [New World Order] within militia circles became more common after President Bush starting using it to refer to ... using international organizations to assist in governing international relations," and added, "The term One World Government is also used as a synonym for the New World Order." According to a document written by Dennis L. Cuddy, PhD, entitled, Chronological History of the New World Order, the term has been used since the mid 30s by a variety of people including multiple members of the CFR such as Nelson Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, and Richard Nixon. It has been mentioned in CFR's publication Foreign Affairs. H. G. Wells spoke of it, as did Mikhail Gorbachev. It has been used by George H. W. Bush on multiple occasions. "The term 'New World Order,'" says Cuddy, "has been used thousands of times ... by proponents in high places of federalized world government." In the last several years it has been used by leaders of a variety of nations who are obviously under the control of the financial elite. So according to Project Megiddo, the New World Order does exist and is beneficial. However, when we consider the publications of the "international organizations" that are assisting with "governing international relations" that Bush has been a member of, such as the CFR, the TC, and the Bilderbergers, it becomes clear that their intentions are to reduce civil liberties and merge America into a single world government controlled by them. It's obvious to me that Megiddo is disinformation, used for the purpose of discrediting anyone who is attempting to warn law enforcement about the fate of America. Speaking of Project Megiddo's predecessor, Former FBI Senior Special Agent Ted L. Gunderson wrote, "In 1996 the FBI Phoenix Division issued a pamphlet to local and state law enforcement agencies that set forth the profile of various terrorists in the United States. ... This profile includes: Defenders of the U.S. constitution against the federal government and the UN (Super Patriots) [and] ... anyone who makes references to the United States Constitution..." He warns, "An active Federal Government Disinformation Program ... was instituted for the purpose of discrediting ... [people] who report the truth about the government." Apparently, according to Gunderson, federal agencies release these documents as disinformation for the sole purpose of discrediting people who begin to wake up and tell the truth. I wonder--if we know that these two documents exist, then is it possible that more damaging information has been given to law enforcement to discredit the truth movement? "Distrust of the government by not thousands but tens of millions of U.S. citizens is confirmed in public opinion surveys," stated Dr. Alexander in his book, Future War. "Many of these conspiracy theory adherents believe that the government--or some other supranational organization--is attempting to take freedom away from citizens." As expected, he lists these supranational organizations as, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderbergers, and the Council on Foreign Relations, and The Order of Free and Accepted Masons. He continues, "Some of them see non-lethal weapons as tools to facilitate those objectives. They believe that these weapons potentially could be used to enslave them..." "Such systems," he says, "are usually rumored to be designed and controlled by some unspecified 'They' who are the ultimate powerbrokers." Evidence has already been provided which undeniably proves that the Trilateral Commission, and the Council on Foreign Relations have infiltrated the executive branch. I wonder how many of those tens of millions of conspiracy theorists are targeted but don't know it. False Memory Syndrome Foundation According to some researchers, one example of an organization that was launched for the sole purpose of discrediting people is the False Memory Syndrome Foundation (FMSF). In his book, Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness, author Jim Keith refers to the FMSF as a "pseudo-scholarly" front organization, consisting of "a group of psychiatrists whose mission is to prove that cult abuse and mind control are figments of the imagination." According to Keith, many of the psychiatrists on the FMSF board have been linked to mind-control experiments and the military. They are called in to court cases to discredit ritual abuse survivors. Author Constantine's analysis is similar, he proclaims that the FMSF consists of a panel of experts which are used to discredit therapists and victims that come forward with cases of Satanic Ritual Abuse (SRA) and experimentation. Professor Jennifer J. Freyd explains in her book, Betrayal Trauma, how the FMSF, her colleagues, and the mainstream media attempted to discredit her research into repressed memories. Her mother, Pamela Freyd, a founding member of the FMSF, also participated in the attacks against her credibility. In their book, Trance Formation of American, Cathy O'Brien and Mark Phillips arrive at the same conclusion. These and other authors contend that the CIA found it necessary to create this professional organization in order to discredit abuse claims. Mainstream News is Used to Discredit Targets Anytime mainstream media addresses an issue like this there is a very real danger of it being an attack. This was clearly the case with The Washington Post's January 14, 2007 article, entitled, Mind Games, or more appropriately, it should have been called, Word Games. Catherine Graham, the owner of The Washington Post, is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderbergers. The Post and most other mainstream news are controlled by the very elite Think Tanks that I'm alleging are responsible for this covert war against the civilian population. While I can't say for sure how this story was arranged, my guess is that representatives from the Post approached some TIs and portrayed themselves to be genuinely interested in covering the issue. Naturally, TIs anxious to get the word out, cooperated. But what resulted was a standard discrediting article. Although it did explain that thousands of people in the NATO countries claim to be targeted, it basically described them as delusional. Some common tactics to discredit are to portray facts as beliefs, to ignore evidence, and portray people as a haters or paranoids. This article has done all three. They realize that most of their readers won't research this story for themselves. Also, no websites devoted to this phenomenon were listed so their readers could follow-up. "The idea of a group of people convinced they are targeted by weapons that can invade their minds has become a cultural joke," they wrote. Referring to targeted people they stated, "In their esoteric lexicon, 'gang stalking' refers to the belief that they are being followed and harassed: by neighbors, strangers or colleagues who are agents for the government." Notice how they used the word, "belief." The article continued, "Gloria Naylor, a renowned African American writer, seems to defy many of the stereotypes of someone who believes in mind control." Once again, playing games with words. In this case implying that mind-control is just a belief and that projects such as MKULTRA did not take place. This is not a belief, it's a fact. Later in the article they acknowledged MKULTRA but portrayed it as simply an, "infamous CIA program that involved, in part, slipping LSD to unsuspecting victims." No mention was made of the other "parts," such as the children who were sexually abused, or of the other people who were brutally tortured and had their lives destroyed. This filtering out of information is basically, lying. They described one TI, probably an informant, who "criticizes what he calls the 'wacky claims' of TIs who blame various government agencies or groups of people without any proof." Of course this torturous program has not been proven in a court of law. And for reasons previously mentioned--it never will be. But there is plenty of evidence that it exists. The article went on to describe the TI mentioned above (a doctor), who was "hoping to prove that V2K, the technology to send voices into people's heads, is real." Once again, playing games with words. As previously demonstrated, mainstream publications announced that V2K was possible in the 70s. Once more, turning a fact into an opinion or belief. They are fully aware that most people either don't have the time or the inclination to do the research. Of course no hit story would be complete without the Establishment's use of official "experts" who assist them in damaging potential witnesses. Regarding MKULTRA, the article quoted from their interview with Dr. John B. Alexander, one of the alleged creators of this program. They wrote, Alexander acknowledged that "there were some abuses that took place," but added that, on the whole, "I would argue we threw the baby out with the bath water." More games with words. First, dismissing MKULTRA as just "some abuses," leads those who have not studied it (most of their readers) to conclude that there were a few slip-ups in an otherwise beneficial program. Second, implying that it stopped. Funny, Dr. Alexander must know that it continues in its advance form. As I've demonstrated, he and his colleagues helped create these weapons on behalf of their CFR handlers, for the "New World Order" which they've trumpeted in their articles. The Post continues citing more "experts." "Ralph Hoffman, a professor of psychiatry at Yale who has studied auditory hallucinations, regularly sees people who believe the voices are a part of government harassment," they said. "Not all people who hear voices are schizophrenic, he says, noting that people can hear voices episodically in highly emotional states. ... People who think the voices are caused by some external force are rarely dissuaded from their delusional belief, he says." Quoting Professor Hoffman, they wrote, "These are highly emotional and gripping experiences that are so compelling for them that ordinary reality seems bland." There are several assumptions that most readers of this statement will come away with. First, that V2K doesn't exist. Second, that all people complaining that an available technology is being used to harass them are definitely delusional. Third, that the government has not targeted the civilian population with advanced technology in the past. Continuing their assault, they stated, "Scott Temple, a professor of psychiatry at Penn State University who has been involved in two recent studies of auditory hallucinations, notes that those who suffer such hallucinations frequently lack insight into their illness. Even among those who do understand they are sick, 'that awareness comes and goes... People feel overwhelmed, and the delusional interpretations return.'" So, Professor Temple studied auditory hallucinations, but did he study a technology that can cause them? The article doesn't say. Once more, the implication is that it doesn't exist and that all of those complaining about it are delusional. Remember, doctors are highly complicit in the cover-up of this program. In addition, as previously demonstrated, the elite-owned Tax-exempt Complex provides the grants to these professors to do research projects with pre-determined outcomes. In other words, when the Establishment wants an official "expert" to prove a point, they'll provide them with grants to carry out a project which they have created. These college professors are often owned by the Establishment. "The very 'realness' of the voices is the issue-how do you disbelieve something you perceive as real? That's precisely what Hoffman, the Yale psychiatrist, points out: So lucid are the voices that the sufferers--regardless of their educational level or self-awareness--are unable to see them as anything but real. 'One thing I can assure you' Hoffman says, 'is that for them, it feels real.'" The people at the Post accomplished their obvious goal. My guess is that this story ran because information was beginning to leak out to the public. Summary Those who expose the financial elite typically receive character assassination from radio, TV, print media, official "experts," and "anti-hate" organizations. A combination of framings, murders, "accidents," and lawsuits may occur. "Educational" material is distributed to law enforcement to help them understand the "paranoid extremists" who believe that multinational corporations are installing a global dictatorship. [Footnotes]

* DeCamp stated that the elite used the mainstream news, the Anti Defamation League (ADL), and the Cult Awareness Network (CAN) to discredit him and other witnesses. The Establishment also used the mainstream news and the ADL to discredit the Reece Committee. For examples of this see Foundations: Their Power and Influence, by Rene Wormser. Also see The Invisible Government by Dan Smoot who describes how the Establishment labeled people anti-semitic and racists who investigated the Tax-exempt Foundations under the Cox Committee. ** DeCamp spoke of learning about an impending lawsuit against him which was to be used to destroy him in public view. There were 15 suspicious deaths of potential witnesses surrounding the Franklin case. One included chief investigator Gary Cordori who conveyed to DeCamp that he had evidence that would "blow the story wide open." Senator Loran Schmit who participated in the investigation received death threats and attempts to ruin him financially. DeCamp also stated that during the investigation multiple witnesses received IRS audits. Sutton and Wood contend that IRS audits are often used to intimidate critics of the Establishment. During Cointelpro the IRS was used for harassment, as described in the book, War At Home, by attorney Brian Glick. See also The Autobiography of Martin Luther King Jr. for how he was arrested for falsifying his tax returns in retaliation for his nonviolent direct action to affect social change. *** For the Iran Contra whitewash see the book, Powderburns by Celerino Castillo (former DEA) and Dave Harmon. Also see Cocaine Politics by Peter Dale Scott and Jonathan Marshall. For the Reece Committee whitewash see the books, The Invisible Government by former FBI Agent Dan Smoot, How The World Really Works, by Alan B. Jones, and Foundations: Their Power and Influence, by Rene Wormser. For the Pearl Harbor cover-up (The Roberts Commission) see Rule by Secrecy, by Jim Marrs and The Shadows of Power by James Perloff.

http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2009/06/26/techniques-to-discredit

etc. For the system as you know it is vanishing before your eyes, you can no longer rely upon your jobs, upon your banking institutions, all you can depend upon is a one world government and you cannot depend upon that. etc..

[ :: 3-11-09 pm service (third word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

Even now, saith your Father, they plot for a one world banking system, a one world government, a one world controlled by one man, etc..

[ :: 1-10-16 pm service  ::  ::  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. it shall not be a good week, many things shall take place.  Watch the stock market, and if you have money hoarded up in there, you are going to lose it, you are going to lose it.  Listen carefully, pay attention, place your money where you know that it is safe etc.

Federal Reserve Raises Rates to Raze Housing & Stocks to the Ground

Foreign owned Fed raises rates to kill Trump recovery

The David Knight Show - December 20, 2018

It’s either gross incompetence, or malicious destruction to raise rates when the stock market & housing markets are showing signs of a crash beginning. Why do the globalists support growth rates of nearly 10% a year for China but warn the US will burn down if growth is above 3%?

:: 12-22-18 The Express :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

World War 3: Russia moves missile warship into Azov Sea ready for showdown

A RUSSIAN missile frigate is moving in the direction of the Azov Sea from Crimea amid World War 3 tensions between Moscow and Ukraine.

By Rebecca Perring

PUBLISHED: 00:05, Sat, Dec 22, 2018 | UPDATED: 00:06, Sat, Dec 22, 2018

Russian forces detained 23 Ukrainian seamen, injuring at least six, after Moscow accused Kiev of “illegally” manoeuvring through the Kerch Strait. With relations still raw after Russia's 2014 annexation of Crimea from Ukraine and its backing for a pro-Moscow insurgency in eastern Ukraine, the crisis has risked pushing the two countries into open conflict. Ukraine is not a NATO member though it aspires to membership. The European Union, Britain, France, Poland, Denmark, and Canada all condemned what they called Russian aggression. The frigate sighting comes after Russia insisted it is not increasing its military presence in the Sea of ​​Azov. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said forces are guarding the Crimean Bridge. She said: “Russia is not increasing its military presence in the Sea of Azov, there are no Russian naval bases there, the forces that are there are used to guard the Crimean Bridge. "I will remind you that from the very beginning of statements about this infrastructure facility's construction plans, we have heard direct calls by Ukrainian officials - politicians and security officials, who obey the Kiev regime - to destroy it. "These forces are also used to ensure the safety of navigation."

:: 12-21-18 Free Republic :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Greece warns Turkey: “If they make the slightest move, we will crush them”

Voice of Europe ^ | 12/21/18

Posted on 12/21/2018, 6:52:55 PM by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis

Stern warnings from Greece to Turkey. Stern words in return, as well. Defence Minister Panos Kammenos warned that Ankara would pay for violating Greek airspace by Turkish jets over the Aegean. The minister said whilst visiting a military outpost on the Aegean island of Leros, “If they make the slightest move, we will crush them,” adding that Athens wants peace and harmony but it won’t “concede a single centimetre” of its land. His words seem aligned with Admiral Evangelos Apostolakis, chief of the Hellenic General Staff, who said: “If the Turks land on a rocky islet, we will raze it to the ground. That is a red line that is espoused by the government,” suggesting a military confrontation with Turkey is a possibility, but adds “along with the US and the European Union, we want to ensure that the Turks do not reach that point.” Turkey’s Gen. Hulusi Akar, chief of its General Staff fired back that they will not allow “any fait accompli in the Aegean and the Mediterranean”. Turkey will not back down “from the rights of our country and our people,” he added. There have been clashes the past few years between the two NATO allies countries’ warships, as well as mid-air encounters of Turkish and Greek jets, with this current scuffle over a pair of Turkish F-16s making a fly over on Thursday of the island Kastelorizo in the eastern Aegean. Only minutes before a helicopter with Greek Defence Minister Panos Kammenos travelled the area on the way to Athens. The dispute between Greece and Turkey continues over the Aegean as dozens of small islets in the sea make determination of the boundaries of the maritime border especially difficult. Despite efforts to come to agreement, the two countries have so far had no success.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3714548/posts?page=16 

:: 12-21-18 You Tube :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

12/21/2018 -- Large earthquake activity -- West Coast USA unrest -- Pacific Keep Watch

18,717 views

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ti2JEtigd80 

[ :: 5-28-06 pm service   :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]  

 etc Did they listen when I warned them about the great earthquakes or the forest fires? Did they believe you about the global warming and the hot, hot weather that would come etc

:: 12-21-18 The Big Wobble :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

2018 set to be 4th hottest on record as November is officially the 5th hottest on record according to NOAA: 2019 could be hottest ever Met Office

Friday, 21 December 2018

:: 12-20-18 Jihad Watch :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Pope likens migrants to Jesus as Vatican top dog says hunted Christian Asia Bibi is “internal matter” of Pakistan

Dec 20, 2018 1:45 pm By Robert Spencer

Does this pious hypocrite not consider the possibility that Asia Bibi, the Christian woman who spent eight years on death row for “blasphemy” in Pakistan and is now in hiding there as Muslims who want to murder hunt for her from house to house, feels the pain of not being welcomed into the Vatican? “Leave them; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.” (Matthew 15:14)

Pope Francis@Pontifex Jesus knows well the pain of not being welcomed. May our hearts not be closed as were the houses in Bethlehem. #Internationalmigrantsday 36.2K 5:30 AM - Dec 18, 2018

“‘Asia Bibi was released,'” translated from “‘Asia Bibi è stata scarcerata,'” by Angelo Scarano, Il Giornale, November 7, 2018: Asia Bibi, the Pakistani woman acquitted last week by the Supreme Court on blasphemy charges, for which she was sentenced to death, has left the prison….The woman’s husband has asked for help from Italy and the request to grant her political asylum is being considered…. “It’s an internal matter of Pakistan, I hope it can be resolved in the best way … I do not know how it will end, there have been many reactions … The question is not simple, it is very complex and delicate. Always we hope that it ends in the best way,” said Cardinal Pietro Parolin, Vatican Secretary of State.

[:: 2-3-14 am service (first word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :::: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

:: 12-21-18 The Jerusalem Post :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Sixteen-year-old Palestinian killed by IDF during Gaza border protests

Sixteen-year-old Mohammad Jahjouh was fatally shot in the neck, while 25 others, including a local journalist, were wounded by Israeli gunfire, according to the Palestinian Health Ministry.

An estimated 8,000 Gazans participated in demonstrations near the security fence Friday as part of the weekly “Great March of Return” protests. Sixteen-year-old Mohammad Jahjouh was fatally shot in the neck, while 25 others, including a local journalist, were wounded by Israeli gunfire, according to the Hamas-affiliated Palestinian Health Ministry. The Health Ministry reported later that another two men, aged 28 and 40, died of injuries they sustained at protests in two separate locations along the fence with Israel earlier in the day. Saturday morning, the ministry reported another fatality coming out of the weekly demonstrations along the Gaza-Israel border line, bringing the total number of casualties to four. The fatalities were identified by WAFA News Agency as Maher Yasin, 40, Abdul-Aziz Abu Shari'a, 28, Ayman Munir Mohammed Shabir, 18, and Mohammad Mo’een Jahjouh, 16. "The armed option is the only one that can succeed against the machinations of the Zionist entity," said a Hamas spokesperson, according to Israeli media reports. Demonstrators expressed their appreciation for "the heroes of the resistance in the West Bank," referring to recent terrorist attacks. The demonstrators allegedly burned tires and threw stones and explosive and incendiary devices at IDF soldiers during the protests in order to disrupt Israeli positions along the fence. None of the projectiles landed in Israeli territory. "Troops responded with riot dispersal means and fired in accordance with standard operating procedures," an Israeli military spokeswoman. The clashes follow a recent surge of violence in the West Bank. Last Thursday a Palestinian gunman killed two Israeli soldiers, and Israeli forces killed two Hamas fugitives whom it blamed for earlier terror attacks. Israeli forces also killed two Palestinians that Israel said had tried to carry out future attacks. Hamas marked the 31st anniversary of its founding Sunday. Friday's protest is the first since this commemoration. Anna Ahronheim and Reuters contributed to this report.

:: 12-21-18 Ynet :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

The kidney club

Doctors at Beilinson Hospital performed an extraordinary 8-way kidney surgery involving 4 donors and 4 recipients brought together by Matnat Chaim, dedicated to encouraging altruistic kidney donations.

Rotem Elizera|Published: 12.21.18 , 13:02

In Israel, there is an interconnected group of people who, only a short while ago, were complete strangers but are now organically connected after an unprecedented operation in which four willing donors shared one of their kidneys with four recipients who desperately needed them, saving their lives. In a record-breaking “cross-transplant” procedure performed by doctors at Beilinson Hospital in Petah Tikva, four donor kidneys were transplanted simultaneously to the bodies of four different patients in the space of 48 hours. Most people are born with two functioning kidneys, but their blood filtering capacity is actually far beyond 100%, thereby allowing for someone to donate one kidney without suffering any negative effects. According to Israeli law, a kidney donation must be either from a relative or through an altruistic kidney donor. The transplant chain was facilitated by Matnat Chaim, an Israeli non-profit dedicated to encouraging healthy volunteers to donate kidneys to patients requiring a transplant. The organization, which has already facilitated 626 transplants to date, was founded in 2007 by Rabbi Yeshayahu Heber after he found himself needing a kidney, finding a donor and then setting out to help others who were in the same predicament. This kidney donor chain began with altruistic donor Benjamin, who donated to a man named Lee. Yardena, Lee’s partner, in turn donated a kidney to a woman named Leah, whose son, Yonatan, donated a kidney to a man named Suheib. Suheib’s mother, Maison, then donated her kidney to a woman named Gil—who was meant to be the original recipient of the kidney donated by Benjamin. "I approached Matnat Chaim Chairman Rabbi Heber and asked him to help me find a kidney donor," said Gil, 36, adding, "to my delight, Benjamin, a person I don’t even know, agreed to donate his kidney … unfortunately though he wasn’t a match.” After tests conducted by doctors at Beilinson ahead of the planned cross-transplant, a possibility arose for Gil to be at the receiving end of a new kidney. "We have all become like family," Gil continued, “All of us are from a different background—religious, secular, right and left-wing, Jews and Arabs—there is now a special connection between us." Yonatan Tager, who was also part of the record-breaking transplant, said he “didn't hesitate” donating his kidney in order to save his mother’s life. "My mother had a severe decrease in kidney function and her condition deteriorated to the point that she required an urgent kidney transplant," says Yonatan. “At the hospital we were offered to participate in a cross-transplant, meaning that I would donate my kidney to someone else and in return my mother would be matched with a donor.” Prof. Eitan Mor, who heads the Beilinson transplant center, said that a procedure involving four transplants is extremely complicated and requires “precision,” and “maximum compatibility between patients and donors.” "Patients can wait for years to find a matching donor, and the cross-transplant program provides a solution … I'm sure this breakthrough will lead to further operations of this nature."

https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-5429929,00.html 

:: 12-21-18 WTXL ABC 27 :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Alabama police department blames crime on rejection of God

Dec 21, 2018 Updated Dec 21, 2018

OPP, Ala. (AP) - A rural Alabama police department that used social media to scold community members for rejecting God is coming under fire from a group that opposes mixing government and religious faith. A statement posted on Facebook by the Opp Police Department on Tuesday blames a spike in area homicides on the idea that young people have turned away from God and "embraced Satan." The post followed two gunshot killings in as many days in Covington County, located on the Alabama-Florida line. But the Wisconsin-based Freedom From Religion Foundation says police in the town of 6,500 people are wrongly promoting religion with the social media message. The group says it's illegal for a government entity to endorse or criticize religious belief. Opp police didn’t immediately return a phone call Thursday seeking comment.

:: 1-18-09 am service (1^st word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::]

etc. Keep your eyes upon me, watch and listen, even as volcanoes begin to erupt, landslides and avalanches, flooding overseas, soon to America. But keep your eyes on the things that I have told you and realize that my church shall go through this time in great victory.

:: 12-22-18 Volcano Discovery :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Krakatau volcano news & eruption updates:

Krakatoa volcano (Sunda Strait, Indonesia): increased activity, likely new phase of lava fountains and lava flow

Saturday Dec 22, 2018 08:52 AM | BY: T

Another strong eruptive phase (paroxysm) is currently going on at the volcano.

Seismicity at Anak Krakatau has sharply increased during the past days and now shows continuous explosive/effusive activity. The observatory informed us that a lava flow is occurring from the summit vent, likely accompanied by lava fountaining, similar to what we observed in Sep and Nov during our latest expeditions to Krakatau. This is what it probably looks like now:

etc. Keep your eyes; keep your eyes upon what is going on in the Mid-East, that is your tree, that is your tree, I have told you to watch Israel, that is your tree. etc.

https://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Column-One-Trump-pushes-past-Obamas-legacies-574988 

[ :: 7-30-08 pm service (first Word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc For truly in the world right now, saith your Father God, is much trouble, trouble that they know not how to deal with etc

:: 12-21-18 Hal Lindsey :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Bedlam at the Border

By Hal Lindsey

The Bible’s description of the end times shows a world where massive waves of migration will be increasingly common. Such upheaval will further destabilize an already unstable world. r those of us in the United States, precursors to those end times movements of people are beginning to hit close to home. Right now, thousands of migrants continue to mass along the Mexico-USA border. The Department of Homeland Security says that historically only about 10% of those seeking asylum will be found eligible for it. But it may be even lower this time because people still in the caravans have already been offered asylum by Mexico and refused it. Refusing asylum indicates that asylum is not their main goal. On the news, we see close-up pictures of women with children. But in wider shots, you can see that the vast majority in the caravans are young men. The DHS has confirmed this obvious fact. Letting these young men into the country is problematic because of the difficulty in investigating their past. Are they drug dealers or members of a gang? Are they trying to get into the US in order to escape the consequences of a criminal history in their home countries? It’s difficult to get solid information. DHS has verified that at least 600 people in the latest caravan to arrive at the border are known criminals. But we don’t know the total number of criminals because so many of these people cannot be properly vetted. On November 26th, DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen issued a statement regarding the violence at the San Ysidro Port of Entry just south of San Diego. “The violence we saw at the border was entirely predictable. This caravan, unlike previous caravans, had already entered #Mexico violently and attacked border police in two other countries. I refuse to believe that anyone honestly maintains that attacking law enforcement with rocks and projectiles is acceptable. It is shocking that I have to explain this, but officers can be seriously or fatally injured in such attacks. Self-defense isn’t debatable for most law-abiding Americans.” Before the election, the media told us that the caravans heading toward the US border were fake news — an idea drummed up by the President to scare people. The day after the election, talking heads on CNN were telling their audience that Fox News had already dropped the caravan story. At that very same moment on Fox News, they were discussing the increasing dangers of the caravan. DHS says the first caravan wound up being larger than expected, with some 8,500 already gathered in Tijuana and Mexicali. But there are yother caravans on the way. Most of the people in those caravans have been sold a bill of goods. They’ve been lied to at every turn. For the most part, they want to come to America for the good life. That’s understandable, but not the same thing as a quest for asylum. There are ways to enter the United States legally. But an assault on the border is not one of them.

https://www.hallindsey.com/ww-12-3-2018/ 

[ :: 10-17-10 am service  (first word)  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. truly darkness, darkness is growing darker and darker and darker, war is being prepared, war is being made ready. Watch Russia, watch Turkey, watch China, watch Iran, watch Pakistan, watch Saudi Arabia, for they are not your friends nor have they ever been your friends.  They are not my friends, saith your Father God, for they shall wage war against me in the last days, these are the last days. etc.. 

:: 12-22-18 The Times of Israel :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Iranian ships fire rockets as US aircraft carrier enters Persian Gulf

USS John C. Stennis transits Strait of Hormuz after longest post-9/11 absence; Revolutionary Guard vessels launch rockets away from carrier, fly a drone nearby

By Jon Gambrell 21 December 2018, 9:52 pm

ABOARD THE USS JOHN C. STENNIS IN THE PERSIAN GULF (AP) — A US aircraft carrier sailed into the Persian Gulf on Friday, becoming the first since America’s withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal and breaking the longest carrier absence in the volatile region since at least the September 11 terror attacks. The arrival of the USS John C. Stennis comes as Iranian officials have returned to repeatedly threatening to close off the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow mouth of the Persian Gulf through which a third of all oil traded by sea passes. Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps vessels shadowed the Stennis and its strike group, at one point launching rockets away from it and flying a drone nearby. The long absence of a carrier, however, could become a standard practice here as now-outgoing Defense Secretary Jim Mattis sought to shake up naval operations and American air bases spanning the region can scramble fighter jets and drones. “We are trying to be more operationally unpredictable,” said Lt. Chloe Morgan, a spokeswoman for US’s Bahrain-based 5th Fleet. “Now we’re switching it up because our adversaries are watching closely. We want to be operationally unpredictable to our enemies, but strategically predictable to our partners.” The Navy invited journalists to ride on the nuclear-powered Stennis, whose homeport is Bremerton, Washington, as it transited the Strait of Hormuz. The strait at its narrowest point is 33 kilometers (21 miles) wide, in the waters between Iran and Oman. Despite being so narrow and within the territorial waters of those two nations, the strait is viewed as an international transit route. American forces routinely travel through the area, despite sometimes tense encounters with Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, a paramilitary force answerable only to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. For Iran’s part, they compare the American presence to Tehran sending warships to the Gulf of Mexico. Tensions have been high since US President Donald Trump’s May withdrawal from Iran’s nuclear deal, which saw sanctions lifted for Tehran limiting its uranium enrichment. Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, a relative moderate within the country’s Shiite theocracy whose major achievement was the deal, has repeatedly warned any attempt to stop Iran’s export of crude oil could see it close off the strait. However, the 5th Fleet says it has not seen any “unsafe and unprofessional” actions by Iranian naval forces in the Persian Gulf since August 2017 before the Stennis’ transit through the strait. Throughout its trip Friday, some 30 Iranian Revolution Guard vessels trailed the Stennis and its strike group. One small vessel launched what appeared to be a commercial-grade drone to film the American ships. Photographers and videographers on the Iranian boats could clearly be seen also filming the Stennis while journalists on board the aircraft carrier filmed them. “The Iranian craft drove in front of our ship and stopped and tried to capture their own sort of picture of what was going on,” said Capt. Randy Peck, the commanding officer of the Stennis. There was no immediate mention of the Stennis’ arrival to the Persian Gulf in Iranian state media. The long gap between carrier deployments in the Persian Gulf represents a change in US military strategy dating back to the first Gulf War in 1991 and the overflights of Iraq that followed for years after. Mattis, as the head of the US military’s Central Command, himself demanded two carrier groups in the Persian Gulf as he led the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Since then, Mattis has said he wants a more unpredictable Navy to respond to Russia and China, which he sees as the “great power competition” America now faces. “The way you do this is we ensure that preparation for great power competition drives not simply a rotation schedule that allows me to tell you, three years from now, which aircraft carrier will be where,” Mattis told a US House committee in April. “That’s a great way to run a shipping line. It’s no way to run a Navy.” It’s unclear, however, whether Mattis’ strategy will continue. The defense secretary resigned Thursday after clashing with Trump over the abrupt withdrawal of US troops from Syria. The US military also operates air bases in Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, as well as a major Army base in Kuwait and its Navy base in Bahrain. That offers the American military a variety of locations both in the Persian Gulf, as well as other bases in the wider Mideast, to launch strikes. “Carriers were needed to support many of the initial strikes in Afghanistan in 2001, some attacks in Iraq in 2003, and most tactical missions in Syria in 2011,” said Bryan Clark, a senior fellow at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. “After access to adequate ground bases was obtained for today’s operations in Syria and Iraq, carrier-based aircraft were not as essential for these missions.” “The US does not need carriers in the Persian Gulf,” he added. As military operations wind down in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria, that likely will mean less need for airstrikes as well. However, the 5th Fleet still maintains a fleet of 21 ships from Bahrain and other Navy ships will continue to transit the strait. “The American Navy is showing they’re committed to regional stability all across the globe but particularly in the Gulf region,” Peck said. “It’s a very economically important area for the entire world, so we’re going to continue to go wherever we can internationally, in international waters.”

:: 12-21-18 The Times of Israel :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Israel, Greece, Cyprus to ink natural gas pipeline deal next year, PM says

US ambassador says project will provide ‘stability and prosperity’ to Middle East and Europe, urges all countries in the region to ensure it succeeds

By AFP and TOI staff 20 December 2018, 9:44 pm

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Thursday that Israel, Greece and Cyprus will sign an agreement early next year to build a pipeline to carry natural gas from the eastern Mediterranean to Europe, while the United States pledged its support for the ambitious project. The $7 billion project, expected to take six or seven years to complete, promises to reshape the region as an energy provider and dent Russia’s dominance over the European energy market. It also could curtail Iranian ambitions to use Syria as a gateway to the eastern Mediterranean. Speaking at a summit with the Greek and Cypriot leaders in Beersheba, Netanyahu said the three nations reaffirmed their commitment to the pipeline and discussed “important aspects” of the project. Italy is also a partner in the pipeline’s planning. Cyprus President Nicos Anastasiades said the project is waiting for a green light from the European Union to move forward. “We’re going to sign formally, officially, this agreement in a few months,” Netanyahu said at what was the fifth annual summit of the three countries. In another boost for the project, US Ambassador David Friedman hailed the pipeline as integral to the “stability and prosperity of the Middle East and Europe,” and urged all countries in the region to ensure its success. Washington is eyeing the east Mediterranean with renewed interest. In a meeting with the Greek foreign minister earlier this month, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo called the region “an important strategic frontier” for Washington, which is working to strengthen its relations with “democratic allies there like Greece and Cyprus and Israel.” Israel has been developing natural gas fields off its Mediterranean coast for the past decade. Its “Tamar” field already is operational, while the larger “Leviathan” field is expected to be operational next year. While most of its gas is used domestically, it has signed export deals with Egypt and Jordan and has its eyes on the larger European market. The proposed pipeline would allow Israel and Cyprus to export their recently discovered offshore reserves to Italy and eventually to the rest of Europe. Greece, which would act as a conduit for the gas to the continent, could also use the pipeline to convey any hydrocarbons potentially found in its own waters. This would potentially transform the countries’ economies while also diversifying Europe’s gas supply and reduce its dependence on Russia. Developing the region’s hydrocarbon reserves would also serve to curb Teheran’s bid to “open a window” to the east Mediterranean through Syria, Assistant Secretary of State Wess Mitchell told Greek language newspaper Kathimerini in an interview published this week. At Thursday’s summit, the leaders offered no details of a construction timeline. The countries also pledged to cooperate in cybersecurity, while Israel and Cyprus signed a preliminary deal on technical cooperation and Israel and Greece reached a framework agreement on satellite technology.

[ :: 7-8-12 am Campmeeting Service (third word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

[ :: 7-3-15 Campmeeting afternoon service (third word]  ::  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc America your money will be worth nothing in the near future, this will bring panic, famine and martial law, yes, in the streets of America.  If you had read my word you know that these are the beginning of sorrows etc

:: 12-10-18 SHTF Plan :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Signs of Coming Collapse: Citizens Worldwide Revolt Against Taxation & Illegal Aliens

Jeremiah Johnson December 10th, 2018 SHTFplan.com

There are many serious issues to address, relevant to current events. Just to skim some of what has happened most recently, the Dow Jones (although a “lagging” indicator) has been extremely volatile within the past month, appearing to be headed toward a loss for the year overall. Spending is down, and the “bubble” of pseudo-consumer confidence prior to Thanksgiving seems to have dissipated. The main focus: the unrest that is swiftly crossing national borders has a common denominator in France, and now in Belgium and the Netherlands. That common denominator is that of the populace being fed up with the amount of taxation, coupled with the politicos pushing illegal Muslim aliens into nations that have been predominantly Christian for almost a thousand years. In countries such as Germany, Sweden, and Norway (whose ancestors were not known for playing “softball,” i.e. the Saxons and Vikings, respectively) we have been witness to rapes and beatings perpetrated by Muslim illegal aliens with the governments either looking the other way or encouraging it. Soros and those of his ilk in the EU have been pushing this “forced integration” of an invasion of illegals with a huge ethnic and religious gap between them and the host nations. The controllers (oligarchs and politicos) are pushing these (numerically speaking) armies of aliens into previously stable nations…for several express purposes:

The denigration of the nations’ borders, language, religion, family structure, and culture

To reduce the nations’ original populace to a state of abandoning their nationalities and nationalism

To place these aliens into a position where they will weaken the economies of the nations (by being forced onto the dole) and also utilizing their numbers for support when it comes time to “vote” in these nations.

We have been witnessing an internal conquest fomented upon each of these European nations more effective than any invasion with military resources. The controllers are “injecting” these aliens into the populations and allowing their destructive natures and habits (completely at odds with the host nation) to destroy those countries….from within.

[  :: 2-2-13 am service  (first word)  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc.. Throughout the world right now peace is fastly disappearing, wars are rising up, trouble on the right hand, trouble on the left hand, etc..

:: 12--18 American Military News :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

The U.S. military carried out a series of deadly airstrikes in Somalia over the weekend, leaving dozens of militants dead. U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) released a statement early Monday morning revealing that U.S. forces had conducted six airstrikes that killed a total of 62 militants of al-Shabaab – the largest affiliate of al Qaeda. Four of the airstrikes took place on Saturday, where forces targeted a known location of al-Shabaab militants in Gandarshe, Somalia. An estimated 34 militants were killed after the four strikes. Another two airstrikes took place on Sunday also in Gandarshe, Somalia, killing another 28 al-Shabaab militants. “All six (6) airstrikes were conducted in close coordination with the Federal Government of Somalia and targeted a known al-Shabaab encampment. U.S. Africa Command and our Somali partners conducted these airstrikes to prevent terrorists from using remote areas as a safe haven to plot, direct, inspire, and recruit for future attacks,” AFRICOM said.

Al-Shabaab Forces Degraded by U.S., Federal Government of Somalia – https://t.co/f3XjSWzsAF  pic.twitter.com/zQvfPJxgJH  

— US AFRICOM (@USAfricaCommand) December 17, 2018

The targeted airstrike did not cause any civilian injuries or casualties. “Alongside our Somali and international partners, we are committed to preventing al-Shabaab from taking advantage of safe havens from which they can build capacity and attack the people of Somalia. In particular, the group uses portions of southern and central Somalia to plot and direct terror attacks, steal humanitarian aid, extort the local populace to fund its operations, and shelter radical terrorists,” AFRICOM added. Al-Shabaab has a significant presence in Somalia, where they have been countered steadily by the Somalian government backed by U.N. support. More than 500 U.S. troops are deployed to Somalia and will remain there until the government can independently handle their security, according to Time Magazine. Airstrikes on Somalia were authorized by President Donald Trump in March 2017 in order to begin countering al-Shabaab’s deadly and growing influence. Approximately 46 airstrikes have been conducted against al-Shabaab this year alone, according to the Associated Press. In October, U.S. forces conducted its largest Somalian airstrike of the year, killing an estimated 60 militants in Haradere. Al-Shabaab carried out Somalia’s most deadly terror attack in October 2017 when they detonated a massive truck bomb in Mogadishu, killing at least 500 people and injured hundreds more. Much of al-Shabaab’s presence is in coastal Somalia near Mogadishu. In the U.S. State Department’s Country Reports on Terrorism 2017 released in September, Somalia was deemed a “terrorist safe haven.” “Al-Shabaab experienced significant military pressure during 2017, but the group still maintained control over large portions of the country. Al-Shabaab retained the ability to carry out high-profile attacks using vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices (VBIEDs), suicide bombings, mortars, and small arms,” the report said.

:: 12--18 www.mdcreekmore.com  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Don’t Tread on Me – What It Means Today

In This, That, and The Other by Jesse Mathewson

Of the many slogans that have been socially adopted by some as a banner, and others as the new evil to kill, the line, “Don’t tread on me” is easily among the top ten over the past few years. To find out what it means today we need to look at where it came from, and why. It is a flag, as well as a slogan, and I hope to help you understand it better. Rattlesnakes, in this case, the eastern diamondback and the timber rattlesnake, were both abundant in North America, and something not found in Great Britain. Benjamin Franklin made many references to rattlesnakes in his commentaries, published from 1751 onward. In 1754 he published the woodcut of a snake cut into 8 sections with the message, “JOIN or DIE”. Fast forward 21 years and we were on the cusp of a civil war with England. Contrary to what has been taught for decades in the United States, our war with England was, in fact, a rebellion. Christopher Gadsden designed the Gadsden flag in 1775, this is what we think of today when we hear the phrase, “Don’t tread on me”. This was the year before the declaration of independence was signed. As a firm believer in the natural rights of man*, I choose to see the benefit of separating from the state of England. In 1778 the United States Congress began using the War Office Seal, which was replaced in 1947 for the official document used by the Department of Army Emblem, pictured here. As you can see, the rattlesnake, like the bald eagle and the lone pine tree, features heavily in our history and documentation. Current day versions of the Gadsden flag can be traced to the Tea Party movement, another maligned movement based in a misrepresented historical ideal. One article from 2016 says, “The snake, it turns out, was something of a Colonial-era meme, evidently originated by Benjamin Franklin. In 1751, Franklin made the satirical suggestion that the colonies might repay the Crown for shipping convicts to America by distributing rattlesnakes around England, “particularly in the Gardens of the Prime Ministers, the Lords of Trade and Members of Parliament; for to them we are most particularly obliged.” (Walker, 2016) Modern “educated” writers who cannot be bothered to search further than Wikipedia are in fact the reason why, in our current day and age, any use of the Gadsden flag is seen as hateful by the left – or worse, as supportive of yet more government by the right. These people use just enough verifiable information that no one questions the veracity of their stories, tweets, and posts. England and more specifically the East India Trading Company owned or controlled the original 13 colonies, as well as lands spanning what is currently Canada. The colonists had, for many years, dealt with everything from forced conscription in the English naval forces, to forced eviction from homes built and land farmed for years. In addition to these things, there were the many instances of quartering of English troops in colonial residences without any real recompense. All of this was done under the color of law and for the colonists’ “own good”. The reasoning was the same as what we are given today when taxes are raised, levies are sought, and new wars and conflicts entered into. “Your safety, the safety of (English) interests abroad and the furthering of (English) influence around the globe!” For 258 years the East India Trading company literally ruled the world, and it was all done under English laws and rules. Use of symbols was especially important at a time when many people were not able to read and write effectively. By using figures such as rattlesnakes and bald eagles, these uniquely American animals, the colonial civilians could cling to something that was theirs, and that did not stem from the King or company controlling the leaders of the “civilized” world. It should be noted that the idea of slavery as an institution and means of profit was originated by Spain, England, and the East India Trading Company. (Please note that while the East India Trading Company is also known as the British East India Trading Company, and the Dutch East India Trading Company, it was originated and founded in London in 1600) The symbol of the rattlesnake was specifically meant to offer a warning to England. A rattlesnake that is stepped on bites in every case. This is obviously dangerous to the person doing the stepping, hence the term, “Don’t tread on me,” it was meant to convey this warning in terms that even the farmers and working man could understand. Over the past few years, we have seen extremes, more so than ever before. These extremes are a result of people being classified, labeled, and marginalized by mainstream media and politicians alike. In our modern society, thanks to endless loops of 15-second sound-bytes and directed social media outbursts, we see even more people becoming disillusioned with the status quo. On a personal note, the past few years have been difficult beyond any other years before in my life. The hatred is being stoked to further divide the population, much like what happened in France prior to their revolution, and here in the United States prior to ours. This has led to people using old slogans and catch phrases to promote alternatives to the status quo. “Don’t tread on me” is just such a slogan. I embrace this slogan though I do not embrace all who use it. This is extremely important to understand. Americans, and humans in general love to use others to validate their beliefs. There are those of us who realize that only the facts matter in the end. This means that in some respects we have to understand that the data is simply that, data. There is a current phrase being used, “Big Data”. I see this phrase for what it is, the philosophical ramblings of Political Science majors who have no concept of facts outside of how they may prop up their positions. Consider this, in recent decades, this country has been in a state of upheaval. Financial destruction, millions of hard-working Americans jobless, increasing inflation, and hundreds of new laws and protest organizations. Certainly, there is blame to go around, and it should be directed at each of us. We are to blame for our own life decisions and approaches. This being said, when you have a government that cannot listen to the people, or people who are more interested in emotional outbursts than facts, these slogans and their history become that much more important! I will not blame a single man or woman, but rather a mindset that infects and affects all of us. This malaise and division are embraced and promoted by those in control as well as many who prop them up with financial and “moral” support. Modern usage of this term was meant to generate a sense of patriotic furor and has been associated with the Tea Party movement, a more recent movement originally designed to protest extremely high taxes and government overreach, but which was co-opted and devolved into mainstream political infighting. Between the mainstream media (all sides), and political finagling (on all sides), what could have been a positive thing was subverted, perverted, and eventually demonized by many Americans – simply due to ignorance being given platform over facts. In looking at the history of the Gadsen flag in use we find that the first to use it was Commander Esek Hopkins, the first “admiral” of the newly formed naval forces. He was widely known to have not been enamored with Washington and other “leaders” of that time. He was, however, an active privateer prior to, and during, the Revolutionary War. In his words, “the two new ships are Launched & will be soon ready if men could be had.” (Hopkins, 1776) He was speaking about the fact that Washington and Gates were requisitioning all the men and not leaving any to man the newly formed fleet. Washington later sacked him, many believe this was a result of Hopkins inability to hold his tongue when someone was doing something he saw as stupid. When using historical symbols, my personal approach is to learn as much as I can about them and to absorb the real history surrounding them. This is a reason I have not adopted the rather common “Molon Labe” phrase. In the case of the “Don’t tread on me” flag, it was brightly colored and easy to read. Also, over the ocean in sailing craft where it could take an entire day or longer for one ship to overtake another, this allowed for a sense of dread to build and to be felt by the crew of ships being overtaken. Modern times have seen a resurgence in the use of this flag and phrase, and while many who fly it are a part of the failed Tea Party movement, many others, like myself, have and fly this flag as a symbol against tyranny. Tyranny being quite simply, “oppressive power”, which can be applied to the approaches used by modern media, activists, and politicians alike. Thomas Jefferson once said, “for I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.” (Jefferson, 1800) In my personal study of the founders** I embraced the writings of Jefferson, Paine, Henry, Mason, Lee, Yates, Singletary, Warren, Clinton, Smith, Fenner, Martin, Samuel Adams, and Monroe as well as others seen to be Anti-Federalists or from who the Anti-Federalists drew their inspiration. How does this apply to the phrase, “Don’t tread on me”? The idea promoted with this phrase is simple, “leave me alone to live in peace, to do what I do best, and as long as my actions do not cause physical harm to others there is no need for your intervention”. Christopher Gadsden, the author of the phrase, made clear his intent to represent an idea to the British overlords at the time when he penned this phrase, attached as it was to a coiled rattlesnake. It seems quite obvious that he believed very strongly in the real separation between England and the colonies, and that his loyalty was also very much in the colonies with his family, friends, and those who wished to see us free of the grip of the corporate overlords of the East India Trading Company and England. Interestingly, there is not much known about this individual, and I have searched everywhere I have access to. Feel free to write a comment below with any links or books that may have additional information on him. So there you have it, the modern use of “Don’t tread on me”, as well as its history – and my somewhat anemic commentary. If you have any added information or knowledge in this arena, comment below. I learn from what others share with me, and from what I study and research. While I feel confident that my knowledge in this arena is extensive, there is always more to learn. Thank you for reading, and of course, commenting and sharing. *When I use the term “man” I am referring to humankind as a whole, using the classic sense of the word. **There were 3 sets of founders, first you have the Declaration authors than the drafters of the Articles of Confederation and lastly the Constitution drafters. These individuals are not the same though there is some minor crossover between them, many of the original Declaration signatories rebelled against the passage of the Constitution, and some of them were very vocal in their belief that this “document” would be a problem in the future.

Hopkins, E. (1776). Founders Online: To George Washington from Commodore Esek Hopkins, 22 May 1776. Retrieved from https://founders.archives.gov/documents 

Hopkins, E. (1776). Founders Online: To George Washington from Commodore Esek Hopkins, 22 May 1776. Retrieved from https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/03-04-02-0300 

Jefferson, T. (1800). Founders Online: From Thomas Jefferson to Benjamin Rush, 23 September 1800. Retrieved from https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-32-02-0102 

Rittman, P. Rise and Fall of the British East India Company. Retrieved from http://paulrittman.com/EastIndiaCompany.pdf 

Walker, R. (2016). The Shifting Symbolism of the Gadsden Flag. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-shifting-symbolism-of-the-gadsden-flag 

https://www.mdcreekmore.com/dont-tread-on-me-what-the-gadsden-flag-means-today/ 

[ :: 12-31-09/1-1-10 New Years Eve Service (first word)  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::]

etc. For the disasters that shall take place are many, the flooding shall be far greater than in times past, the mudslides far greater than in times past, the earthquakes shall be more numerous and far greater than in times past. The tornadoes, oh the savageness of the tornadoes that shall rip across the land, the straight winds, the hurricanes, the forest fires, the volcanoes shall erupt, the rising of the sea level that will be marked not in inches but in feet. etc.. 

:: 12-16-18 Daily Mail :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Volcano on Pacific 'Ring of Fire' erupts in Indonesia sending huge columns of ash spewing 25,000 feet into the sky

Mount Soputan, a 6,000ft volcano in Minahasa in northern Sulawesi island, erupted twice on Sunday morning

Residents have been warned to avoid the peak and told to wear masks in case lava comes flowing down slopes

Soputan is one of more than 120 active volcanoes in Indonesia which is positioned on the Pacific 'Ring of Fire'

By Associated Press Published: 03:26 EST, 16 December 2018 | Updated: 14:51 EST, 16 December 2018

A volcano in central Indonesia has erupted, sending columns of thick ash spewing as high as 25,000 feet into the sky. Mount Soputan, a 6,000ft peak in Minahasa on the northern part of Sulawesi island, erupted twice on Sunday morning. A two-and-a-half mile exclusion zone has been enforced around the mountain as the national disaster agency warns local residents to avoid the peak. Hot ash and lava could come sliding down the volcano's slopes and threaten rivers around the mountain, agency spokesman Sutopo Purwo Nugroho said. Residents were also urged to wear masks in case of ash rain, as authorities kept the volcano's alert level at the second-highest level. Mount Soputan, which stands at 5,853 feet (1,784 metres) tall, is one of Indonesia's more than 120 active volcanoes. Indonesia, an archipelago of more than 260 million people, is prone to earthquakes and volcanic eruptions due to its location on the Pacific 'Ring of Fire.'

:: 12--18 watchermeet-up.forumotion.com :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

by Michael Snyder, The Economic Collapse Blog:

Read More @ TheEconomicCollapseBlog.com

:: 12-11-18 Destination Yisra'el :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

A Blog for the Lost Ten Tribers Awakening to their New Reality

Third Temple of the Jews

09/11/2013

Assad’s WMD and how Israel’s High Holidays have Predicted the World’s Future Events

The War against Syria: G-d’s beginning of Taking Control of His Zion; Damascus

On Wednesday, August 21, 2013, it was reported that President Bashar Assad with the 155th Brigade of the Syrian Army’s 4th Division backed by the Revolutionary Guard and the para-military forces of Iran launched an attack against the Syrian rebels in the outskirts of Damascus. The order for this attack came directly by Syrian President Assad’s younger brother, General Maher Assad. Over a forty eight hours period of time, poisoned gas shells were fired from the big Mount Kalmun army base located south of Damascus, known to be one of three chemical weapon storage facilities, along with Dummar suburbs 5 kilometers outside Damascus, and Al-Safira air base just west of Aleppo. These bases were demanded by Moscow to be the repositories of the chemical weapons in December 2012. As laid out by Secretary of State John Kerry on August 31, 2013 to the American congressional leaders, the Syrian military fired Sarin laced chemical weapons at 11 different sites surrounding the city of Damascus, launched from areas still controlled by the Syrian military regime against districts and neighborhoods which were still controlled by the Syrian controlled rebels. The orders were sent 72 hours earlier to the Syrian chemical weapons teams and pictorial evidence was provided of these gas masked teams preparing these weapons of mass destruction against their own Syrian people. As the Secretary went on to say in his report: Secretary of State John Kerry – “With our own eyes we saw victims writhing in agony from the symptoms of poison gas. We know they were ordinary Syrian citizens who suffered these horrors. We know that the doctors and nurses didn’t need to dress bloody wounds. Not a drop of blood was seen. We saw children dead from Assad’s gas surrounded by parents and grandparents who were victims. The medical staff members treating the wounded were themselves overcome by the poisonous fumes.”There was even a U-Tube that was posted purportedly by Syrians Rebels, that documented the firing of the one of the missiles, but how did these rebels received video evidence that close to ground-zero of the firing line was not known. What is now being revealed is that these videos of this “so-called chemical weapons attack was posted a full day before it was stated to have occurred is now suspected to have only been a “false flag” operation to justify another war, this time to take down the Assad regime as a stepping stone to proceed in attacking Iran. etc. and the extended news article continues

[ :: 10-17-10 am service  (first word)  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. truly darkness, darkness is growing darker and darker and darker, war is being prepared, war is being made ready etc

:: 12-16-18 Technocracy News :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Expert: AI Soldiers Will Develop ‘Moral Compass’ And Defy Orders

Posted By: David Rivers December 16, 2018

It has already been demonstrated that AI algorithms exhibit the biases of their creators, so why not murderous intents as well? Technocrats are so absorbed with their Pollyanna inventions that they cannot see the logical end of their existence. ⁃ TN Editor Murderous robot soldiers will become so advanced they could develop their own moral code to violently defy orders, an AI expert claims. Ex-cybernetics engineer Dr Ian Pearson predicts we are veering towards a future of conscious machines. But if robots are thrust into action by military powers, the futurologist warns they will be capable of conjuring up their own “moral viewpoint”. And if they do, the ex-rocket scientist claims they may turn against the very people sending them out to battle. Dr Pearson, who blogs for Futurizon, told Daily Star Online: “As AI continues to develop and as we head down the road towards consciousness – and it isn’t going to be an overnight thing, but we’re gradually making computers more and more sophisticated – at some point you’re giving them access to moral education so they can learn morals themselves. “You can give them reasoning capabilities and they might come up with a different moral code, which puts them on a higher pedestal than the humans they are supposed to be serving. Asked if this could prove fatal, he responded: “Yes, of course. “If they are in control of weapons and they decide that they are a superior moral being than the humans they are supposed to be guarding, they might make decisions that certain people ought to be killed in order to protect the larger population. “Who knows what decisions they might take? “If you have a guy on a battlefield, telling soldiers to shoot this bunch of people, for whatever reason, but the computer thinks otherwise, the computer is not convinced by it, it might conclude that soldier giving the orders is the worst offender rather than the people he’s trying to kill, so it might turn around and kill him instead. “It’s entirely possible, it depends on how the systems are written.” Dr Pearson’s warning comes amid growing concerns of fully autonomous robots being used in war. Read full story here…

:: 12-16-18 All News Pipeline :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Global Revolt Against Globalism: 'Yellow Vest' Protests Spread Like Wildfire Throughout Europe As The Masses Stand Up To The Elite

December 16, 2018 By Susan Duclos - All News PipeLine

The "Yellow Vest" movement exploded on the scene weeks ago in response to France's decision to increase gas and diesel taxes, with nearly 300,000 taking to the streets in violent protests. Images of burning vehicles, blocked highways and fuel depots, violent battles with police and more were splashed across the globe. By the third weekend of protests, French President Emmanuel Macron blinked and suspended the planned fuel tax increases in an attempt to calm the population, hoping the demonstrations would end. Soon other complaints and concerns started being revealed, such as Macron's planned reforms for next year, described by Bloomberg as "sure-to-be unpopular changes to unemployment insurance and a unification of France’s retirement systems." The interesting thing about the "Yellow Vests," which I have seen some refer to as "Yellow Jackets," protests, is that they are not organized, have no structural leadership, nor any specific organization behind them or funding them. Via City Lab, we see how it began: It’s not just the protests’ fierceness and geographic spread that have taken the country by surprise—French media reported more than 2,000 separate rallies occurring across the country. Unusually, the Yellow Vests is a grassroots mass protest movement with no explicit wider political agenda or links to existing groups. Having organized themselves via social media since May (when the movement was sparked by an online petition), the Yellow Vests have arrived somewhat out of the blue. There is also no clear media consensus as to what they are protesting beyond the cost of gas. To some observers, the protesters are primarily angry about what they see as President Emmanuel Macron’s apparent indifference toward tough conditions for working people. To others, the movement is evidence of a middle-class backlash. Meanwhile, it’s not automatically easy to say whether the protest cleaves more to the left or the right. Make no mistake, gas tax increases was never the underlying issue, that was just the straw that broke the camels back.... in France, but over the past weeks, something truly extraordinary and unprecedented has happened, these Yellow Vest protests have spread throughout Europe, to Belgium, Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, the UK and now Canada, and in each case, there are a different set of issues the demonstrators want to see addressed. GLOBAL REVOLT AGAINST GLOBALISM For example, in Canada the Yellow Vest demonstrators are protesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his government's immigration and tax policies, while in Belgium the populace is rebelling against Prime Minister Charles Michel’s trip to Morocco to sign the United Nations Migration Agreement, which makes no distinction between legal and illegal immigration, with protesters declaring the PM to be a traitor. In the UK, it is pro-Brexit demonstrators and in the Netherlands they generally protested the government economic policies. In Sweden they are protesting against the UN Migration Pact and political elite, and in Germany rail worker protesters in Yellow and Orange vests conducted a four-hour strike over pay. To me this indicates that these "Yellow Vest" protests are not about politics, but are about the people rising up against the elite, it is a global revolt against globalism itself. Note the individual issues these protesters are fighting against, illegal immigration, the highly controversial UN Migration Pact, economic issues where the elite have their boot on the necks of the people struggling to survive and pay their bills, the pro-Brexit campaigners demonstrating as their UK leaders betray them, after they voted to exit the EU...... all globalist agendas with the people revolting against them. Over at the Strategic Culture Foundation website, in a piece titled "The War Against Globalism," the author Philip M. Giraldi, reminds us that while France might have been caught off guard when the initial Yellow Vest protest started, as other European nations are seeing the same protests against their leaders, this type of rebellion, revolt, call it what you will, shouldn't surprise anyone as it has been building as can be seen in the examples he describes, from the Brexit vote in the UK, to the election of Donald Trump to the recent election in Italy. What has been occurring in Belgium, France, with Brexit in Britain, in the recent election in Italy, and also in the warnings coming from Eastern Europe about immigration and European Union community economic policies are driven by the same concerns that operated in America. Government itself is becoming the enemy. And let us not forget the countries that have already felt the lash and been subjected to the social engineering of Angela Merkel – Ireland, Spain, Portugal and Greece. All are weaker economies crushed by the one size fits all of the EURO, which eliminated the ability of some governments to manage their own economies. They and all their citizens are poorer for it. There have been windows in history when the people have had enough abuse and so rise up in revolt. The American and French revolutions come to mind as does 1848. Perhaps we are experiencing something like that at the present time, a revolt against the pressure to conform to globalist values that have been embraced to their benefit by the elites and the establishment in much of the world. It could well become a hard fought and sometimes bloody conflict but its outcome will shape the next century. Will the people really have power in the increasingly globalized world or will it be the 1% with its government and media backing that emerges triumphant? Frankly there are more of "us," than them, even though they own the establishment media, so if these movements continue to grow as they appear to be doing, then the globalists will have no choice but to backpedal or see themselves taken down if a full scale revolution occurs.

:: 12-16-18 All News Pipeline :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Global Revolt Against Globalism: 'Yellow Vest' Protests Spread Like Wildfire Throughout Europe As The Masses Stand Up To The Elite

By Susan Duclos - All News PipeLine December 16, 2018

The "Yellow Vest" movement exploded on the scene weeks ago in response to France's decision to increase gas and diesel taxes, with nearly 300,000 taking to the streets in violent protests. Images of burning vehicles, blocked highways and fuel depots, violent battles with police and more were splashed across the globe. By the third weekend of protests, French President Emmanuel Macron blinked and suspended the planned fuel tax increases in an attempt to calm the population, hoping the demonstrations would end. Soon other complaints and concerns started being revealed, such as Macron's planned reforms for next year, described by Bloomberg as "sure-to-be unpopular changes to unemployment insurance and a unification of France’s retirement systems." The interesting thing about the "Yellow Vests," which I have seen some refer to as "Yellow Jackets," protests, is that they are not organized, have no structural leadership, nor any specific organization behind them or funding them. Via City Lab, we see how it began: It’s not just the protests’ fierceness and geographic spread that have taken the country by surprise—French media reported more than 2,000 separate rallies occurring across the country. Unusually, the Yellow Vests is a grassroots mass protest movement with no explicit wider political agenda or links to existing groups. Having organized themselves via social media since May (when the movement was sparked by an online petition), the Yellow Vests have arrived somewhat out of the blue. There is also no clear media consensus as to what they are protesting beyond the cost of gas. To some observers, the protesters are primarily angry about what they see as President Emmanuel Macron’s apparent indifference toward tough conditions for working people. To others, the movement is evidence of a middle-class backlash. Meanwhile, it’s not automatically easy to say whether the protest cleaves more to the left or the right. Make no mistake, gas tax increases was never the underlying issue, that was just the straw that broke the camels back.... in France, but over the past weeks, something truly extraordinary and unprecedented has happened, these Yellow Vest protests have spread throughout Europe, to Belgium, Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, the UK and now Canada, and in each case, there are a different set of issues the demonstrators want to see addressed. GLOBAL REVOLT AGAINST GLOBALISM For example, in Canada the Yellow Vest demonstrators are protesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his government's immigration and tax policies, while in Belgium the populace is rebelling against Prime Minister Charles Michel’s trip to Morocco to sign the United Nations Migration Agreement, which makes no distinction between legal and illegal immigration, with protesters declaring the PM to be a traitor. In the UK, it is pro-Brexit demonstrators and in the Netherlands they generally protested the government economic policies. In Sweden they are protesting against the UN Migration Pact and political elite, and in Germany rail worker protesters in Yellow and Orange vests conducted a four-hour strike over pay. To me this indicates that these "Yellow Vest" protests are not about politics, but are about the people rising up against the elite, it is a global revolt against globalism itself. Note the individual issues these protesters are fighting against, illegal immigration, the highly controversial UN Migration Pact, economic issues where the elite have their boot on the necks of the people struggling to survive and pay their bills, the pro-Brexit campaigners demonstrating as their UK leaders betray them, after they voted to exit the EU...... all globalist agendas with the people revolting against them. Over at the Strategic Culture Foundation website, in a piece titled "The War Against Globalism," the author Philip M. Giraldi, reminds us that while France might have been caught off guard when the initial Yellow Vest protest started, as other European nations are seeing the same protests against their leaders, this type of rebellion, revolt, call it what you will, shouldn't surprise anyone as it has been building as can be seen in the examples he describes, from the Brexit vote in the UK, to the election of Donald Trump to the recent election in Italy. What has been occurring in Belgium, France, with Brexit in Britain, in the recent election in Italy, and also in the warnings coming from Eastern Europe about immigration and European Union community economic policies are driven by the same concerns that operated in America. Government itself is becoming the enemy. And let us not forget the countries that have already felt the lash and been subjected to the social engineering of Angela Merkel – Ireland, Spain, Portugal and Greece. All are weaker economies crushed by the one size fits all of the EURO, which eliminated the ability of some governments to manage their own economies. They and all their citizens are poorer for it. There have been windows in history when the people have had enough abuse and so rise up in revolt. The American and French revolutions come to mind as does 1848. Perhaps we are experiencing something like that at the present time, a revolt against the pressure to conform to globalist values that have been embraced to their benefit by the elites and the establishment in much of the world. It could well become a hard fought and sometimes bloody conflict but its outcome will shape the next century. Will the people really have power in the increasingly globalized world or will it be the 1% with its government and media backing that emerges triumphant? Frankly there are more of "us," than them, even though they own the establishment media, so if these movements continue to grow as they appear to be doing, then the globalists will have no choice but to backpedal or see themselves taken down if a full scale revolution occurs. 

THIS IS A POPULIST REVOLT AGAINST THE GLOBAL 'ELITE' Many have different specific definitions of "populism," with liberals acting like populism is a dirty word because President Trump was the populist choice, but in reality, all populism really is to make a lengthy description short, is the "people," versus the political elite globalists and globalism supporters. The Heritage back in May 2018 offered a good description of what populism truly is, stating "The core populist contention is that the people, broadly defined, are being screwed over by the elites, either intentionally or not." That matter can be verified empirically. The elites either despise the people or they do not. They either support policies that serve the people or they do not. If the core pillar of populism is true—and broadly speaking, it seems to be, at least in America—then something ought to be done about it, within constitutional norms of course. The concluding sentence in that lengthy, but excellent article, accurately describes what we are watching play out in Europe right now as the writer highlights what Irving Kristol wrote in the 1980s about an earlier wave of populism: "this new populism is no kind of blind rebellion against good constitutional government. It is rather an effort to bring our governing elites to their sense." When President Trump declared he was a nationalist, and proud of it, the liberal establishment media, globalism proponents themselves, melted down, claimed it had "racial" overtones, calling it a "controversial label," as they tried to tie the term into the more controversial "white nationalist," term, yet the definition of Nationalist is "an advocate of or believer in nationalism" which in turn means "loyalty and devotion to a nation." Globalism, on the other hands, means "the operation or planning of economic and foreign policy on a global basis. Why would liberals, Democrats and the establishment media have a problem with a President who declares his loyalty and devotion to America, and who believes that our elected leaders should be representing the best interest of the people that elected them, rather than the global community? Isn't that a President, or leaders job? That is what the election of Donald Trump, Brexit, and the most recent Yellow Vest protests are about in a nutshell, a populist revolt against the global elite. Of course the globalists, liberals, and establishment media would rather blame Russia for the Trump election and the Brexit vote, and now, they are trying to blame Moscow for the Yellow Vest protests as well, rather than acknowledging that the people are simply fed up with their globalist leaders. BOTTOM LINE Europe is burning, perhaps not literally, although we have seen some burning vehicles, but the globalist agenda is being rejected, and if the efforts by the Yellow Vest protests do not bring "governing elites to their sense," which it is beginning to look like they won't, these types of protests are going to get worse, not better. What France and the rest of Europe is starting to look like right now, with hundreds of thousands marching each weekend, is what America would look like if the globalists have their way.

Thankfully the populists, the nationalists, the people, are ready for real change and as I stated above..... there are more of them, than there are of global elites.

:: 12-18-18 Science :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

China and Russia band together on controversial heating experiments to modify the atmosphere

The countries are testing a technology for possible military application, say Chinese scientists involved in the project

Militaries have been in a race to control the ionosphere, which allows radio signals to bounce long distances for communication, for decades

PUBLISHED : Monday, 17 December, 2018, 3:31am UPDATED : Tuesday, 18 December, 2018, 7:37am Stephen Chen

A total of five experiments were carried out in June. One, on June 7, caused physical disturbance over an area as large as 126,000 sq km (49,000 square miles), or about half the size of Britain. The modified zone, looming more than 500km (310 miles) high over Vasilsursk, a small Russian town in eastern Europe, experienced an electric spike with 10 times more negatively charged subatomic particles than surrounding regions. In another experiment on June 12, the temperature of thin, ionised gas in high altitude increased more than 100 degrees Celsius (212 degrees Fahrenheit) because of the particle flux. The particles, or electrons, were pumped into the sky by Sura, an atmospheric heating facility in Vasilsursk built by the former Soviet Union’s military during the cold war. The Sura base fired up an array of high-power antennas and injected a large amount of microwaves into the high atmosphere. The peak power of the high frequency radio waves could reach 260 megawatts, enough to light a small city. Zhangheng-1, a Chinese electromagnetic surveillance satellite, collected the data from orbit with cutting-edge sensors. The pumping and fly-by required precise coordination to achieve effective measurement. When Zhangheng approached the target zone, for instance, the sensors would switch to burst mode to analyse samples every half-second, much faster than usual, to increase data resolution. The results were “satisfactory”, the research team reported in a paper published in the latest issue of the Chinese journal Earth and Planetary Physics. “The detection of plasma disturbances … provides evidence for likely success of future related experiments,” the researchers said. Professor Guo Lixin, dean of the school of physics and optoelectronic engineering at Xidian University in Xian and a leading scientist on ionosphere manipulation technology in China, said that the joint experimentation was extremely unusual. “Such international cooperation is very rare for China,” said Guo, who was not involved in the experiment. “The technology involved is too sensitive.” The sun and cosmic rays produce a large amount of free-flying, positively charged atoms known as ions at altitudes from 75km to 1,000km in the Earth’s upper atmosphere. The layer, or ionosphere, reflects radio waves like a mirror. The ionosphere allows radio signals to bounce long distances for communication. The militaries have been in a race to control the ionosphere for decades. The Sura base in Vasilsursk is believed to be the world’s first large-scale facility built for the purpose. Up and running in 1981, it enabled Soviet scientists to manipulate the sky as an instrument for military operations, such as submarine communication. High-energy microwaves can pluck the electromagnetic field in ionosphere like fingers playing a harp. This can produce very low-frequency radio signals that can penetrate the ground or water – sometimes to depths of more than 100 metres (328 feet) in the ocean, which made it a possible communication method for submarines. Changing the ionosphere over enemy territory can also disrupt or cut off their communication with satellites. The US military learned from the Russian experiment and built a much larger facility to conduct similar tests. The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, or HAARP, was established in Gakona, Alaska, in the 1990s with funding from the US military and the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency. The HAARP facility could generate a maximum 1 gigawatt of power, nearly four times that of Sura. China is now building an even larger and more advanced facility in Sanya, Hainan, with capability to manipulate the ionosphere over the entire South China Sea, according to an earlier report by the South China Morning Post. There have been concerns that such facilities could be used to modify weather and even create natural disasters, including hurricanes, cyclones and earthquakes. The ultra-low frequency waves generated by these powerful facilities could even affect the operation of human brains, some critics have said. Beijing and Taipei team up in space to track earthquakes But Dr Wang Yalu, an associate researcher with the China Earthquake Administration who took part in the study in June, dismissed such theories. “We are just doing pure scientific research. If there is anything else involved, I am not informed about this,” she said in an interview. The earthquake administration was involved because the Zhangheng-1, launched in February, was the first Chinese satellite capable of picking up precursory signals linked to earthquakes. It is operated by the Chinese military and has served both civilian and defence uses. In the China-Russian experiment, researchers found that even with a small power output of 30MW, the radio beam could create a large abnormal zone. But they also found that the effects dropped sharply after sunrise, as the man-made perturbation easily became lost in the noise created by sunlight. “We are not playing God. We are not the only country teaming up with the Russians. Other countries have done similar things,” said another researcher who was involved in the project and asked not to be named because of the sensitivity of the issue. Chang’e 4 launches China’s bid to be first on dark side of the moon The Sura facility has also conducted joint research with France and the United States, according to papers published in academic journals. The National Centre for Space Studies, a French government agency under the supervision of the ministries of defence and research, has deployed the micro satellite Demeter to monitor Sura’s radio emissions. The Defence Meteorological Satellite Programme run by the US Department of Defence also contributed fly-by data in several heating experiments conducted at the Russian site before 2012. The countries were willing to collaborate in part because many scientific and technical problems remain to be solved, the Chinese researcher said. For example, though there is general consensus that human disturbances can cause the irregularities, how they happened and why remains a subject of debate, with different research teams providing varied explanations. Professor Gong Shuhong, a military communication technology researcher at Xidian University, formerly the Radio School of the Central Military Committee, said he had been closely following the Russia-China heating experiment. “The energy emitted was too low to trigger a global environmental event,” he said. “Human influence is still very small compared to the power of Mother Nature. But the impact to a small region is possible.” In theory, a butterfly flapping its wings might be amplified in a sophisticated weather system and cause a storm in a distant location several weeks later. “Such studies must strictly follow ethical guidelines,” Gong said. “Whatever they do, it must not cause harm to the people living on this planet.”

[:: 2-3-14 am service (first word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :::: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

:: 12-15-18 The Jerusalem Post :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

U.S. Navy may stop docking in Haifa after Chinese take over port

Concerns prompt ‘review’ of Shanghai agreement within Israel’s inner security cabinet, sources say.

By Michael Wilner December 15, 2018 21:25

WASHINGTON – The US Navy has acknowledged that its longstanding operations in Haifa may change once a Chinese firm takes over the civilian port in 2021, prompting Israel’s national security cabinet to revisit the arrangement, The Jerusalem Post has learned. Haifa, the nation’s largest port city, regularly hosts joint US-Israeli naval drills and visits from American vessels. But a 2015 agreement between Israel’s Transportation Ministry and Shanghai International Port Group (SIPG) – a company in which the Chinese government has a majority stake – has raised intelligence and security concerns that are only now prompting an interagency review. That agreement granted SIPG control over the port for 25 years. The Chinese company has committed $2 billion to the project and, according to state-run media, plans to transform the port’s bay terminal into the largest harbor in the country. A representative of the Sixth Fleet said the navy’s partnership with Israel remains “steadfast.” “Our US Navy ships frequently visit Haifa, Israel, for both US-Israel bilateral military activity and port calls,” Commander Kyle Raines told the Post, when asked whether China’s coming presence might affect fleet operations in the Mediterranean city. “For now, there are no changes to our operations in Israel,” the commander continued. “I can’t speculate on what might or might not occur in 2021.” Three sources familiar with the matter said that due to concerns that US defense officials privately shared with their Israeli counterparts, the Israeli government has launched “a review of the agreement at a high level,” specifically among members of the inner cabinet. According to one source, several members expressed worry that sensitive infrastructure matters have not been properly vetted by Israel’s full national security cabinet prior to approval. “You don’t want a decision that was made ostensibly for business reasons to have an impact on Israel’s relationship with the American navy,” the source said. The deal was signed off by Israel Katz, who was serving as transportation minister at the time and has remained in the position since. He occupies a seat in the national security cabinet. A senior IDF officer confirmed that the review is under way. But it is unclear whether Israel has any recourse to allay US concerns with the China project, which is already sealed and in motion. “Historically, it’s interesting to see [that] the whole awakening is now when the contract was signed in 2015 – it begs the question what the hype is all about. It’s probably more conducive now because of the US-China tensions over trade, national security and the like,” said Assaf Orion, a retired Israeli brigadier-general and expert on Israel-China relations now based at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. “There is always a question of encouraging investment versus managing risk.” “The bottom line here is that Israel will make a fatal mistake by doing either or both of the following: disregarding China’s potential to advance Israel’s economy, and doing it with our eyes shut,” Orion continued. “We must keep our eyes open, fully aware of the risk management requirements and its possible impact on the US-Israel relationship.” Retired Israeli and American defense and intelligence officials raised concerns throughout the summer that Chinese management of the port might jeopardize America’s operations there. The former head of Israel’s Mossad, Efraim Halevy, sounded an alarm in recent months over the security implications of China’s creeping presence across Israel’s critical infrastructure. And retired admiral Gary Roughead, ex-chief of US naval operations, warned that a Chinese-run seaport in the bay could force the navy to dock its warships elsewhere. “The Chinese port operators will be able to monitor closely US ship movements, be aware of maintenance activity and could have access to equipment moving to and from repair sites and interact freely with our crews over protracted periods,” Roughead remarked during a conference last month at the University of Haifa. “Significantly, the information systems and new infrastructure integral to the ports and the likelihood of information and electronic surveillance systems jeopardize US information and cybersecurity,” he added. Israel has its own security concerns in Haifa to consider as well. The seaport in question is not far from an Israeli navy base where the country maintains its fleet of submarines, which foreign press has reported are capable of carrying and launching nuclear missiles. Domestic critics say that China’s shipping operations in close proximity to the fleet amount to an unacceptable security risk. This would not be the first time that the Sixth Fleet altered its operations in Haifa due to security concerns. In the aftermath of the USS Cole bombing in Yemen in 2000, and during the Second Intifada, the frequency of port calls fell dramatically and USO Haifa was permanently shuttered. But neither of those events were within Israeli government control. The Prime Minister’s Office, Transportation Ministry and Foreign Ministry declined requests for comment on this report. Herb Keinon contributed to this report.

[ :: 8-28-16 am service second word  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

For the world has become very evil and they desire the evil more than they desire those things that are righteous and they desire to walk the way of the evil.  You can even see it in the elections, they are willing to accept the evil and reject that which would be good.  This is a sign that you have crossed the line, that there is no turning back, that my judgment must come upon the face of the earth, etc

:: 12-16-18 Neon Nettle :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Body of Woman Who Died in Mexico Returned to Family with Eyes and Heart Missing 41-year-old Amanda Gill's family suspects organ trafficking by Mexican doctors 

By: Jay Greenberg |@NeonNettle on 16th December 2018 @ 1.20pm

Neon Nettle on 16th December 2018 @ 1.20pm

The body of a British woman, who died in Mexico, was flown back to her home country with her brain, heart, eyes, and other organs missing. 41-year-old Amanda Gill's body was returned to her family in the UK after being harvested in the Mexican hospital after she passed away. Elaine Hines said her daughter Amanda fell victim to illegal organ traffickers, and suspects doctors where she was treated may have been involved, reported the Daily Mail. “They stole everything inside her,” she said. “If this has happened to Amanda how many other people has it ­happened to and will again?” Hines said. “Where are my sister’s beautiful blue eyes?” Amanda’s sister, Katie Miller-Gill, asked. “Why were they taken from her? Where is her brain, her heart?” According to the Epoch Times, Amanda’s sister said the family may have considered donating her organs, and she now thinks that Mexican criminals stole the organs under the belief that her family wouldn’t follow up on the case. No officials contacted the family about the woman’s organs. Hines died at Hospital de Cos following diabetes complications while she was traveling in the country. Hospital officials said they don’t know what happened to the organs, according to the publication. Hospital authorities told The Mirror that her body was passed to police in a sealed bag. No officials have taken responsibility for the woman’s missing organs, Gill’s family told the Mirror. “Did they do it to her because she was foreign? Did they steal her ­organs for the illegal trade?” asked a family member in the report. “We just don’t know. We haven’t got the ­answers we wanted.” Her family also doesn’t understand why she died. “The hospital said she wouldn’t take fluids but the first thing you do is put them on a drip and that brings them round. It isn’t something that would have killed her,” said a family member. Mexican ­officials said her cause of death was “visceral congestion,” which according to the report, perplexed pathologists in the UK. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office told the outlet, “Our staff are supporting the family of a British woman following her death in Mexico, and we have conveyed their concerns about the handling of her remains to the Mexican mortuary services.” Organ Harvesting Criminal gangs in Mexico have been long accused of organ harvesting. In 2014, the Guardian reported that an alleged drug trafficker from the Caballeros Templarios (Knights Templar) cartel was arrested for kidnapping children to kill and harvest their organs. Jose Manuel Mireles said that vigilantes in Michoacan State stopped a truck driving in the area before discovering the children in a refrigerated container. “The children were still alive and wrapped in blankets,” Mireles was quoted by the Guardian as saying. “They were all from the same school in Mexico City and their parents had let them go because they were told they were going on a trip to the beach.” Mexican cartels, especially the Caballeros Templarios, are known to engage in illegal activity other than drug trafficking, including kidnapping, organ pilfering, and even exporting iron ore to China. China, meanwhile, has been accused of carrying out state-sanctioned large-scale organ harvesting for the past decade or more. Various religious groups who are known to not drink or smoke, particularly practitioners of the persecuted Falun Gong spiritual discipline, are targeted for their organs by Chinese communist officials. Falun Gong, also known as a Falun Dafa, is a spiritual practice based on meditative exercises and moral teachings centered on three principles: truthfulness, compassion, and tolerance, according to its website. But in China, it’s been subjected to brutal persecution since July 1999, with widespread reports of torture, brainwashing, forced labor, extrajudicial killings, and organ harvesting in labor camps throughout the country. Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) highlighted the Chinese Communist Party’s campaign of organ harvesting this week. “The Chinese government and Communist Party’s ongoing efforts to eradicate Falun Gong practice is a black mark on recent Chinese history. "The CCP’s need to control even the consciences of the Chinese people has led to horrific human rights abuses, torture, arbitrary detention, and organ harvesting,” said Smith on Dec. 3. Investigations by the International Coalition to End Transplant Abuse in China, an ethics group consisting of medical doctors, lawyers, academics, and other researchers, said that a significant number of Falun Gong practitioners have been killed for their organs for profit.

:: 12--18 The Common Sense Show :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Is President Trump Planning to Declare Martial Law In California?

One of the more challenging tasks in this business is to separate the real from the phony. The second most challenging thing is to learn to connect the dots of certain events which tells an important story of what is coming, or is already underway. This story contains all of these challenges and more. There have been a series of events that have led some to wonder if President Trump is going to declare martial law in California after Christmas. This article examines the related events which could culminate in the biggest constitutional crisis since the civil war. Cancelled Leaves and “Strange Training” Over the past month, I have received several notifications from people claiming to be regular military who are engaged in cancelled leaves and somewhat bizarre training activities, without explanation. This view is captured in the following communication:

Dear Sir, I first found out about your show from my father-in-law who follows you everyday. In the times I have listened to you or read your articles, I feel like you are on our training exercises with us and I am referring to Jade Helm which I was a part of. .We specialize in extraction of key personnel, usually hostile, but sometimes they are friendlies in distress. We are frequently engaged in urban warfare exercises but this is not the Middle East we are training for. There is no question that we are training for military activities on American soil. We have even practiced arresting high profile people. We have also trained to apprehend drug dealers in fortified crack houses. This is something that we have never had to do before and marks a change in a training regimen. My unit just practiced an extraction in the midst of civil unrest. All of my unit is confident that we are talking about training for action in America in an urban setting which is usually marked by civil unrest, but we are not concerned with the unrest as it is left to supporting units to contain the trouble. You might think that I will be giving you information but I have nothing. Can you look into this but your going to have to do this without our logistics and mission details because that would identify who we are? What the hell are we training for? We are concerned for our families and how they could be affected by this. At the time I received this, I had nothing specific to pin this to. Military organizations like NORTHCOM routinely practice for these kinds of scenarios. However, I received several communications from military personnel about cancelled leaves from military personnel with questions about whether we were preparing to go to war with Russia and/or China. However, as I looked at some of the anecdotes from these communications, it looks as if America is preparing to go to war with itself. A New Communication I had a conversation with one of my best military intel sources and they said that if events “go south”, we could see America be put under martial law immediately after Christmas. I told the source I had just received information to this effect which he had me read to him. I was sent a hastily prepared article which said that President Trump would declare martial law right after Christmas and this held as much credibility for me as the claims of 60,000 sealed indictments to be acted upon by Thanksgiving…..However, what caught my eye in this article was use of the Insurrection Act of 1807 as the justification to do just what was being claimed. I have previously been told in response to my questions about why Trump has not acted against the sedition of Governor Brown and the Mayor of Oakland and I was told that if Trump acted against California’s sedition and treason, it would be under the Insurrection Act. The Insurrection Act is the set of laws passed in 1807 that govern the U.S. President’s ability to deploy troops within the U.S. to put down lawlessness, insurrection and rebellion. After reading the act, I believe that Trump has the justification to act against California officials in the manner prescribed by the Insurrection act. I promptly called Paul Preston who is the head of the New California movement which will create a 51st state arising out of California. The movement is constitutional and progressing very quickly as the majority of California’s counties have signed on in order to escape the tyranny of the Democratically controlled state government. I told Paul what I have learned about urban training by our troops, and that certain troops were on alert and leaves had been cancelled. I asked him point blank, if this true. He said he could minimally confirm some but not all of the questions that I was asking him in the affirmative. However, he said that he was limited on what he could answer. Instead of answering these questions directly, he referred me to the following excerpt written by a University of Tennessee law professor. After reading the article, which is posted on the New California website, I believe that I have my answers. Law Professor, New California and Martial Law University of Tennessee law professor Glenn Harlan Reynolds sees the following scenario as a possibility not out of the question in the near future. This was posted on the New California website. “In the summer of 2021, following the California financial crisis and CalPers pension collapse, public employee-supporting Democrats from the California General Assembly absented themselves from the state, preventing a quorum so that legislation slashing pension payouts could not be passed. “That absence stretched from days into weeks, as the state government largely shut down for lack of funding. Seizing on this moment, 34 counties from the eastern and rural parts of what was then California organized themselves and sent representatives to Fresno, where those representatives declared themselves the new, official California General Assembly and designated individuals of their choice as the new, official governor and attorney general. “The new legislature and officials were quickly recognized by President Donald Trump, who, citing his authority under the Insurrection Actand Article IV section 4 of the United States Constitution, deemed them the official government of the state, and sent federal troops from the 101st Airborne Division to Fresno to ensure that what he called ‘leftovers’ of the ‘old, failed state government’ were unable to ’cause trouble.’ President Trump’s recognition was echoed in a joint resolution of the Republican-controlled Congress, which perhaps anticipated the addition of two new Republican senators.”…. From all that I am learning, the law professor’s prediction of 2021 is not accurate. I believe we are in the middle of this happening right now. Martial law in California could lead a partial purge of of the Deep State. In addition, if the President gained a foothold over California, it could serve as a springboard to do the same in the rest of America. Predictive Programming I have concluded that President Trump wants this information out, but he has to remain detached so he has the authority to act, in California, without being accused of malice of forethought. In other words, he is not acting for political gain, but to preserve the union which he is constitutionally mandated to do so. Many who have followed my work, knows that I have written extensively on predictive programming. I believe that this law professor’s work is a case of predictive programming. I also believe that using an obscure website to promote the notion of martial law under the Insurrection Act is predictive programming coming from the White House. Further, the soldiers who have contacted me with stories of training anomalies are telling the factual side of what is coming. The following statement is not meant to be construed as coming DIRECTLY from Paul Preston. However, there is a reason why this law professor’s article is on the New California website and why I was directed to read the article when several of my questions were going unanswered. This movement is a peaceful movement. They are not officially asking for federal government intervention. However, federal intervention would seal the deal on behalf of New California. My betting money is that Trump is going to take action against Governor Jerry Brown and some very corrupt California state officials. Full blown martial law? It would be a way to get control of a previously democratic state, but more important, the obstruction and seditious ways of California could be curtailed. I am interviewing Paul Preston on Wednesday evening. The archives of The Common Sense Radio Show Are Available on Megaphone. The way to access them is to go to either Google Play, I-Tunes or Spotify. The shows are listed under The Common Sense Show

:: 12-14-18 The Washington Examiner :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

ICE arrested more than 80,000 illegal immigrants in 2018 with DUI charges, convictions

by Anna Giaritelli | December 14, 2018 06:49 PM

More than a quarter of a million people illegally present in the United States were removed from the country in fiscal year 2018, according to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Approximately half of the 158,000 people arrested by ICE — 80,730 — had been charged or convicted of driving under the influence, according to the agency's annual report. The second-highest category for arrests was for crimes related to "dangerous drugs," followed by traffic offenses. Immigration offenses — like having been deported once before — was a common denominator for more than 63,000 of the people arrested. More than 50,000 people taken into custody had been charged or convicted on assault. Exactly 23,052 people had faced legal trouble for obstructing judiciary, Congress, legislature, etc. The criminal backgrounds are the reasons they were known to law enforcement and pursued by ICE. More than half of the total 256,085 people who were removed from the country were Mexican citizens, making it the country with the most nationals deported from the U.S. A little more than 141,000 Mexicans were removed. Mexico, part of North America, was followed by the three northernmost countries in Central America: Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador, respectively. Guatemala had approximately 50,000 citizens repatriated. Honduras received 28,894 citizens and El Salvador, 15,445. The Dominican Republican, Brazil, Ecuador, and Colombia were next, with between 1,100 and 1,800 repatriated citizens each. China and India were also among the countries with the most citizens returned, though nowhere near the rates of the top countries. Both nations had 726 and 611 citizens repatriated, respectively.

[  :: 2-2-13 am service  (first word)  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc.. Throughout the world right now peace is fastly disappearing, wars are rising up, trouble on the right hand, trouble on the left hand, etc..

:: 12-16-18 The Express :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

World War 3: Satellite images show HUNDREDS of Russian tanks massing on Ukraine border

HUNDREDS of Russian tanks look poised for a mass invasion of Ukraine as tensions over Crimea threaten to boil over.

By Tom Nellist PUBLISHED: 09:51, Sun, Dec 16, 2018 | UPDATED: 14:24, Sun, Dec 16, 2018

Latest satellite imagery shows Russian defence forces assembling hundreds of tanks at a new military base near the town of Kamensk-Shakhtinksy just over 10 miles from the Ukraine border. Updated images from Google Earth taken in November shows the large-scale military base is being equipped with T-64 and T-62M tanks as well as thousands of military trucks, artillery systems and tankers. The base is near the rebel held territory of eastern Ukraine where Russia has been accused of backing separatists fighters clashing with pro-Ukrainian government forces. The commander of Ukraine’s armed forces has said Russia now poses the greatest military threat since it annexed Crimea in 2014. General Viktor Muzhenko said the satellite images show at least 250 Russian tanks assembled near the border in the space of just two weeks. He said: “In front of us is an aggressor who has no legal, moral or any other limits. "It is very difficult to predict when it will occur to him to begin active combat actions against Ukraine.” General Muzhenko said the tanks assembled in the run up to the Kerch Strait incident in which Russia captured Ukrainian ships and more than 20 naval officers. Moscow has still not released the men and Ukraine has accused it of a concerted effort to mobilise its tanks in the run up to the incident. Mr Muzhenko added: “This was an act of aggression from regular forces, the border service (of the Russian Federation) in relation to the Ukrainian armed forces.” The Kremlin has denied the accusations, saying Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko is stirring anti-Russian sentiment ahead of elections. Mr Poroshenko introduced martial law last week in parts of Ukraine he believes to be most at risk from Russian attacks. The Ukrainian President warned the initial period of 30 days could be extended after an assessment at the end of the period. He said: “The term of martial law depends on the Russian Federation. “Based on how it will increase its capabilities, how it will react, how it will provoke and carry out such provocations - not like in the Kerch Strait but also on a larger scale - the legal regime that will be defined in Ukraine depends on it.” The conflict in eastern Ukraine has already killed more than 10,000 people despite a ceasefire. Ukraine is expecting to finish the building of a military base near the Azov Sea, near to where last month’s Kerch Strait incident happened. Kiev’s allies, led by the United States, are sending in support and equipment such as air and naval reconnaissance, boats and weapons for ground troops. A Pentagon spokesman confirmed American military officials will meet with Ukrainian counterparts this week with a meeting scheduled between US Naval Operations Admiral John Richardson and Ukraine’s navy commander Admiral Ihor Voronchenko. The spokesman said: “(Pentagon) leaders will reiterate US support for Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognised borders, extending to its territorial waters, as well as the right of its vessels to traverse international waters.”

:: 12-16-18 The Express :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

World War 3 WARNING: Small ‘miscalculation’ over disputed islands could spark MAJOR crisis

A CHAIN of disputed islands in the East China Sea could provide the flashpoint for an "uncontrollable crisis" between China and Japan, a leading think tank has warned.

By Harvey Gavin PUBLISHED: 08:00, Sun, Dec 16, 2018 | UPDATED: 13:08, Sun, Dec 16, 2018

Escalating tensions in the region have seen warplanes from the rival nations frequently scrambled to the skies above the Senkaku Islands, which are claimed by both Tokyo and Beijing. But the increasing number of sorties in the area combined with the presence of China’s militarised coast guard has “substantially increased” the risk of a miscalculation which could spark a major crisis, a study by the RAND Corporation found. The major think tank warned that “fighter planes from both countries now routinely fly in close proximity to one another” over the islands which has raised the risk of forces firing on each other or of a mid-air collision. And while the report said neither Tokyo or Beijing would benefit from such an incident escalating into full-blown war, it warned “the tense standoff carries a growing risk of miscalculation”. The report says: “Given the state of tensions in the East China Sea, an accidental collision could quickly spiral into an uncontrollable crisis between the two countries.” The uninhabited Senkaku Islands, which sit between the north coast of Taiwan and the Japanese Home Islands, are administered by Japan, but face rival claims from China and Taiwan. The rocky outcrops have become the site of increasingly aggressive incursions by Chinese vessels in recent months as Beijing seeks to assert its dominance in the region. And while the islands themselves are of little value, the strategic location in key waterways combined with the possibility of lucrative gas fields and fishing grounds nearby mean Japan is determined to defend them. In response to the growing threat, the Japanese military is reportedly drawing up emergency battle plans to counter an invasion. Japan is also preparing to equip its military with its first aircraft carrier since World War Two - along with dozens of US-made F-35 fighter jets. Meanwhile, China is seeking “to overtake Japan as the dominant power in the region” against a backdrop of a “deepening mutual distrust” with Japan, according to the RAND report. It concludes: “While an unexpected crisis escalating to war is not in the interest of either country, the concentrated presence of military and paramilitary air and maritime platforms increases the risk of a miscalculation occurring. “Careful management of this potential flashpoint will test the leadership and skills of Japan, the United States, and China in the coming years.”

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1058689/world-war-3-china-japan-senkaku-islands 

[:: 2-3-14 am service (first word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :::: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

:: 12-16-18 Autz Sheva 7 :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Yair Netanyahu: There will never be peace with 'Palestinians'

Prime Minister's son temporarily banned from Facebook for criticizing social media giant after hoping terrorists are brought to justice.

David Rosenberg, 16/12/18 20:15

Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s son Yair Netanyahu was temporarily banned from the social media network Facebook on Sunday, after he criticized the company’s decision to censor one of his posts. On Sunday, Yair Netanyahu, an employee at the Shurat Hadin Israel Law Center, posted a message on Facebook expressing hope that the deaths of Israeli Jews murdered in terror attacks would be avenged, adding that he did not believe peace was possible with the Palestinian Authority. In October, an Arab terrorist, Ashraf Na’alwa, murdered Ziv Hajbi and Kim Levengrond-Yehezkel during an attack in the Barkan industrial zone in Samaria. On Thursday, IDF soldiers attempting to apprehend Na’alwa shot and killed him when he opened fire on the Israeli security forces. That day, two Israeli soldiers were killed by Hamas terrorists in a shooting attack outside of the town of Givat Assaf in Samaria. “May the memory of the murdered be a blessing,” wrote Netanyahu. “I hope that we merit to see their deaths avenged, as happened last night with the murderer who killed Kim and Ziv in the Barkan terror attack. There will never be peace with the monsters in the form of humans who have been called ‘Palestinians’ since 1964. We need to encourage them to emigrate from our country to the 22 states of their fellow [Arabs].” Shortly thereafter, however, Facebook removed the comment, saying only that it did not conform to the company’s rules. When Netanyahu posted a follow-up comment criticizing Facebook for removing his comment while permitting radical Islamic groups and terrorist organizations to maintain entire pages on the social media outlet, Facebook issued a 24-hour ban on Netanyahu. “The digital police of the radical progressives at Facebook have gotten to me this time! Mazel Tov! Facebook has official pages for groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Iranian regime. And there are an endless amount of pages calling for the destruction of Israel and the murder of Jews. There are thousands of violent, radical posts from leftists against me and against my family, including threats of physical violence and threats of murder.” “None of this violates Facebook’s community rules. They are protected as ‘free speech’. The right-wing around the world needs to wake up. The only outlet we have is social media, since the established media outlets are controlled entirely by the radical left (in Israel, as well as in the US and Europe). Now they’re trying to shut out mouths in the one place we’ve had the right to express our opinion.” After posting the message, Facebook issued a 24-hour ban on Netanyahu’s account. He responded shortly thereafter via Twitter, noting that Facebook had erased the comment within minutes of his posting it. “It is simply unbelievable. Facebook has blocked me for 24 hours because I criticized them. Computer dictatorship.” “What is even more amazing is that they erased the comment within five minutes. When I tell Facebook about people calling for the murder of Jews, they take a month to respond to me, and then only to say that the post “does not violate our community rules”.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/256256 

:: 12-16-18 The Times of Israel :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Father of Strasbourg shooter says son supported Islamic State

Abdelkrim Chekatt said he tried to convince Cherif Chekatt to quit backing terror group, went to police after attack fearing he was involved

By AP 16 December 2018, 5:37 am

PARIS, France — The man described as the father of the 29-year-old suspect in this week’s deadly Christmas market attack in Strasbourg says his son subscribed to the beliefs of the Islamic State group. The interview with Abdelkrim Chekatt by the state-run France 2 television channel was shown Saturday night, two days after the son was killed in a confrontation with three police officers in his childhood neighborhood in Strasbourg following a massive manhunt. Four people died in the Tuesday night attack. A dozen others were wounded. The Christmas market in the eastern city of Strasbourg, seat of the European Parliament, is the largest in France. It reopened on Friday after being closed during the search for the suspect. Chekatt said he had seen his son, Cherif Chekatt, three days before the attack but couldn’t contact him while he was on the run. He acknowledged that his son backed the IS group. “He’d say, for example, that Daesh, fights for the just cause and all that,” the red-bearded father said, using the common term in France and elsewhere for the Islamic State group. The interview, initially outdoors with the father, continued briefly inside with Cheriff Chekatt’s mother, Rouadja Rouag, who expressed shock and sorrow for the deaths. France 2 said the couple had been divorced for a long time. Abdelkrim Chekatt, a French-Algerian, said he’d tried in the past to dissuade his son from backing the Islamic State, saying, “You don’t see the atrocities they commit.” The son would reply that “it’s not them,” the father said. Shortly after Chekatt’s death, the Islamic State group’s Amaq news agency claimed he was a “soldier” of the group. French Interior Minister Christophe Castaner rejected the claim as “totally opportunistic.” The father and mother and two siblings of the suspected killer were among seven people held for questioning. French media reported that the family members were released. The three others, still in custody, are unrelated but close to Chekatt. The young Chekatt had been on a French intelligence watch list for radicalism and was convicted 27 times for criminal offenses — the first time at age 13 — mainly in France but also in Germany and Switzerland. Investigators are trying to determine whether he had accomplices or logistical support. The father said he went to police of his own accord and on a suspicion the night of the son’s rampage with a handgun and a knife. He said he told police that “if ever you locate Cherif, tell me. I’ll go to him and try to reason with him to give up.” He also said that if his son had told him about a project to kill “I would have denounced him, and he wouldn’t have killed or been killed.”

[ :: 12-31-13/1-1-14 New Year’s Eve Service (first word)  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  ::]

[ :: 10-30-13 pm service  (first word)  :: ::  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. I have told you to have enough food, generator for three months, how long, for three months. Not three years, not six years, not seven years. Man says many things, but it does not line up with my word, but I shall be giving unto you my word that you may know, you must prepare now, you must get your house in order now, these things, these things are important. etc.. 

:: 12-11-18 What really Happened :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Profound Threat: Americans are being urged prepare for the up to six months without electricity, transportation, fuel, money, and healthcare….

Submitted by newsguy76 on Tue, 12/11/2018 - 16:22

GOV'T SLAVES

Everything you've been taught is a lie! © 2008-2018

[ :: 9-23-12 pm service  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :::: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::  ::  ::] 

::  Sep 23, 2015 The Atlantic :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Engineering Humans for War

Inside the Pentagon’s efforts to create a super-soldier—and change the future of the battlefield

Annie Jacobsen

Retired four-star general Paul F. Gorman recalls first learning about the “weakling of the battlefield” from reading S.L.A. Marshall, the U.S. Army combat historian during World War II. After interviewing soldiers who participated in the Normandy beach landings, Marshall had learned that fatigue was responsible for an overwhelming number of casualties. “I didn’t know my strength was gone until I hit the beach,” Sergeant Bruce Hensley told Marshall. “I was carrying part of a machine gun. Normally I could run with it … but I found I couldn’t even walk with it. … So I crawled across the sand dragging it with me. I felt ashamed of my own weakness, but looking around I saw the others crawling and dragging the weights they normally carried.” Another officer told of the effects of “fear and fatigue.”“Soldiers get tired and soldiers get fearful,” Gorman told me last year. “Frequently, soldiers just don’t want to fight. Attention must always be paid to the soldier himself.” For decades after its inception in 1958, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency—DARPA, the central research and development organization of the Department of Defense—focused on developing vast weapons systems. Starting in 1990, and owing to individuals like Gorman, a new focus was put on soldiers, airmen, and sailors—on transforming humans for war. The progress of those efforts, to the extent it can be assessed through public information, hints at war’s future, and raises questions about whether military technology can be stopped, or should. Gorman sketched out an early version of the thinking in a paper he wrote for DARPA after his retirement from the Army in 1985, in which he described an “integrated-powered exoskeleton” that could transform the weakling of the battlefield into a veritable super-soldier. The “SuperTroop” exoskeleton he proposed offered protection against chemical, biological, electromagnetic, and ballistic threats, including direct fire from a .50-caliber bullet. It “incorporated audio, visual, and haptic [touch] sensors,” Gorman explained, including thermal imaging for the eyes, sound suppression for the ears, and fiber optics from the head to the fingertips. Its interior would be climate-controlled, and each soldier would have his own physiological specifications embedded on a chip within his dog tags. “When a soldier donned his ST [SuperTroop] battledress,” Gorman wrote, “he would insert one dog-tag into a slot under the chest armor, thereby loading his personal program into the battle suit’s computer,” giving the 21st-century soldier an extraordinary ability to hear, see, move, shoot, and communicate. At the time Gorman wrote, the computing technology needed for such a device did not yet exist. By 2001, however, DARPA had unveiled two exoskeleton programs, and by 2013, in partnership with U.S. Special Operations Command, DARPA had started work on a super-soldier suit called TALOS (Tactical Assault Light Operator Suit) unlike anything in the history of warfare. Engineered with full-body ballistics protection; integrated heating and cooling systems; embedded sensors, antennas, and computers; 3D audio (to indicate where a fellow warfighter is by the sound of his voice); optics for vision in various light conditions; life-saving oxygen and hemorrhage controls; and more, TALOS is strikingly close to the futuristic exoskeleton that Gorman first envisioned for DARPA 25 years ago, and aims to be “fully functional” by 2018. “I am here to announce that we are building Iron Man,” President Barack Obama said of the suit during a manufacturing innovation event in 2014. When the president said, “This has been a secret project we’ve been working on for a long time,” he wasn’t kidding. * * * It was the collapse of the Soviet Union that accelerated many of DARPA’s most radical super-soldier science programs. The revelation that the Soviets had developed an extensive biological-weapons program caused DARPA to bring biologists into its ranks, and with the life sciences at the fore, DARPA began to look inside the human body, toward a scientific capability that could transform soldiers from the inside out.

In 1999 DARPA created the Defense Sciences Office (DSO) and made Michael Goldblatt its director. Goldblatt was a biologist and venture capitalist from the Midwest who, during the food-related national health scare that followed three children’s deaths from eating E. coli-contaminated hamburgers at Jack in the Box restaurants, became hyper-aware of pathogens. “A guy I was working with, Alvin Chow, and I came up with a technology for self-sterilizing packages … that sterilized products in the field,” he told me in a 2014 interview. Thinking the technology could be useful to the government, he called Larry Lynn, the director of DARPA. “I told Larry … how [the self-sterilizing packages] could be used in field hospitals or on the battlefield. Larry was blown away. He said, ‘We want you to come to DARPA.’ And I did.” The turn of the century “was a radical time to be at DARPA,” Goldblatt said. He believed that defense sciences could demonstrate that “the next frontier was inside of our own selves,” and he became a pioneer in military-based transhumanism—the notion that man can alter the human condition fundamentally by augmenting the body with machines and other means. At the time, the threat from biological warfare was in his words “growing far faster than the solutions were coming in. … [President] Clinton gave lots of money to the countermeasures program for unconventional pathogens,” with the result that DARPA had plenty of funding for biology programs. Goldblatt saw the creation of the super-soldier as imperative to 21st-century warfare. Goldblatt ran the DSO until 2004, and when he spoke to me last year, he could only describe unclassified programs. More than 10 years after his departure, the status of the “super-soldier” pursuits he helped launch is murky; DARPA’s highest-risk, highest-payoff programs remain secret until they are unveiled on the battlefield. Still, given the progress of the exoskeleton, these or similar programs could be closer to reality than anyone realizes. “Soldiers having no physical, physiological, or cognitive limitation will be key to survival and operational dominance in the future,” Goldblatt told his program managers a few weeks after his arrival. One program in the DSO, called Persistence in Combat, addressed three areas that slowed soldiers down on the battlefield: pain, wounds, and excessive bleeding. Goldblatt hired a biotechnology firm to develop a pain vaccine. If a soldier got shot, Goldblatt explained, the vaccine would “reduce the pain triggered by inflammation and swelling,” the desired result being “10 to 30 seconds of agony then no pain for 30 days.” Such a vaccine would allow the warfighter to keep fighting so long as bleeding could be stopped. To develop new ways to try to stop bleeding, Goldblatt initiated another program that involved injecting millions of microscopic magnets into a person, which could later be brought together into a single area to stop bleeding with the wave of a wand. Another idea was to find a way to get a wounded soldier to go into a kind of hibernation, or suspended animation, until help arrived. Achieving this goal would give a soldier precious hours, or even days, to survive blood loss and avoid going into shock while awaiting evacuation or triage. Bears hibernate. Why can’t man? Could a chemical compound produce such a state? Sleep, too, was a focus of intense research at DSO. In the Continually Assisted Performance program, scientists worked on ways to create a “24/7 soldier,” one who required little or no sleep for up to seven days. If this could be achieved, an enemy’s need for sleep would put him at an extreme disadvantage. Goldblatt’s program managers hired marine biologists studying certain sea animals to look for clues. Whales and dolphins don’t sleep; as mammals, they would drown if they did. Unlike humans, they are somehow able to control the lobes of their left and right brains so that while one lobe sleeps, the opposite lobe stays awake, allowing the animal to swim. While some DARPA scientists ruminated over the question of how humans might one day control the lobes of their own brains, other scientists experimented with drugs like Modafinil, a powerful medication used to counter sleep apnea and narcolepsy, to keep warfighters awake. Other programs explored other questions. What if soldiers could have 10 times the muscle endurance of enemy soldiers? What if they could leap seven feet or do 300 pull-ups a day? Under the DSO banner, in a program called the Brain-Machine Interface, DARPA scientists studied how brain implants could enhance cognitive ability. The program’s first goal was to create “a wireless brain modem for a freely moving rat,” DARPA’s Eric Eisenstadt stated at a technology conference in 2002.The scientists would implant a chip in the rat’s brain to see if they could remotely control the animal’s movements. “The objective of this effort,” Eisenstadt explained, “is to use remote teleoperation via direct interconnections with the brain.” The bigger objective was to allow future “soldiers [to] communicate by thought alone. … Imagine a time when the human brain has its own wireless modem so that instead of acting on thoughts, warfighters have thoughts that act,” Eisenstadt suggested. But a 2008 report by defense scientists raised some warnings. “An adversary might use” brain technology “in military applications. … An extreme example would be remote guidance or control of a human being.” Other critics said that the quest to enhance human performance on the battlefield would lead scientists down a morally dangerous path. Michael Goldblatt disagreed. “How is having a cochlear implant that helps the deaf hear any different than having a chip in your brain that could help control your thoughts?” he asked. When questioned about unintended consequences, like controlling humans for nefarious ends, Goldblatt insisted, “There are unintended consequences for everything.” This article has been excerpted from Annie Jacobsen's new book, The Pentagon's Brain: An Uncensored History of DARPA, America's Top-Secret Military Research Agency.

[ :: 5-15-11 am service (first word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::  ::]

etc. But it is not an exciting time for the lukewarm or the ungodly, it shall be a terrible time, a time of a dictator, a dictator government that dictates, that takes away your rights, that takes away your freedoms, that takes away the things that you have, the things that you never expected that they would control, they shall control. Oh, what an hour is just ahead. etc..

:: 12-11-18 Breitbart :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

NJ State Police: ‘No Plans to Go Door-to-Door’ to Enforce Magazine Ban

On December 11, 2018, Breitbart News reported on our correspondence with the New Jersey State Police (NJSP), learning that they would not rule out going house-to-house, or door-to-door, to enforce the new “high-capacity” magazine ban. New Jersey’s new ban, which took effect during the midnight hour of Tuesday, December 11, makes it a felony to possess a magazine holding more than ten rounds. We asked the NJSP if they would be enforcing this ban on a traffic stop-basis — checking magazines in firearms when they pulled over drivers for speeding, reckless driving, etc. — or whether they would enforce it by going to house-to-house to check the capacity of magazines owned by New Jersey residents. Rather than ruling that option out, they responded: “We do not discuss enforcement strategies.” NJSP contacted Breitbart News on the night of December 11, offering a second statement which went further than the first. They said: “While we do not discuss our enforcement strategies, there are no plans to go door-to-door to enforce this current ban.” Breitbart News is still waiting for Daniel Bryan, Gov. Phil Murphy’s (D) press secretary, to explain how the governor expects his ban to be enforced. On Monday we asked Bryan questions that were similar to those we asked the NJSP, and he has not answered as of the publication of this article. AWR Hawkins is an award-winning Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News, the host of the Breitbart podcast Bullets with AWR Hawkins, and the writer/curator of Down Range with AWR Hawkins, a weekly newsletter focused on all things Second Amendment, also for Breitbart News. He is the political analyst for Armed American Radio. Follow him on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com. Sign up to get Down Range at breitbart.com/downrange.

:: 12-12-18 Activist Post :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

The Deep State Wants Your Guns

TOPICS:José Niño December 12, 2018

https://www.activistpost.com/2018/12/the-deep-state-wants-your-guns.html 

:: 12-11-18 Hal Turner radio show :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

World News

ISRAEL PUTS TROOPS ON LEBANON BORDER; LEBANON NOW DEPLOYING TROOPS TO FACE THEM

Category: World News Tuesday, 11 December 2018 15:04

A large number of reinforcements from the Lebanese Army poured into the Nabatieh Governorate of southern Lebanon this afternoon. According to a military source, the Lebanese Army deployed these reinforcements near the United Nations’ “blue line” in the town of Mays Al-Jabal. Sources say Israel is planning a military attack upon Lebanon "around Christmas" while the world is distracted by the holiday." The reinforcements were sent by the Lebanese Army in response to the large buildup of Israeli troops along the border of the Upper Galilee region. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) is currently digging at several border-towns near the United Nations’ blue line; they have increased their presence in the area over the least 72 hours. Hezbollah is the entity which won election and runs the government of Lebanon. The US and Israel classify Hezbollah as a "terrorist organization." Hezbollah’s official media wing released a new map (above) of Lebanon that shows the areas where the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) have been searching for tunnels. According to the map, the Israeli Defense Forces have been searching the border areas in Kafr Kila, Mays Al-Jabal, Bleida, Ramieh, and ‘Alma Al-Sha’ab. The map below shows the Nabatieh Governorate of southern Lebanon where the Lebanese Army is now deploying troops: The primary focus of the IDF operation is taking place near the towns of Mays Al-Jabal and Kafr Kila; these aforementioned towns are the locations of the two destroyed tunnels. The Israeli Defense Forces are still searching the Lebanese border for Hezbollah tunnels; however, they have yet to find any in the last 48 hours. Meanwhile, Israel today reportedly gave Hezbollah a deadline for agreeing to stop manufacturing precision weapons which can reach into central Israel. It is not yet known what that deadline is, or why Israel thinks it can tell another country what weapons systems it is allowed to possess. Intelligence sources tell the Hal Turner Radio Show that Israel is still smarting from being defeated in its last war with Lebanon, and since Israel is presently unable to continue attacking Syria with impunity thanks to Syria's new S-300 missile system, the Israelis are now focusing on someone else to wage war with. Those sources BOTH say "expect war between Israel and Lebanon before Christmas."

[:: 2-11-07 am service (first word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: : :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc.. You shall see China as she continues to rise in her power. etc.

[ :: 12-13-09 am service (first word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. China continues to build up her monetary system, putting pressure on the whole world to come to a worldly monetary system etc..

:: 12-12-18 Cuenca High Life :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Ecuador News

In Beijing, Moreno pushes trade, loan refinancing and Ecuador’s participation in the ‘Silk Road’

Dec 12, 2018 | CuencaHighLife | Views: 1,381

In a series of meetings with Chinese government and corporate officials Tuesday, President Lenin Moreno promoted Ecuadorian products and investment opportunities. He also signaled Ecuador’s interest in being a part of China’s massive “Silk Road” infrastructure project in Latin America. Today, Moreno and his delegation meet with financial officials to discuss refinancing Ecuador’s multi-billion dollar debt to Chinese government agencies and banks. Prior to the visit, China said it was willing to provide Ecuador more favorable terms on outstanding loans. Later in the day, Moreno meets and dines with Chinese President Xi Jinping to discuss a number of topics, including Ecuador’s involvement in the Silk Road project. Called the largest infrastructure project in history, the Silk Road is a trillion-dollar Chinese investment program to build roads, rail lines, airports and hydro-electric projects with partner countries. Originally planned for Asia, Europe and Africa, Xi Jinping recently announced the project will have a Latin American component. Citing the “complimentary interests” of the two countries, Moreno acknowledged China’s dominant position in world affairs. “China has become the benchmark for innovation and development in the 21st century,” he said. “Ecuador has a great deal to offer as China extends its interests throughout the world and we are eager to cooperate in a range of mutually beneficial financial, infrastructure and social projects.” Moreno touted Ecuador’s location on the Pacific rim as an advantage for China, as well as the quality of its existing infrastructure. “The two countries have direct access to each other by sea routes and Ecuador offers investors an existing network of good highways and a reliable electric power grid,” he said. He cited a recent report in which Ecuador ranks second only to Chile for the best highways in Latin America. In Tuesday’s trade talks, the focus was on Ecuador’s major exports, such as seafood, bananas, rice and flowers, but also covered what Ecuador Foreign Trade Minister Pablo Campana called “emerging market products,” such as coffee, chocolate and hand-crafted goods. “It is important that Ecuador diversify beyond oil to develop trade in new markets,” he said. “This is a primary objective of our trade and investment discussions in China.” During the visit, Ecuador and China plan to sign a wide range of agreements on such issues as judicial cooperation, civil aviation, disaster risk management, agricultural and technical cooperation.

[:: 8-20-17 am service (second word)  ::  ::  ::  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::   ::  ::  ::  ::  ::]

From this day forth, says your Father, the true news, the true news is going to have to come from me, because even those stations that at one time were true are now turning and going the other direction because of the power, because of the money people, because of those that want the one world government etc

:: 12-12-18 Invex news :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Google Is the Enemy of Humanity and Needs to Resisted At All Costs

12-12-2018 < news The Common Sense Show

Dave Hodges The Common Sense Show

I recently wrote an article in which I asserted that the American citizenry consists of 3 groups: (1) Godless Liberals, who comprise 20% of the population, who are fanatically dedicated to the demise of the rule of law and the abandonment of any sense of nationalism and patriotism; (2) Conservatives, who make up 30% of the population, who are dedicated to the tenets of the Constitution and rule of law as well as the rejection of globalism; and, (3) The slugs who make up about 50% of the population and they are generally clueless about the world they live in and how close they are to losing everything. Oh, they will eventually riot like the French when their entertainment is interfered with, but they will not riot until it is too late to make any significant changes. There are many liberal influences that controls the minds and ultimately the perceptions of the majority of people in the United States. Over 98% of the mainstream media is controlled by 6 people, all liberals, who have expressed disdain for the average person. Yes, Fox appears to be conservative, but make no mistake about it, Fox is the controlled opposition. That leaves 2% of the media to tell the country the truth about what is REALLY happening to our freedoms, and ultimately our final fate under the intentions of globalist rule. At the forefront of the propaganda that keeps America paralyzed is Google. Google has moved passed Monsanto (ie Monsatan) as the most evil corporation in the world. Google is an active participant in Chinese genocide against their conservative social class with the installation of the Google-created Chinese Social Credit System that sends average citizens to prison and ultimately their demise for expressed populist opinions as detected by the Google technology. And that technology is being implemented in America as I write these words. The marriage between the repressive Chinese government and Google is a marriage made in hell. I have written countless articles where I accuse Google as being the enemy of democracy. Google is more powerful than nations. They are treating the world like any conquering army. They are erasing history, altering culture, stifling legitimate dissent, strangling economic competition, monopolizing the Internet, hacking elections and relentlessly spying on American citizens. When Google was questioned by Congress and their CEO was challenged by Alex Jones about their role in Chinese genocide, the Google CEO giggled! If you do not think that Google will laugh over the graves of conservative Americans and ultimately the grace of the clueless slugs, you are not paying attention. Google, without question, is the enemy of freedom and they are committing crimes against humanity that would have resulted in their arrest and execution at the Nuremburg trials held for Nazi war criminals and their actions in the concentration camps. Make no mistake about it, Google is the genocidal arm of the New World Order (ie the globalists). Google has gone beyond Orwell’s 1984. They are in the midst of creating a “Blue Pill” reality. Google is the matrix. Google has created the cage where the young people of America are growing up. It is the cage that people my generation resists because we were essentially born free. My generation respects our collective innate spirit of autonomy that the Lord blessed us with. However, our younger generation has been raised in the Google-created cage and they do not know true freedom and are unable to see the loss of free will that is a central part of our God-created spirit. Ultimately, if Google cannot permanently control the 50% of the population (ie slugs), they will indeed lose in their ability to totally enforce a police state surveillance grid with genocidal intentions. I want to be perfectly clear, without hyperbole, under Google’s growing control over the Internet and ultimately commerce, we are racing headlong towards the mark of the beast. Ask yourself a question: Do you see any freedom-respecting and Christian values coming from Google? Their marriage to the genocidal Communist Chinese regime speaks to their intentions for humanity. The fundamental and central concern for humanity hinges on mounting resistance against Google. The Art of War, written by Sun Tzu, talked about putting people on death’s ground if one needed maximum effort from the majority of an army needed to accomplish victory. Sun Tzu once said the following: “… Throw your soldiers into positions whence there is no escape, and they will prefer death to flight. If they will face death, there is nothing they may not achieve. Officers and men alike will put forth their uttermost strength…” The antithesis of resistance is rooted in the fallacy of Q-Anon and it is based upon getting America to relax and to prevent American society from being thrown on death’s ground. Tomorrow, there will be 55,000 indictments. Sorry, that date has been moved to January, but the indictments will grow to 65,000. Gitmo has added thousands of beds. Sometime next spring, the number of sealed indictments will grow to 75,000. Relax America, you are safe, resistance is futile, but justice will be done. The damn truth of the matter is that Trump has done nothing to drain the swamp and Q-Anon is an anesthetic designed to paralyze resistance to the growing tyranny. There has not been one indictment and not one conviction and there will never be. There are only 300 sealed indictments across the United States, yet we cling to the false promise that justice is coming. For those who believe in the tooth fairy, Santa, and the Easter Bunny, please show me one scintilla of proof…. please… one shred of proof….waiting…any time now….So, while you wait for what will never be, perhaps, for the sake of your children, you should take matters into your own hands The key to waking up the majority of the slugs is to put them and theirs on death’s ground. All conversations with the beer-drinking NFL- couch-potato-fanatics must begin and end with the discussion of the bottom line, the death and destruction of their children by the hand of the globalists. I speak everyday to slugs and I tell them that while they refer to my observations as “conspiracy theory”, their children are being set up for slaughter by the globalist bankers who are planning the next war that could wipe out the majority of humanity. Why do the globalists need the war, they need to destroy nations and reduce the size of the population so they can usher in a one-world economic and tyrannical governmental system whose dissident detection systems will be run by Google. Remember, it was the IBM punch cards that allowed the Germans to accurately process millions of death camp victims. Google, because of technological advances, will much more active than IBM in the demise of humanity. They have already shown their hand with regard to growing holocaust growing in China. To the slugs who think that they can hide behind their cognitive dissonance, please look at the future that the globalists have planned for your children. To the slugs, these are your children that will buried here in the next war to end all wars. They will end up here, because you failed to put down the remote and act. In this case, a picture is worth a thousand words and no other elaboration is necessary. It may surprise some to know that many of us in the Independent Media speak to each other about our hopes and fears for humanity. Unlike the so-called journalists in the MSM, we actually care about the outcome and are trying to save lives. Along these lines, I have had conservations with Steve Quayle and he feels that the long-term survival of America is not likely, but individual survival may be achieved. I agree with Steve. My hope, however, is to stave off the inevitable for as long as possible. What if we were able to achieve pushing back the globalists for a generation or longer? At least our children would have a fighting chance. Even if the inevitable happens, I would rather die on my feet than in some gas chamber designed for dissidents to the globalist inspired New World Order. As long as God gives me the strength to resist, I will. And to my final point, our best ally is God. However, faith without action is a folly. My actions are strongly directed at waking up the slugs. If you care about your children, you may wish to roll up your sleeves, after you pray to the Lord for guidance, and get to work. Cognitive dissonance is a powerful force to overcome. However, there is another psychological condition that we can use to our benefit, and it is called confirmation bias which states that the more one hears a message, the more likely they are to believe the message. This is why Google spends so much time censoring ideas of freedom and the rule of law. Google can shadow ban this article, but if you are reading this article, Google cannot shadow ban you sharing these observations with friends and family. Look at the previous photo, do you see your children buried at Arlington? And for goodness sake, do not use Google as a search engine. At the heart of all the misery expressed in this article, if you have any doubt that Google is at the center of all this tyranny, you need to reread the article and then share it with family and friends.

http://www.invexnews.com/item-401629-google-is-the-enemy-of-humanity-and-need 

:: 12-11-18 Infowars :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Google CEO Lies Under Oath About Internet Censorship

Denies bias, secretive data collection, and algorithm manipulation

Infowars.com - December 11, 2018

Google’s “CEO”, Sundar Pichai, has officially lied to congress under oath as he continues to push the false narrative that Google does not have bias towards conservatives. Alex Jones joins Owen Shroyer via Skype to expose the lies of big tech and the deep state search engine.

https://www.infowars.com/google-ceo-lies-under-oath-about-internet-censorship/ 

:: 12-11-18 Infowars :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Google CEO Sundar Pichai Runs From Alex Jones & Roger Stone at Congressional Hearing

Police threaten Jones with arrest during confrontation

Paul Joseph Watson | Infowars.com - December 11, 2018

Google CEO Sundar Pichai fled from Alex Jones and Roger Stone before a Congressional hearing during which Pichai will be grilled about censorship of conservative voices. Pichai appeared agitated as Jones repeatedly chanted “Google is evil”. A police officer then warned Jones to be quiet or he would be arrested. “They’re going to talk about me in this committee, I will be talked about – so what am I supposed to do?” Jones asked reporters. “I don’t get a day in court, they lie about me….all the top searches are lies about me and my family,” said Jones, accusing Google of helping Communist China’s government target dissidents. “His people come lie to Congress over and over and over again and we don’t get to respond to them,” he added. The tech giant has denied that it is censoring conservative voices on its platforms, despite Google-owned YouTube banning both Jones and Gavin McInnes this year. Check out the live stream below for continuing coverage. Paul Joseph Watson is the editor at large of Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com.

:: 12-12-18 Strange Sounds :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

4.4 magnitude earthquake Tennessee: Strongest earthquake since 1973 hits near Decatur right across the river from Watts Bar Nuclear Plant and is felt in Atlanta Metro

By Strange Sounds - Dec 12, 2018

An early morning earthquake in east Tennessee Wednesday was widely felt over the Southeast U.S. The magnitude 4.4 quake struck around 4:14 a.m. EST, centered about 7 miles north-northeast of Decatur, Tennessee, in Meigs County, about 55 miles west-southwest of Knoxville. And right across the river from Watts Bar Nuclear Plant It was followed about 12 minutes later by a magnitude 3.3 aftershock. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, light shaking was observed over most of the Atlanta metro area, and a number of states from southern Alabama to South Carolina, North Carolina, and Kentucky. More than 5700 people reported feeling the earthquake on the USGS homepage summary. There were however no immediate reports of damage or injuries. This quake was one of the strongest on record in east Tennessee, exceeded only by a November 30, 1973 near Maryville, south of Knoxville which lead to minor damage near the epicenter. The quake appeared to occur along the Eastern Tennessee Seismic Zone, a southwest-to-northeast belt extending from Alabama to far southwest Virginia that is the second-most active quake zone in the central and eastern U.S. behind the more notorious New Madrid zone. A 2014 USGS study bumped a portion of the ETSZ to a higher risk of earthquakes, though not nearly as high as the New Madrid zone in the western part of Tennessee and other adjacent states. Though quakes stronger than M4.7 have not been recorded in recent times, a 2017 study in the Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America found evidence of a M6 or stronger temblor along the ETSZ within the last 25,000 years. Earthquakes in the central and eastern U.S. can be felt over an area more than 10 times larger than a similar magnitude quake in the West, according to the USGS. [USGS, USGS1, Weather]

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-46317225 

https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/alternative/2018/3651761.html 

:: 12-11-18 Gatestone Institute :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

European Court of Human Rights Blasphemy Laws: Where a Word out of Place Can Cost Your Life

by Denis MacEoin December 11, 2018 at 5:00 am

The European Court of Human Rights ruled that criticism of Muhammad constitutes incitement to hatred -- meaning that in Europe, criticizing Muhammad is no longer protected free speech. What the court has actually done, however, is rule out the possibility of any debate in which a range of various experts and members of the public could take part. Now, it seems, the only views that will be respected in the public forum are those of devout Muslims. Underage marriages are considered by some countries child abuse or statutory rape, but are acceptable under shari'a law; they also take place in Muslim communities in Western countries such as the UK. This alone is a major reason why platforms must be found to debate the issue instead of sweeping it, as something offensive, under the carpet. Ignoring it is offensive. Moreover, as some Muslims are often offended by even small matters regarding their faith, such as a toy teddy bear named Mohammad or a prisoner on death row declared innocent -- so that mobs take to the streets to condemn, or even kill, those individuals -- what now will not be censored in the West? There are, of course, social settings where it pays to watch your words. Saying you fancy the looks of a mafioso's new girlfriend could well prove fatal. Spending time with a bunch of Hamas terrorists while expressing your love for Israel might not lead to your premature demise. In London today, young men who make remarks or play music to other youths on the street can wind up stabbed to death. A recent comment on The Independent website claims, "In this country [the UK], some views, regardless of how valid and logical, can result in anything from public rebuke to loss of a job to violence." For the most part, we learn how to avoid words or actions that may offend someone or some group, especially if it is known to be prone to violence. Yet these misfortunes are rare and we live our lives on the assumption that in democratic countries, we can speak freely within the norms of civil society. We recognize that in many countries, racist, homophobic, antisemitic, or "Islamophobic" hate speech can be reported to the police and lead to the arrest and eventual trial of the speaker. The United States' First Amendment to its Constitution protects its citizens from prosecution for free speech, except where there is a credible threat of "Imminent lawless action." If angry exchanges take place, they are just a consequence of living in countries where free speech and unfettered opinion are cherished. We have seen what happens in countries where there is no free speech –as the Soviet Union or present day Pakistan (here, here and here); it often is not pretty and in much of the West is regarded as well worth the trade-off. Particular sensitivities surround religious ideas, and histories. Nowhere is this more apparent today than in the instance of Islam, where anything untoward, especially statements that even a few people may consider blasphemous -- such as young schoolchildren naming a toy teddy bear Mohammad, a common enough name in the Sudan -- might be treated as criminal offences. In the West, within secular democratic states, most churches mercifully appear no longer interested in controlling matters such as blasphemy. When I lived in the Irish Republic in the 1960s and early 1970s, the Catholic Church held a tight grip on society. Books were banned, including by James Joyce, D.H. Lawrence and all of Sigmund Freud. Films and plays were also banned or censored. The intolerant ban on Catholics studying at Trinity College Dublin perpetuated injustice. Since the 1960s, however, we now have same-sex marriage, women's right to abortion, and an openly gay Taoiseach (Prime Minister). This year, on October 6, a majority of the Irish voted in a referendum to abolish the blasphemy law that had been in its constitution since 1937. The country has liberalized remarkably. Ironically, while Ireland's 2010 blasphemy law was still technically on the books (although never actually implemented ), the 57-state Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) – consisting of 56 mostly Muslim states plus "Palestine" -- cited it in 2009 during an attempt to impose an international blasphemy law on the UN. Also in 2009, the government had passed a new Irish Defamation Act that contained a full definition of the blasphemy law (the one abolished this year). This vote took place during a committee meeting for the 13th session of the UN Human Rights Council. The proposal, made on behalf of the OIC by Pakistan, used the Irish definition:

38.1 States parties shall prohibit by law the uttering of matters that are grossly abusive or insulting in relation to matters held sacred by any religion thereby causing outrage among a substantial number of the adherents to that religion. We do not know if the principal motivation for the OIC came less from a concern about religions that Muslims might consider entirely false, abrogated and inferior, such as Judaism or Christianity, or more from a concern that no one should be allowed to criticize Islam. In any event, Ireland finally woke up to the injustice of its blasphemy law, and the damage it was doing to its growing reputation as a country purporting to observe human rights. Figures for blasphemy laws worldwide were recently cited by the Pew Research Center in its 2016 report on "Trends in Global Restrictions on Religion": We found that laws restricting apostasy and blasphemy are most common in the Middle East and North Africa, where 18 of the region's 20 countries (90%) criminalize blasphemy and 14 (70%) criminalize apostasy. While apostasy laws exist in only two other regions of the world – Asia-Pacific and sub-Saharan Africa – blasphemy laws can be found in all regions, including Europe (in 16% of countries) and the Americas (29%). Possibly a better way of expressing concerns about blasphemy laws is to list the 30 Islamic countries that have such regulations, 13 of them imposing the death penalty for the offence. Here they are, in alphabetical order. Some offer life imprisonment. The ones in bold print carry death sentences: Afghanistan Algeria Bahrain Brunei Egypt Indonesia

Iran Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Libya Mauritania Malaysia Maldives Morocco Nigeria Oman

Pakistan Palestinian territories Qatar Saudi Arabia Senegal Somalia Sudan Tunisia Turkey United Arab Emirates (UAE) Western Sahara Yemen With this disturbing list in mind, let us consider at least one dangerous development in Europe. More than one Western country is bringing forth legislation that will allow Islamic blasphemy laws in through the back door. In 2017, Canada passed Motion M-103, regarded as a shari'a blasphemy law forbidding free speech about Islam. Although at this stage it is "non-binding, one of its supporters, Samer Majzoub, president of the Canadian Muslim Forum and affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, wrote, "Now that Islamophobia has been condemned, this is not the end, but rather the beginning." The most recent and glaring of these initiatives involves not a country, but the supranational, unaccountable European Court of Human Rights, a body that issues rulings enforceable in all 57 countries of the OIC that are signatories to the European Convention on Human Rights. Forty-seven of the signatory states are members of the Council of Europe, which is different from the 28-state European Union (although all EU states also belong within the Council). There are, as well, other bodies to be taken into consideration – ones that open up another Pandora's Box. Even though the primary focus of the Council of Europe is the wide network of its member states, it also has close links to, and shares activities with, a large range of international institutions. Through a variety of conventions and treaties, it helps set legal standards for those states, both members and non-members. Those non-member states include many familiar Western countries such as the USA, Canada, Israel, and Australia among others. These are states in which the values in areas such as human rights are closely aligned to those of the European member states. Many of the Council's conventions concern human rights, the protection of democracy, and the prevention of racial and other forms of intolerance. The Council of Europe also engages with a variety of Muslim states, many of which are included on the list above of countries that enact laws on blasphemy. At a minimum, these include Algeria, Lebanon, Malaysia, Mauritania, Morocco, Senegal, and Tunisia. The Council also has several other conventions on human rights, including

The European Convention on Human Rights

The European Committee for the Prevention of Torture

The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance

The Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings

The Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse (The Lanzarote Convention)

The Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence These and other positions of the COE clearly align with, and develop, the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and are solidly founded within modern Western democratic values. The Council has set out its human rights principles in its Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Article 9 of that Convention deals with "Freedom of Thought, conscience and religion"

"1. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance.

"2. Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs shall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others."

The following article (10) deals with Freedom of Expression. It begins: "Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers." However, its second part does permit restrictions: "in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the reputation or rights of others." Of relevance to some of the Islamic states referred to above, Protocol 6 of the Convention deals with the abolition of the death penalty. The Protocol in Article 1 states that: "The death penalty shall be abolished. No one shall be condemned to such penalty or executed." With these background facts, it is important to look at what happened on October 25 this year when the European Court of Human Rights issued its verdict on a case involving an Austrian woman, called Mrs. S., presumably Elisabeth Sabadtisch-Wolff, and an appeal she had made to the court to protect her right to free speech over a sensitive but factually correct issue concerning the Prophet Muhammad. There is no room here for a full account of the woman in question, but readers may consult the details by the Soeren Kern here and here. What it amounts to is that Mrs. Sabaditsch-Wolff had given seminars about Islam in which she had drawn attention to the well-attested fact that Muhammad had married one of his eleven official wives, A'isha, when she was six, and consummated the marriage when she was nine. He apparently continued to have sexual relations with her until his death in 632, when she would have been eighteen. Sabaditsch-Wolff was reported to the authorities for claiming that Muhammad "liked to do it with children. A 56-year-old and a 6-year-old? . . . What do we call it, if it is not pedophilia?". She was arrested and tried in 2009 through 2011, sentenced for "denigration of religious beliefs of a legally recognized religion", fined €480 ($625) and threatened with three months in prison. She appealed to Vienna's Provincial Appellate Court, which turned her down. Finally, she took her appeal to the European Court of Human Rights. That court, which reported on October 25, 2018, ruled that criticism of Muhammad constitutes incitement to hatred -- meaning that in Europe, criticizing Muhammad is no longer protected free speech. In their judgement, the judges wrote that defamation of Muhammad "goes beyond the permissible limits of an objective debate" and "could stir up prejudice and put at risk religious peace." The judgement will have an ongoing negative impact not only on Sabaditsch-Wolff, who will carry a criminal record for the rest of her life, with the resulting serious effects on her career and other matters, but all of the West, as well. It has certainly banned her and others from exercising their right to free speech asserted in the Convention of the Council of Europe. Now, it could well be argued, as the ECHR did, that Sabaditsch-Wolff expressed her concerns about Muhammad's sexuality without due attention to the historical and cultural context within which his marriage to A'isha took place. The ECHR did indeed argue this. The ECHR cited the Judgement of the Austrian courts: "The national courts found that Mrs S. had subjectively labelled Muhammad with pedophilia as his general sexual preference, and that she failed to neutrally inform her audience of the historical background, which consequently did not allow for a serious debate on that issue." What the court has actually done, however, is rule out the possibility of any debate in which a range of various experts and members of the public could take part, to exchange views on a clearly controversial and unresolved subject. Now, it seems, the only views that will be respected in the public forum are those of devout Muslims. The ECHR ruling also, unfortunately, will have an even wider impact across Europe and the world. The present writer, unlike Sabaditsch-Wolff, has a doctorate in Islamic studies and languages. If I were to refer to the original Arabic texts of the sacred traditions (ahadith) in which the story of Muhammad's marriage and sexual relations with A'isha -- texts officially held to be factually correct by all Sunni Muslims -- might I too now be put on trial for the same offence? Or if I were to write an article giving details of the approximately 40 individuals who were assassinated for having insulted the prophet on Muhammad's direct orders or whose assassinations were approved by him? What if, in the article, I also added comments on what this might indicate, backed up by chapter and verse of the Muslim histories and sacred traditions that record them, should I then be brought before a court, sentenced, fined or sent to prison? Will no academic or well-informed individual in future be able to say anything about Muhammad, or will that now be legally prohibited? Moreover, as some Muslims are often offended by even small matters regarding their faith, such as a toy teddy bear named Mohammad or a prisoner on death row declared innocent -- so that mobs take to the streets to condemn, or even kill, those individuals -- what now will not be censored in the West? It may well be suggested that Muhammad's sexual preferences are matters of purely historical interest, but in many Muslim countries, the proper age for marriage is determined, not according to the standards of the ECHR or other international bodies, but on the strength of the firmly established sacred traditions that help form the basis, alongside the Qur'an and the ahadith, of Shari'a law. In many countries, child brides are still commonplace, often in marriages that are forced – as, for instance here, here, here and here. In some Muslim countries, such as Yemen, marriages at early ages are not uncommon and may be justified by reference to Muhammad's sexual relations with A'isha at the ages of 9. Underage marriages, considered by some countries child abuse or statutory rape, but acceptable under shari'a law, also take place in Muslim communities in Western countries such as the UK. This alone is a major reason why platforms must be found to debate the issue instead of sweeping it, as something offensive, under the carpet. Ignoring it is offensive. As noted earlier, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation has been trying for years to persuade the UN Human Rights Council to adopt a general blasphemy law that will block anything deemed by someone as critical of one faith alone-- namely Islam. A few weeks ago, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan informed the UN of an initiative for an international campaign to criminalize criticism of Islam. This year, a significant and influential Western human rights court has shown the future potentially in store for us. It is not hard to imagine that the OIC is already making plans to employ the ECHR as its agency of choice for officially introducing the law it has coveted for so long: "Defamation of religion," meaning just one faith, Islam. There do not seem any plans afoot to stop criticizing Christians or Jews, or Christianity or Judaism. If the ECHR builds a foundation for universal censorship, how long will it be before the UN Human Rights Council, pressured by its Islamic state members, will fall in line? I already wrote about this possible threat to all of us: The chief threat to free speech today comes from a combination of radical Islamic censorship and Western political correctness... [W]e are free to call to account any religion from Christianity to Scientology, Judaism to any cult we choose.... It used to be possible to do this with Islam as well.... But many Muslim bodies -- notably the 57-member-state Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) -- have been working hard for years to render Islam the only religion, political system and ideology in the world that may not be questioned with impunity. They have tried -- and are in many respects succeeding -- to ring-fence Islam as a creed beyond criticism, while reserving for themselves the right to condemn Christians, Jews, Hindus, democrats, liberals, women, gays, or anyone else in often vile, even violent language. Should anyone say anything that seems to them disrespectful of their faith, he or she will at once be declared an "Islamophobe". Barely two and a half years later, that may soon come to pass. We need to take swift collective action to fight this death to free speech that such initiatives pose to freedoms that we revere in the West and to which so many millions elsewhere aspire.

Denis MacEoin PhD is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at New York's Gatestone Institute.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13377/european-court-human-rights-blasphemy-laws 

:: 12-11-18 Conspiracy Daily Update :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

dutchsinse

12/11/2018 — Major Earthquake activity — M7.1 in South Atlantic + MAGMA HOT SPOTS in OR, CA, WA

Dec 11, 2018 Brian Hyland

Earthquakes can systematically trigger other ones on opposite side of Earth (antipodes)

https://ift.tt/2veFB0w 

______

Professionals now adopting “GLOBAL EARTHQUAKE FORECASTING MODELS” which have been proved correct: https://ift.tt/2JkaY28 

______

*disclaimer* The comments seen on the 24/7 earthquake live stream are not endorsed by, nor do they reflect the views of the creator of this youtube channel. All comments are assumed to be the responsibility of the end user who caused the generation of text, emojis, or symbols of any kind in chat ( or by whatever means the characters presented are generated).

Watch all updates, backups and copies here on coppertropicals channel : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjq4pjKj9X4W9i7UnYShpVg 

______

Southern California Slow Slip article + Studies : https://ift.tt/2y71ihQ 

Monitor Slow Slip tremors in the Pacific Northwest: https://ift.tt/2pha5fs 

Search Antipodes (opposite sides of the planet) here: https://ift.tt/2eUbYtS 

Download the full (paid) version of earthquake3D here : https://ift.tt/2bGGVxF 

Free version here: https://ift.tt/10bvfwl 

Earthquake3D interactive live feed : https://ift.tt/2a5vkJR 

We (dutchsinse and viewers) are not associated with Earthquake3D’s creation, maintenance, or development. We receive no compensation for recommending this application, and have no relation with (or to) the programs developer(s). If you would like the full paid version, please purchase a copy directly from the program creators website which is linked above, so they receive full compensation for the hard work they put in creating this wonderful seismic monitoring program!

_____

Earthquake Resources: Check tsunami warnings issued by the US agencies here: http://tsunami.gov/ 

Pacific Tsunami Warning Center: https://ift.tt/HtUWta 

Alaska Tsunami Warning Center: https://ift.tt/UvAfEo 

National Data Buoy Center (NDBC) buoy monitoring: https://ift.tt/Y8hcRG 

Deep-ocean Assessment Reporting Tsunamis (DART) buoys: https://ift.tt/1NyuSRc 

______

Global Earthquake Monitoring Links (multiple agencies worldwide): https://ift.tt/1UNqO4h 

USGS main earthquake reporting site: https://ift.tt/2jdaOgl 

European / EMSC main earthquake reporting site: https://ift.tt/2CQzGkb 

New Zealand Earthquakes: https://ift.tt/PsJxSP 

Japan Earthquakes: https://ift.tt/w6iMrD 

Live streaming Japan earthquakes: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyMW-_pfjsTG76c9tP5SErg 

_______

Volcanic Ash Advisory Center (VAAC): https://ift.tt/2HurQ2n 

______

The non-earthquake related graphics, images, background, content , video, voice content captured on this property , and which are on this stream are NOT intended for redistribution, copying, or repeating unless otherwise approved by the content creator, Michael Janitch aka Dutchsinse on youtube.

________

Marker height off the globe represents depth into the Earth.

When an earthquake strikes, you will hear a rumble, ding, and a bell toll. The bell will toll the number of times = to the earthquake which occurs. (example : M4.0 will ring 4 times).

The most recent earthquake has a green placemark / flag on it.

Blue flag / placemark = the last earthquake which was looked up

*Disclaimer* Before sharing the information contained in this video, please consult local, and national laws in your country to verify if you are allowed to share earthquake warnings from private individuals

View on YouTube

Last Thursday, the Aviationist tweeted a photo of a mysterious combat aircraft which resembled a fifth-generation Chinese fighter jet, claiming the photo was taken at the Savannah/Hilton Head International Airport, a commercial and military-use airport in Savannah, Georgia, on Wednesday, December 05. For several days, wild theories circulated social media channels, of why a Chinese stealth jet was parked on the tarmac of a Georgian military base.  It turns out the aircraft is real, but only a mock-up for use by the US Marine Corps (USMC), “It is a full-scale replica and remained at the Air Dominance Center for a short period during the week of 4-6 Dec. The USMC is funding and directing the training objectives of this device […] Col. Emmanuel Haldopoulos, Commander of the Savannah Air Dominance Center, wrote the Aviationist in an email. Haldopoulos did not specify the role of the mock-up stealth jet, but there is a reason to believe that the US military is preparing its pilots for an aerial battle over the South China Sea. The photo caused huge speculation when the Aviationist published the story last Thursday. A civilian spotter who asked to remain anonymous shot the photo from public property. Social media pundits viewed the photo and offered wide-ranging theories on what the aircraft was doing on an American military base. Many incorrectly questioned if the picture was authentic, some suggested the photo may have been altered or Photoshopped. Before the Air Force confirmed the USMC-owned J-20 mock-up, Chinese Defense subject matter expert, Andreas Rupprecht, said the plane's exhaust nozzles looked inaccurate and the landing gear was different from a real J-20 stealth fighter jet. These observations confirmed the aircraft was a mock-up and not a real J-20. The J-20 mock-up hints that the US is preparing its pilots of F-22 Raptors and F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters for possible future dogfights with China. The Chinese stealth fighter showed off its missile bays last month at an airshow in southern China. The J-20's chief designer recently said the world has yet to see the best that the aircraft has to offer. The J-20 mock-up shows the American military is taking the Chinese threat seriously, as the Pentagon prepares for war.

etc. Keep your eyes; keep your eyes upon what is going on in the Mid-East, that is your tree, that is your tree, I have told you to watch Israel, that is your tree. etc.

[ :: 10-17-10 am service  (first word)  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

[ :: 7-15-15 pm service :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. For I have warned you Russia is not your friend, I have warned you that China is not your friend, I have warned you that North Korea is not your friend and I have warned you that Iran is not your friend. etc.

[ :: 8-9-17 pm service (first word)  ::  ::  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::  ::]

etc.  If you look at Russia she is ready to strike, Iran ready to strike, North Korea ready to strike, they are not playing games; they are serious with the things that they are saying.  Only you have felt that they have feared you, and because you have felt that they have feared you, you are not listening as close as you should. etc.  

:: 12--18 Reuters :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Iran confirms missile test in defiance of U.S.

Babak Dehghanpisheh

GENEVA (Reuters) - A senior Iranian military commander has confirmed that Tehran recently carried out a ballistic missile test, to the anger of the United States, the Fars news agency said on Tuesday. The Revolutionary Guards official’s comment came after U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s assertion earlier this month that Iran had test-fired a missile capable of carrying multiple warheads and reaching the Middle East and Europe. “We will continue our missile tests and this recent action was an important test,” Guards aerospace division head Amirali Hajizadeh was quoted as saying by the semi-official Fars news agency. “The reaction of the Americans shows that this test was very important for them and that’s why they were shouting,” he added, without specifying what type of missile had been tested. The U.N. Security Council met last week to discuss the test, which the United States, Britain and France said flouted U.N. restrictions on Tehran’s military program. U.S. President Donald Trump pulled out of an international agreement on Iran’s nuclear program in May and reimposed sanctions on Tehran. He said the deal was flawed because it did not include curbs on Iran’s development of ballistic missiles or its support for proxies in Syria, Yemen, Lebanon and Iraq. Iran has ruled out negotiations with Washington over its military capabilities, particularly the missile program run by the Guards. It says the program is purely defensive and denies missiles are capable of being tipped with nuclear warheads. Hajizadeh said Iran holds up to 50 missile tests a year. “The issue of missiles has never been subject to negotiations and nothing has been approved or ratified about its prohibition for the Islamic Republic of Iran in (U.N.) resolution 2231,” Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said on Tuesday, according to the Tasnim news agency. “Our defense doctrine is basically founded upon deterrence.” Under U.N. Security Council Resolution 2231, which enshrined the nuclear deal in 2015, Iran is “called upon” to refrain from work on ballistic missiles designed to deliver nuclear weapons for up to eight years. Some states argue the language does not make it obligatory. Last month, Hajizadeh said U.S. bases in Afghanistan, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, and U.S. aircraft carriers in the Gulf were within range of Iranian missiles. The head of the Guards, Major General Mohammad Ali Jafari, said on Tuesday the United States was becoming weaker. “American power is declining,” Jafari said, according to Fars. “The enemies don’t dare bring up the issue of overthrowing the Islamic Republic and they will take this wish to the grave.” In October, the Revolutionary Guards fired missiles at Islamic State militants in Syria after the Islamist group said it was responsible for an attack at a military parade in Iran that killed 25 people, nearly half of them Guards members. Reporting by Babak Dehghanpisheh; Editing by Richard Balmforth and Andrew Cawthorne

[ :: 7-15-15 pm service :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. For I have warned you Russia is not your friend, I have warned you that China is not your friend, I have warned you that North Korea is not your friend and I have warned you that Iran is not your friend. etc.

[ :: 2-2-16 pm service :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. the whole world can tell you right now that Russia and North Korea has declared war on the United States of America.  The whole country can tell you an invasion is coming, the whole country can tell you the cashless monetary system is ready to start, the banks will have no money, the mark of the beast will be here.  But I am trying to protect you by placing one that can protect you, but even if that is not so and cannot be, I will still protect you and take you through this time safely. etc

[ :: 1-7-18 am service  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

Keep a very careful spiritual eye on Russia, that is right, I didn’t say North Korea, I said Russia, Russia.  Listen to the news and you will notice how she is building and building and testing and testing.  Soon she will strike.

[ :: 1-17-18 pm service  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::]

For as I have said unto you and as you have noticed the weather, the weather, the weather, the troubles that are going on here, the troubles that are going on there, the preparation for war, not just North Korea but Russia and other countries that hate America, they are preparing and getting ready.  For the hour is much later than most people think, etc

:: 12-12-18 al jazeera :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Russia scoffs at US criticism of bomber deployment to Venezuela

Massive Tu-160 bomber is capable of carrying conventional or nuclear-tipped cruise missiles with a range of 5,550km.

23 hours ago

Moscow has rejected US criticism of the deployment to Venezuela of two Russian nuclear-capable strategic bombers. US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo responded to Monday's arrival of a pair of Tu-160 aircraft in Venezuela by tweeting: "The Russian and Venezuelan people should see this for what it is: two corrupt governments squandering public funds and squelching liberty and freedom while their people suffer." Russian President Vladimir Putin's spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, dismissed Pompeo's comments as "undiplomatic" and "inappropriate". He told reporters on Tuesday such criticism sounds odd from a country "half of whose military budget would be enough to feed the whole of Africa". The bombers' deployment comes amid soaring Russia-US tensions. Russian-US ties have sunk to post-Cold War lows over Ukraine, the war in Syria, and allegations of Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election. Blackjack US gives Russia 60 days to comply with nuclear treaty (2:02) Russia's defence ministry said a pair of Tu-160 bombers landed on Monday at Maiquetia airport outside Caracas following a 10,000-km flight. It didn't say if the bombers were carrying any weapons and didn't say how long they will stay in Venezuela. The ministry said the bombers were shadowed by Norwegian F-18 fighter jets during part of their flight. The Tu-160 is capable of carrying conventional or nuclear-tipped cruise missiles with a range of 5,500km. Code-named Blackjack by NATO, the massive warplane is capable of flying at twice the speed of sound. Russia has upgraded its Tu-160 fleet with new weapons and electronics and it plans to produce a modernised version of the bomber. Economic aid The deployment follows Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro's visit to Moscow last week, in a bid to shore up political and economic assistance, as his country struggles to pay billions of dollars owed to Russia. Russia is a major political ally of Venezuela, which has become increasingly isolated internationally under growing sanctions led by the United States and the European Union, which accuse Maduro of undermining democratic institutions to hold on to power while overseeing an economic and political crisis that is worse than the Great Depression. Russian Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu said at last week's meeting with his Venezuelan counterpart, Vladimir Padrino Lopez, that Russia would continue to send its military aircraft and warships to visit Venezuela as part of bilateral military cooperation. Asked about the Russian bombers, Colonel Rob Manning, a Pentagon spokesman, said he had no specific information. However, Manning cited the humanitarian assistance provided in Central and South America by a US Navy hospital ship, the USNS Comfort, over the past eight weeks. Numerous Venezuelan migrants were among the people who received medical and dental treatment. "Contrast this with Russia, whose approach to the manmade disaster in Venezuela is to send bomber aircraft instead of humanitarian assistance," Manning said.

:: 12--18 Breitbart :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

House Democrats Plan Push to Criminalize Private Gun Sales

House Democrats plan to introduce legislation criminalizing private gun sales once the new Congress is in session. Mother Jones reports that Rep. Mike Thompson (D-CA) met with gun control groups that included the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, Everytown for Gun Safety, the Center for American Progress, the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, and Gabby Giffords’ group. He asked them what they wanted, and a bill to criminalize private gun sales was on their wish list. So Thompson will sponsor legislation requiring a background check before someone may buy a gun from his neighbor, a co-worker to get a background check before buying a gun from a co-worker, and so forth. The bill will go so far as to require a son to get a background check before a father can give him a gun as a gift. Private gun sales are legal and have been an American tradition since 1791, the year the Second Amendment was ratified. Ironically, a ban on private sales would not have stopped a single mass shooting witnessed to this point in the 21st century because nearly every mass shooter acquires his guns at retail via a background check. The exceptions to the rule are the mass shooters who steal their guns. While the Democrats’ gun control push will not prevent mass shootings, it will criminalize a grandfather for passing his goose gun to his grandson without government permission. It will also criminalize a mother who gives her college-age daughter a revolver for self-defense without first getting government permission. AWR Hawkins is an award-winning Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News, the host of the Breitbart podcast Bullets with AWR Hawkins, and the writer/curator of Down Range with AWR Hawkins, a weekly newsletter focused on all things Second Amendment, also for Breitbart News. He is the political analyst for Armed American Radio. Follow him on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com. Sign up to get Down Range at breitbart.com/downrange.

:: 12-6-18 Justus Knight :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

They Just Joined The Mandatory Vaccination Attack On Our Children! You Can’t Say No If They Win: Even If It Goes Against Your Religion!

December 6, 2018 Justus A Knight

References Can Be Found At www.justusaknight.com  (please subscribe while you’re there!!) Another state has joined the attack on our children. They want you to have no say in this AT ALL. They don’t even care if it goes against your religion or philosophical beliefs! This legislation would assure that every child has no choice but to accept. The facts have proven they are dangerous, ineffective and damaging in ways we have yet to quantify entirely. If they continue to win this battle there will be no protecting our children from something so many of us STRONGLY disagree with. Watch to learn more! God Speed and God Bless, Justus

[ :: 11-13-16 am service  ::  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :::: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

As you can clearly see the evil in the world is almost fifty-fifty, my word has shown you that before, so that should not be a surprise.  For I have said that two shall be standing in the field and one shall go and one shall remain, that is fifty-fifty, and it has got to that place, that also means that the end is very, very near.  So you will still have half of the world that desires to do evil and half of the world that desires to do good, but only about thirty percent are true Christians. etc.

:: 12--18 Sputnik :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

READ MORE: Outrage as Swedish TV Portrays Suspected Gang Rapists as 'Victims'

https://sputniknews.com/europe/201812061070432569-finland-migrant-grooming-gangs/ 

:: 12-5-18 The Viligant Citizen :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Satanic Sculpture Installed at the Illinois Statehouse

A sculpture submitted by the Satanic Temple is on display at the Illinois Statehouse alongside a Christmas tree and a Nativity scene.

Published 6 days ago on December 5, 2018 By Vigilant Citizen

:: 12--18 Steve Quayle :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

GOD'S POSITION ON FIGHTING EVIL AND DEFENDING YOUR FAMILIES-NEH-4:14-'Be not ye afraid of them: remember the Lord, which is great and terrible, and fight for your brethren, your sons, and your daughters, your wives, and your houses'.

Nehemiah 4:12-15 King James Version (KJV)

12 And it came to pass, that when the Jews which dwelt by them came, they said unto us ten times, From all places whence ye shall return unto us they will be upon you.

13 Therefore set I in the lower places behind the wall, and on the higher places, I even set the people after their families with their swords, their spears, and their bows.

14 And I looked, and rose up, and said unto the nobles, and to the rulers, and to the rest of the people, Be not ye afraid of them: remember the Lord, which is great and terrible, and fight for your brethren, your sons, and your daughters, your wives, and your houses.

15 And it came to pass, when our enemies heard that it was known unto us, and God had brought their counsel to nought, that we returned all of us to the wall, every one unto his work.

King James Version (KJV)

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=NEHEMIAH+4%3A12-15&version=KJV 

:: 12-5-18 Strange Sounds :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

New normal? Severe hailstorms cover desert in white in Saudi Arabia, kill cows in South Africa and destroy crops in Australia

By Strange Sounds Dec 5, 2018

Weather is going crazy. Epic hailstorms cover the desert in Saudi Arabia in white, some insane ice rocks falling from the sky killed livestock in South Afica and crops were devastated by 3cm hailstones in Australia’s Wheatbelt. As if the desert was only dusty and dry! Heavy rain and hail hit Saudi Arabia’s northern province of al-Jawf on December 4. Teaching was suspended in some schools due to the extreme weather in the city of Sakakah. Meanwhile, a massive storm swept through and devastated Mhlambanyatsi, Lundzi, Siphocosini, and some parts of Mbabane in South AFrica on Tuesday, December 4, 2018, leaving at least 18 cows dead. Hail and severe weather also impacted crops the central Wheatbelt, Australia on Monday afternoon, with some farmers reporting huge losses. The wild weather event dumped more than 40mm of rain, while crops were pelted with 3cm hailstones and lightning strikes caused spot fires.

hailstorm tammin australia crops, hailstorm wheatbelt australia crops

^{:: 10-3-12 pm service (first word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]}

:: 12-5-18 Geller Report :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

STABBED TO DEATH: Paris College Lecturer THROAT SLIT by jihadi student

By Pamela Geller - on December 5, 2018

The so-far-unnamed suspected killer is a Pakistani national. The Democrats are fighting to bring this here. Get ready for an avalanche of “islamophobia” stories, “fear of reprisals” (which never happen), lots of psychobabble, and then for the pièce de résistance, “mental illness.”

in fatal attack by expelled student who failed to pass his exams’

Irish lecturer John Dowling was on the verge of retiring when he was stabbed to death

By Peter Allen, The Sun, 5th December 2018, 7:44 pm

AN Irish lecturer teaching English in Paris was today savagely stabbed to death by a former student who had failed to pass his exams. The horrific murder of John Dowling, 66, in a possible act of revenge took place outside the Leonardo De Vinci private university in the the western La Defense business district. “The victim was stabbed repeatedly after heading out of the college to go for lunch,” said an investigating source. “At least one of the cuts was to his throat, and he died on the scene. A 37-year-old man was arrested at the scene and remains in custody.” The so far unnamed suspected killer is a Pakistani national who was expelled from the university in the summer of 2017 after failing to get through the academic year. He is known to have remained in the area over the past year, and was in touch with those running the college.

https://gellerreport.com/2018/12/prof-throat-slit-jihadi.html/ 

:: 12-6-18 State of the Nation :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Our friends in the Czech Republic are more on top of the geoengineered California firestorms than most Americans

Posted on December 6, 2018 by State of the Nation

Fires in California were geoengineered.

OrgoNet (A website administered from the Czech Republic)

by SepsalOrgonet geoengineer

Anomaly of fires. Selectivity of fires. The houses that allegedly caught from the forest fires burned to the fallen, but the forests stand. Controlled Weapons – DEW. Smart Meters Smart Energy Meters. How can climatologists fire the house and not its surroundings? Mainstream media, not only in the US, but around the world, is trying to keep the impression that California is a natural forest fire, and that its extraordinary strength and scope are apparently caused, like other world “natural” last-ditch disasters, by the changes in the planet’s climate . Of course it’s a lie like CO2-drive global warming is. All “natural” disasters of recent years (“forest” fires, floods, landslides, earthquakes, tsunamis, nuclear disasters, etc.) took place under the baton of geoengineering climate-fighting weapons. Scientists – geo-engineers – Climate-meteorological / climatic weapons controllers are the instrument of elites that deliberately organize these disasters to achieve their various goals, and there is no crime to stop them. There is all the evidence that the official media will never inform as long as they are ruled by those elites. They will keep silent about them as long as possible, and if it does not work, the evidence and its bearers will try to discredit them by all means. But ordinary people still share this information on the Internet, and it seems that the credibility of the “official” media for the past year has dropped and is steadily declining. Back to the current fires in California that are still burning and leaving dozens of dead and hundreds missing that I would not have expected among the living … California witnesses on private channels on YouTube, website and alternative media publish documents about strange anomalies of fires suggesting this that these fires were deliberately ignited, probably by using DEW weapons placed on satellites and / or drones. (DEW = Directed Energy Weapons = guns using controlled energy – laser, microwaves, scalar waves.) Documents (in English) are a lot to do with, even pictures directly proving the effects of DEW. You can find the best summaries of photos, videos, and comments on the State of the Nation Alternative News and The Millennium Report, and many more. (I do not make direct links because access to some alternative sites via the link / bookmark is currently being monitored / blocked by elite / google, and you might indicate that the site does not exist or warn it is dangerous. But they can be easily found by the search engine.) So I’m going to have some pictures today to get an idea and maybe get some more information. At least one link to an article with photographic documentation: Evidence that California is under the DEW weapon attack: http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=108152  The strangest fire of all times – different anomalies.

1. Selectivity. The most striking feature is the selectivity of the fires. As the photographs show, the fires were able to pick their targets exactly. The houses are destroyed in the foundations (8,000 houses at all), but the trees / forests in the neighborhood remain intact, even in close proximity. How come when the houses are being ignited by a forest fire? See satellite imagery below:

2. Strange burning houses Houses are “lying ash” to the foundations, mostly very few debris (at least some good: they will not have to clear it so much). All nicely uniform on white ash / dust. It is true that houses built predominantly from wood easily burn. (Firefighters say somewhere that once a fire takes 5% of a wooden house, then it can not be extinguished). But we would expect different houses to have different layouts and “fillings” so they should burn differently from different locations, and the result of normal burning should be at least a bit of black burning and some burned debris. But it is here all in one uniformly aligned with the earth. White burns can mean that there has been a fire / explosion / explosion with a very high temperature that normal fire does not usually reach, or the object has been destroyed by some other destruction – we are again with DEW. (Somehow, the WTC’s “wreckage” was after the 9/11 destruction). More pictures below: Houses destroyed, trees OK.

3. Strange burning of materials. In many incinerators, molten metal is molten, as if fired at a higher temperature than normal fire. Witnesses report broken concrete, porcelain, curled glass = melted glass. While normally flammable materials – paper, plastics, twigs – on the same “burning” are preserved. See, for example, the picture below, the car burns like a torch, a burning paper is lying around. Image: Proof of use of weapons to controlled energy. Cars burn like torches, paper is lying around. “Fire” has destroyed many California wine cellars. The following video is a compilation of damage in several California wine cellars: it shows strong uneven temperatures in a single “fire”. For example, glass bottles are deformed, while metal racks retain their shape. Molten bottles, but the paper napkins besides did not burn. The bottles melted, but the vineyard shrubs remained cool. Paper labels remained on the bottles. Etc. etc.

Image: molten glass bottles in a wine cellar. The forest stands in the background. See video: Fire has melted the whole glass cellars of wine bottles https://youtu.be/tnPTxummBXs  How do the firefighters ignore homes at a distance? Hypothesis about Smart Meters. It seems as if the arsonists were able to focus their firearms precisely on buildings (and cars, the next time). Based on what? In the US, many households have so-called “Smart Meters” – wirelessly communicating smart power meters that are heavily enforced by the government, and are extensively expanded in California; Under this hypothesis, these meters can emit a drones-trap signal, and they can precisely target their energy-driven beams. (See video: Californian fires: Weapons DEW? Smart meters? Https://youtu.be/ViLKCrfmdmw  ). Next time: How strangely cars burned.

http://orgo-net.blogspot.com/2018/11/pozary-v-kalifornii-byly-zapaleny.html 

http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=110054 

:: 12--18 The Common Sense Show :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

The Weaponization of Water in the US

By Dave Hodges

@WalshFreedom

How much is the fine if you dare to take a shower, do laundry, AND run your sprinklers all in the same day? California is awful. Just awful. Inez Stepman @InezFeltscher

Assemblywoman Laura Friedman, D-Glendale, the author of AB 1668 perpetrated a bill that gave California the power which made it illegal to take a shower and do laundry on the same day. $1,000 fine if you go above your allotted 55 gallons of water per day. Utility companies are encouraging neighbors to spy on neighbors to ensure compliance. The liberal establishment has minimized the effects of the law, but offer no facts in opposition. Here is an analysis: The bill, until January 1, 2025, would establish 55 gallons per capita daily as the standard for indoor residential water use, beginning January 1, 2025, would establish the greater of 52.5 gallons per capita daily or a standard recommended by the department and the board as the standard for indoor residential water use, and beginning January 1, 2030, would establish the greater of 50 gallons per capita daily or a standard recommended by the department and the board as the standard for indoor residential water use. The bill would impose civil liability for a violation of an order or regulation issued pursuant to these provisions, as specified.

The restrictions are omnipresent:

An 8-minute shower uses about 17 gallons of water

A load of laundry uses about 40 gallons of water if you do not have a new HE washer

An average-to-large bathtub can hold as much as 80 to 110 gallons of water

A dishwasher uses anywhere from 5.5-15 gallons of water

If you add together a 17-gallon shower with a 40-gallon load of laundry, you get 57 gallons of water, which exceeds your allotment of 55 gallons. Since this is now a law, breaking it, by definition, is illegal…

This bill became law last summer. However, recent events have taken this to an entirely new level.

One has to tip their hat to the globalists for their dynamic and flexible approach to achieve total global domination through the creation of scenarios that will lead to massive war, war that will lead to political and economic unification under the New World Order. This is a classic case of the Hegelian Dialectic in action. In reality, the plan to bring the world to its knees through the global elite’s creation of artificial water shortages, is already underway in California. The reports from the DIA and the UN should be labeled status reports, instead of futuristic projections. Consider the following water-related facts from an existing set of realities. Twenty percent of the world’s population, presently lack access to an adequate supply of clean drinking water. Global water consumption is doubling every 20 years, more than twice the rate of human population growth. The Progress Of Contrived Water Shortages The above-mentioned facts can be exploited by the globalists through controlling water supplies and creating more artificial shortages. The globalist plan to bring the world to its knees by controlling water is already bearing fruit as 31 countries currently face water scarcity. Globalist industries have been doing their part to ferment this conspiracy as more than half the world’s major rivers are either dead or are hopelessly polluted. More evidence to support the notion that the globalist plan is working is evidenced by the fact that, in third world countries, water borne illnesses account for most deaths. Water safety issues are being exacerbated and the death curve is dramatically spiking. Tragically, these deaths are almost completely preventable. As both the UN and DIA reports mention, that by 2025, two-thirds of the world’s population will live in absolute water scarcity and accompanying food shortages. There will no shortage of willing and desperate soldiers to fight in the coming water wars.

https://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/the-weaponization-of-water-in-the-us/ 

:: 12-3-18 SHTF Plan :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

More Surveillance State Moves: The U.S. Will Lose Liberty Before (And If) It’s Restored

Jeremiah Johnson December 3rd, 2018 SHTFplan.com Comments (66) Read by 3,914 people

:: 12--18 The Organic Prepper :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Biometric Scanning Has Rolled Out in Atlanta International Airport: “One Look And You’re In”

By Meadow Clark

Atlanta airport’s Terminal F has become the “first biometric terminal” in the United States. And Detroit is next… As of December 1, Delta Airlines rolled out biometric scanning for air travel at the Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL), Terminal F. International passengers will be able to use facial recognition scans from “curb to gate” to get through every facet of their air travel. While the face scans are lauded as a great way to save time, they really aren’t as you’ll see below. I’m sure any travel-weary person can think of many ways that air travel could become more convenient and efficient. I mean, one of the strangest paradoxes of our technologically advanced world is that it’s 2018 and air travel is the most miserable experience. It becomes more miserable every year and no one even wants to hear comedians talk about it anymore because miserable air travel is such a foregone conclusion. Not to be mean, but people have already lined up before the biometric scanners like sheep, seemingly without even flinching at the new development. Or rather, more like deer in the headlights. Nothing new here…just your friendly neighborhood facial scans. ZAP! Biometric scanners are optional…for NOW. For now, the biometric scanners are being presented as an “option.” Delta et al. call it an option any time they reference biometric scanning perhaps to soften the edges a bit. Of course, in time this will be the only option for air travel and Delta is in a hurry to roll out the scanners at the other international airports. But please don’t believe the tripe about how this is all for everyone’s convenience. It clearly isn’t when you see who Delta partnered with to make biometric scanners a reality. Last week, Delta announced: Today, Delta Air Lines, in partnership with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL) and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), unveiled the first biometric terminal in the United States at Maynard H. Jackson International Terminal (Terminal F) in Atlanta, announced earlier this fall. This means that customers flying direct to an international destination on Delta, Aeromexico, Air France, KLM or Virgin Atlantic Airways can use facial recognition technology from curb to gate, including to:

Check in at the self-service kiosks in the International lobby

Drop checked baggage at the counters in the International lobby

Serve as identification at the TSA checkpoint

Board a flight at any gate in Terminal F

And, go through CBP processing for international travelers arriving into the U.S.

Flickr (Photo by John Paul Van Wert/Rank Studios 2018) CC BY 2.0

“We’re removing the need for a customer checking a bag to present their passport up to four times per departure – which means we’re giving customers the option of moving through the airport with one less thing to worry about, while empowering our employees with more time for meaningful interactions with customers,” – Gil West, Delta’s COO

How Does Biometric Scanning Work At the Airport? USA Today writes: Delta says customers enter their passport information during online check-in. Or, at the airport, customers can scan their passport to check in. Next, passengers can click “look” as they check in at one of Delta’s automated kiosks. Travelers’ face scans will be matched to passport or visa photos on file with U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Delta says customers have the same option as they “approach the camera at the counter in the lobby, the TSA checkpoint or when boarding at the gate.” The mainstream media is giddy for the new, invasive advancements all for a little more “convenience” that could exist with a little more efficiency like in other countries’ international flights. The MSM certainly isn’t emphasizing any critiques if there are any. “It is a great honor for Detroit Metropolitan Airport to become one of the nation’s first biometric terminals,” gushed Chad Newton, the interim CEO of the Wayne County Airport Authority of the Detroit airport. We look forward to partnering with Delta, CBP, and TSA to provide passengers with the option to utilize facial recognition throughout their entire travel process.” The “option” – while it is still an option and not mandatory – will become available to international passengers flying nonstop from Atlanta on Delta’s partner airlines Aeromexico, Air France-KLM or Virgin Atlantic. They really want you to feel that facial recognition is good. Facial recognition is good! It’s only a problem if a social media network makes use of it without telling the public. But now it’s good! “Nearly all 25,000 customers who travel through ATL Terminal F each week are choosing this optional process, with less than 2 percent opting out,” Delta beamed. “And, based on initial data, the facial recognition option is saving an average of two seconds for each customer at boarding, or nine minutes when boarding a widebody aircraft,” they added. Wow, did you hear that? You are saving two whole seconds at boarding… Delta will introduce this “curb to gate” biometric option in Detroit early 2019. What Can I Do to Avoid Biometric Scanners at the Airport? Unfortunately, facial recognition is not something most people can control anymore. It happens online, via our passports and through Big Brother cameras posted in the public. Tighter security measures make it more difficult to wear things that obscure your face when you go through the airport or into the bank or stores etc… But you can refuse to travel Delta and let representatives know that you won’t be voting for them if they continue evaporating your right to privacy. In the long run, this is what we are looking at as the new “normal.”  However, if your dollar still counts, why not choose a different international airline such as Emirates Airline? Their “coach” flights are as nice as a first-class domestic flight in the United States. And they know it! Just look at Emirates’ new marketing campaign. This is not an endorsement but just look at it! And check out this lush air cabin tour. Look at all that wonderful space for your arms and legs, ahhhhhh. “Don’t just fly, fly better,” says their slogan. Meanwhile, there’s an American up in a Delta jet saying, “fly better? Is that a thing that exists? You mean I don’t have to sit on this person’s lap and get sneezed on and beg for more pretzels? I’d get free drinks and complimentary food? And hot towels?”  Yes, dear American. This thing does exist. And anyone who has flown to another country knows that the airport experiences there are worlds different than the U.S. You start taking off your belt and shoes there and you might be stopped for indecent exposure! I hear nothing but good things from people who have flown Emirates, although this is just one option to avoid companies like Delta. And the travelers I hear from testify that the commercials are accurate, including the smiles from the proud employees. If this is true and Emirates Airline set up shop in the United States, then all of our airlines would be out of business in weeks. Which means they can change… That’s why U.S. airlines should be ashamed, but the miserable, smelly air travel experience seems to be part of a bigger plan to crimp the freedom to travel. What do you think about biometric scanners in airports? Are you concerned about biometric scanners as a passage to travel? Would you ever use it? Why or why not? Do you still even travel by air? Let us know below!

[ :: 8-17-14 pm service (third word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::]

:: 12-9-18 Israel Islam & End Times :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

‘Europe is finished,’ leading lawyer says as he leaves UK for Israel

‘It’s time to wander again,’ Mark Lewis tells fellow Jews facing rising anti-Semitism in Britain and across Europe.

By External Source - December 9, 2018

A top British lawyer and his partner immigrated to Israel this week, citing rising anti-Semitism in Europe. “Europe in my view is finished. Every day you see people being attacked in one way or another across Europe,” Mark Lewis told Israel’s Channel 10 news, which accompanied his arrival, together with partner Mandy Blumenthal, at Israel’s Ben Gurion Airport. “You see people murdered in museums in Belgium, people murdered in schools in France, people attacked in England. There is only one place for Jewish people to go,” Lewis added. Lewis, 54, one of the UK’s leading libel lawyers, said he has been increasingly subjected to hate speech and threats for being Jewish, including being subjected to regular abuse and death threats online. The decision to leave Britain did not come easily, the couple has said, but they feel it was inevitable. “We’re a wandering people, and it’s time to wander again. People just don’t want to see it,” Lewis said of his fellow British Jews. “We’ve accelerated our decision of moving to go to Israel because of anti-Semitism being so institutional and accepted in mainstream life,” Blumenthal charged. “So many people have these ideas about Jews being responsible for every disaster that’s ever happened in the world.” Lewis and Blumenthal first publicized their intention to leave for Israel in an interview with the BBC in August. They said they knew other people who are considering leaving the country because of anti-Semitism. In the interview, the couple also blamed the leadership of Labour under Jeremy Corbyn for creating an atmosphere that allows anti-Semitic feelings to bubble up, and largely dismissed Corbyn’s assertion that anti-Semitism is not tolerated in the party. “Jeremy Corbyn moved the rock, and the anti-Semites crawled out from underneath the rock. They’re not going back,” said Lewis. “There’s been a total climate change. It’s become acceptable to be anti-Semitic. It’s brought out people’s feelings to the surface,” Blumenthal said. She said though Corbyn and Labour are not solely responsible for the recent anti-Semitism, they have a “very loud part” in its rise. “It’s not just Jeremy Corbyn and it’s not all of the Labour party. But it’s a very, very loud part of it that’s actually enabled this anti-Semitism to foster here in the UK and go throughout society,” she said. Lewis said while anti-Semitism was a fringe phenomenon in the past, it is has become more prominent due to social media. “Social media has caused so much harm,” he said. “Fifteen years ago there was still anti-Semitism but it was an obscure thing. Fifteen years ago somebody painted a swastika on my garage door in Manchester, that was a message. But it was a one-off, it was something you could almost laugh off. Now with the effect of social media, it’s almost every day.” Lewis, who in an interview with The Times of Israel last year said he likes to take on anti-Semitic trolls on social media, said he has also faced anti-Semitism when trying to raise the issue. “If you complain about anti-Semitism, the most anti-Semitic thing is said back to you: You’re making it up, it’s all a smear, you haven’t even got the right to complain,” he said. He said he was bombarded with messages of hate from “people who claim to represent [grassroots Corbyn backing group] Momentum, who claim to represent the Labour Party.” Explaining the couple’s decision to move to Israel, Lewis said “there is only so much you can take.” “The online abuse might continue, the Israelis might not like me because I am too left, might not like me because they think I am too right, whatever their view. But they are not going to dislike me because I am Jewish. And there is only so much you can take – when you are getting threats to kill you.” “When you are getting threats from people that they want you to be ill, etc. It’s a drip drip effect,” said Lewis, who suffers from multiple sclerosis. “And where do you say ‘actually, enough is enough.’” In response to the couple’s interview, a Labour spokesperson said Corbyn is a “militant opponent” of anti-Semitism and committed to uprooting it from the party. Blumenthal, however, said she did not believe Corbyn’s expressed commitment to addressing Labour’s anti-Semitism problems. “Words are cheap. I honestly believe that when I hear Jeremy Corbyn’s words, they’re cheap, they’re excuses, they’re not actually expressing his true feelings. I don’t believe him,” she said. In August, Corbyn faced renewed criticism after the Daily Mail newspaper published photos of him holding a wreath during a 2014 ceremony at a Tunisian cemetery. It appeared from the snapshots that Corbyn was standing near the graves of Palestinian terrorists involved in the massacre of 11 Israeli athletes at the Munich Olympics in 1972. The scandal is only the latest round in a long-running crisis for the Labour Party, with a constant stream of members and prominent officials being forced out or chastised for making anti-Semitic and virulent anti-Israel comments, and Corbyn himself criticized for tolerating and/or being part of the problem. The fracas has seen excoriation from rabbis, including Britain’s chief rabbi, as well as from some of Labour’s own MPs, charging that the party and its leader seem unable or unwilling to decisively excise anti-Semitic members and sentiments from Labour’s ranks. Source: Times of Israel

:: 12--18 Prophecy News Watch :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Canadian Christians Branded As "UnCanadian" For Traditional Religious Beliefs

Attacks on freedom of religion and freedom of conscience are a near-constant in Canadian news cycles of late, from physicians fighting in court for the right not to refer for procedures they find immoral to religious schools battling the government in court to maintain the independence and integrity of their institutions. Many religious views have been recast by many progressive politicians and academics (with the obedient acquiescence of the media) as hateful and even vicious, and as such it is open season on those who dare to hold these views and worse, speak of them aloud. So I am not surprised that a recent study by the Angus Reid Institute in partnership with Cardus, a conservative think tank based out of Ottawa, indicated that only 59% of Canadians say that religious freedom makes our country a better place, leaving a full 41% that presumably feel that religious freedom makes our country a worse place, or at least feel ambivalent about a fundamental freedom. Ray Pennings of Cardus broke it down recently in the Hamilton Spectator: While a clear majority sees the benefits of religious freedom, it’s curious that more of us aren’t enthusiastic about this fundamental human right. What’s at play here? There are likely several factors, including a hardcore secularist viewpoint, though this remains a minority view in Canada. The same survey used a series of measures to classify Canadians among three categories — those welcoming of faith in public life, those who are unsure and those hostile to it. The proponents of public faith are the largest group at 37 per cent, while the other two weigh in at 32 per cent each. Only 31 per cent of the group hostile to public faith say religious freedom makes Canada better. An almost equal proportion says it makes Canada worse. Clearly, hardcore secularism contains a fervent opposition to religion and its free expression. Related to that secularism could be prejudice against public displays of faith. Indeed, half of Canadians say they’re uncomfortable with religious garments or symbols in the workplace — something that disproportionately affects Muslims, Jews and Sikhs. Such discomfort may translate into lower support for religious freedom. Still, that’s not the whole story. Could it also be that some Canadians feel that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms’ guarantee of religious freedom doesn’t adequately protect them? If so, their answer about religious freedom may reflect their judgment on the effectiveness of Charter protections. Seven in 10 Canadians say they feel the federal government respects their religious community. And almost six in 10 say Canadian society either makes room for their faith and values or has little impact on them…Now the bad news: Christians don’t fare as well. Overall, Catholics and other Christians feel less respected by government and less welcome in society than non-Christians do. But it’s Canada’s evangelical Protestants who feel especially marginalized. They’re the most likely to say the feds disrespect them, with four in 10 evangelicals saying so. And just over half of this religious minority says society shuts them out. They may not be enjoying all the benefits of religious freedom. This finding is unsurprising given the news of the last year: Evangelicals and other Christians bore the brunt of the federal government’s Canada Summer Jobs fiasco, which filtered out grant recipients based on their beliefs. Legal challenges are ongoing but haven’t borne fruit yet. The evangelical Trinity Western University in B.C. faced discrimination by several law societies opposed to it setting up a law school — discrimination that the Supreme Court of Canada eventually upheld. And in Alberta, it’s mostly evangelical schools that are threatened with the loss of funding over an ideological disagreement with the provincial government. But could there also be some amnesia about the fundamental human right of religious freedom? What many may not realize is that religious freedom is not just for the religious; it benefits everyone. It protects the ability of the religious and non-religious to act according to their deepest beliefs — informing our freedoms of speech, association and assembly. More Canadians need to see and understand this connection. The fact that they don’t, of course, can be tied to a number of things. Traditional Christian views are now considered to be widely “offensive,” a word now frequently used to justify censorship. People are simply less tolerant of being exposed to ideas they dislike, and less willing to engage in discussion. Our current prime minister’s rhetoric doesn’t help: Justin Trudeau has consistently condemned traditional Christian beliefs as “unCanadian,” helping to cement the idea that Canadian Christians are somehow less Canadian because they are Christian. It is fascinating to me how such an a historical view can be so consistently propagated. Canada was founded on Judeo-Christian principles, and this fact was once widely known and understood. You cannot drive anywhere in this country without encountering evidence of Canada’s Christian heritage. The aging churches, the moss-covered Celtic crosses in the graveyards, the religious nature of the cenotaphs and memorials to the fallen. By the new standards of Justin Trudeau and his ideological fellow-travelers, the men and women who built this country are somehow less Canadian than they are because they believed different things about the fundamental nature of life and family. This view cannot be defended, and therefore it is easier for Trudeau and those like him to instead respond to disagreement with sneering and condescension. In the broad sweep of Canadian history, I would prefer to stand with those indomitable and hard-working men and women of faith who held to the traditions of their ancestors and thousands of years of revealed truth rather than a man who chases the progressive absurdities of the current moment and sneers at the noble generations who believed things he cannot understand.

Originally published at The Bridgehead - reposted with permission.

:: 12-5-18 Infowars :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

German Government Accused of Funding Brochure That Encourages Kids to Spy on Their “Right-Wing” Parents

Natural gender roles portrayed as being a right-wing trait

Paul Joseph Watson | Infowars.com - December 5, 2018

The Federal Ministry for Family Affairs in Germany has been accused of funding a brochure for kindergarten teachers that encourages children to spy on their “right-wing” parents. The 60-page manual was produced by the Berlin-based Amadeu Antonio Foundation (AAS), an watchdog organization that tackles racism and hate speech. It was co-funded by the Family Ministry, which is a cabinet-level ministry of the Federal Republic of Germany. The document offers teachers advice on situations such as, “How to deal with it when teachers or parents make anti-refugee or racist statements in front of children, or directly attack refugee children or parents?” Germany’s biggest newspaper BILD said the manual was a training guide for recruiting children as potential “informants” against their own parents, while right-wing party AfD said the NGO was employing “Stasi methods” to turn kids into snoopers.

[:: 8-20-17 am service (first word)  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

:: 12-6-18 All News Pipeline :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Blind, Rabid Hatred Ties NeverTrumpers To Their Liberal Counterparts In The Resistance As Another NeverTrump Publication Flounders

- NeverTrump Republicans Accepting Money From Soros-Connected Liberals To Fight Trump

By Susan Duclos - All News PipeLine December 6, 2018

With the recent reports that The Weekly Standard, once a highly lauded conservative magazine that turned into a home for NeverTrumpers in 2016, is preparing to shut down permanently, we note the similarities between them and liberal #resistance news outlets like CNN, who is suffering their own ratings apocalypse, and it comes down to more than "disagreeing" with the President, but rather a case of irrational, blind and rabid hatred. Emily Robinson from One America News Network helped break the news on her Twitter feed on December 4, stating "BREAKING: Multiple sources tell me that neocon magazine @weeklystandard is expected to close its operations in a few weeks. It had lost many subscribers since the 2016 election as its #NeverTrumper editors @BillKristol @stephenfhayes @SykesCharlie publicly aligned with the Left." NeverTrumpers are establishment conservatives who decided they would rather vote for Hillary Clinton, or not at all, than to see Donald Trump become President of the United States, not because his campaign promises were not conservative enough for them, and despite the fact that Trump's list of Supreme Court possible nominees were exactly who those conservatives would have chosen, but because they hated Donald Trump. Policy was not a consideration in many cases, only who Donald Trump was. He wasn't religious enough, he wasn't moral enough, he said what he wanted, when he wanted and wasn't "presidential" enough for their liking. Via The Daily Caller: The Weekly Standard was founded in 1995 by Bill Kristol and Fred Barnes. Originally owned by NewsCorp, the magazine was eventually sold in 2009 to billionaire Philip Anschutz. Individuals close to the magazine told TheDCNF that Anschutz was growing frustrated with the direction of the magazine. One of those NeverTrumpers was William (Bill) Kristol, one of the founders of The Weekly Standard in 1995, along with Fred Barnes. Kristol is still listed as Editor at Large for TWS. Kristol had reportedly said back in 2016 that he would rather see Hillary Clinton in the White House than Donald Trump. Kristol pushed for a brokered convention and then wanted a third party candidate to run if Trump became the GOP nominee, splitting the Republican vote which would have given the election to Clinton. Kristol and the Weekly Standard's demise is but one example of how blind, rabid hatred of one man, is destructive. In TWS' case, the destruction of a magazine that was a staple for conservative political junkies from 1995 until they allowed their Trump Derangement Syndrome to destroy their credibility. NEVERTRUMPERS ARE PART OF THE RESISTANCE NeverTrumpers like Kristol, Max Boot, and Washington Post's so-called conservative Jennifer Rubin,, among others, will claim they are simply sticking to "principles," but in many cases they have flipped their long-held positions on huge conservative topics, simply to oppose President Trump, or "resist" him, much like the far left liberals. One prime example of this is Jennifer Rubin, who was taken to task back in December 2017, by National Review's Charles Cooke, for her ever-changing positions, not based on any "principle," but based on who was the President. The illustrations are endless. In two years, Rubin has gone from arguing that the “ludicrous,” “absurd” Iran deal “has to go” — and, indeed, that John Kasich was a fool for contending otherwise – to praising those who believe it must remain in place as “reasonable” “experts,” and predicting that even to decertify would put “American credibility” at “risk.” In 2015, she wrote that “if you examine the Iran deal in any detail, you will be horrified as to what is in there.” In 2017, she characterizes this position as the “emotional” “temper tantrum” of an “unhinged president.” A similar metamorphosis has sullied her views on tax cuts, welfare, energy, and gun control (before, after), as well as her attitude toward Jews and anti-intellectuals, which once led her to defend Sarah Palin, but which now leads her to condemn Trump on almost all of the grounds she once dismissed. I use Cooke's criticisms of Rubin for a reason. Cooke is not exactly a fan of President Trump's and is as likely, or more so, to criticize President Trump as he is to praise him on policy, while still adhering to his prior positions on issues, and is able to acknowledge policy decisions he agrees with, without throwing in an ad hominem attack, every other sentence. In other words, unlike the others, Cooke is able to put his personal opinion of Trump the man to the side, to discuss Trump the President. Cooke is a Trump critic, but not so blinded by rabid hatred as to allow his dislike to discredit his work. NeverTrumpers on the other hand are exactly like their liberal counter-parts in the #resistance, in that policy doesn't matter, conservative goals and issues don't either, all that matters is resisting anything President Trump does, at all costs. NEVERTRUMPERS ATTITUDE PROBLEM Most all the well known "conservative" NeverTrumpers have the same "tone" in their articles, and even can be seen in their social media feeds. The attitude of we are "true" conservatives, as if anyone that disagrees with them are not conservative at all. As most were highly influential in the past, much like the establishment media, they almost always give the impression that they "know best," and the rest of the conservative peons should listen to their betters. Their waning influence, their inability to prevent Donald Trump of winning the 2016 GOP nomination, and the inability to wield their influence to prevent him from being elected President, appears to have left them angry at those that supported Donald Trump, or even just voted for him over Hillary Clinton when those were the only choices left, and that bitterness can be seen in almost everything they write and say in interviews. Look, NeverTrumpers have the right, the obligation even, to vote according to their own beliefs. What they don't seem to understand, because they are blinded by hate, is everyone else has that same right. Listening to them or reading their work, one often gets the impression of a parent lecturing their grown children on what they should or shouldn't be doing. Trying to regain their influence by opining on reasons why one should be allowing their "intellectual betters" to guide them and tell them who to support, what they should be prioritizing, what should be important to them. In this CRTV video brief below, we see who is funding certain NeverTrumpers. (Hint - Liberals connected to George Soros!) BOTTOM LINE We often see the so-called #Resistance on the left, and Nevertrumpers on the right, cast blame on President Trump for dividing the nation, without seeing the irony of their own blind and rabid hatred seeding those divisions. The criticisms from both groups often mimic each other. As seen above, those "principled" conservatives are more than willing to be funded by liberal groups, even those connected to George Soros. They would rather lie in bed with pro-abortion, gun control radicals, than to accept that the majority of Republicans disagreed with their establishment, political class opinions, and voted for President Trump in 2016. Also like those liberal resistance radicals, they are continuing to have their 3+ year temper tantrum against our President, and in the case of the Weekly Standard, we see the destruction it can cause. John Nolte over at Breitbart sums it up the best: Sarcasm aside, that is the Weekly Standard’s primary problem. In the age of Trump, the publication offers nothing we cannot get everywhere else in the elite media, nothing we cannot find at the far-left Washington Post, MSNBC, New York Times, CNN, etc. Smug virtue-signaling and superior Trump-bashing are the cheapest commodities in today’s news business. They are literally everywhere. And so, instead of offering a unique voice and perspective in an ocean of left-wing media, the Weekly Standard instead chose to sit in the middle of this ocean and sell saltwater. The bottom line here is there is nothing wrong with criticizing President Trump when one disagrees with his policy decisions, nor is there anything wrong with praising the choices we agree with, but allowing blind, rabid hatred to steer your ship, will eventually sink that same ship. Authors Note: While I stopped reading the Weekly Standard years ago, which is a valid choice in a free market, and I may dislike that the magazine and their writers became so full of vitriol, it is still heartbreaking to see so many be affected with the potential loss of their jobs, especially at this time of year.

[ :: 3-11-12 am service (first word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

etc. It is not the books that man writes, it is the word, the living word, the logos, the rhema, stay in my word, walk in my word, function in my word and you shall see what the EU is about ready to do, you shall understand what Russia is planning and purposing now, you shall even see China who is the last army that moves down into that valley after my church is gone. You will understand these things, for it is very clear in my word exactly what I shall do and you will not say, well, it must be fifteen years off, you will not say it must be ten years off, you will not say it must be five years off, for you shall see the signs clearly and you shall understand the hour, you shall understand the time and you will know.

:: 12-6-18 Hal Turner :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

URGENT: RUSSIA PUBLICLY WARNS IT WILL LAUNCH AGAINST ANY NATION HOUSING U.S. NUCLEAR WEAPONS

Category: World News Thursday, 06 December 2018 12:44

The Russian military has announced that any nation housing US medium and short-range nuclear missiles will be targeted by Russia and fired upon in the event of a major war. The announcement, made by Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Russia, Valery Gerasimov, represents the somewhat inevitable conclusion of the scandal caused by clear-cut US plans to withdraw from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty. Russia has criticized the move since day one of the American announcement to withdraw from the historic treaty, citing that it endangers European and international security and vowing a response. That response has now come. It is known that the targeting of highly-strategic missile bases in the event of potential war will be done with nuclear weapons given that the sheer threat such sites pose means they need to be decisively knocked-out with one powerful punch. In other words, Russia has now threatened to extend its nuclear response beyond American targets in the event of a war between it and US forces, to virtually any country that houses American medium and short-range nuclear-armed missiles, whether that nation has attacked Russia or not.

:: 12--18 Russia News Now :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

America Must Immediately Exit These Three Groups In Order to Survive:THE UNITED NATIONS ,NATO AND THE FEDERAL RESERVE MUST BE NATIONALIZED!

By Dave Hodges The Common Sense Show

There are three organizations that America must exit immediately, if the Constitution and our standard of living is to survive. The three groups whose actions demand our quick and immediate . There are very specific dangers that globalization holds for America. Prewithdrawal from are NATO, the United Nations and any form of central banking participation. NATO. the United Nations, the United Nations and the central banks are working towards the unification pf the planet from a political, economic and culturevious regionalization efforts have demonstrated the development of a midpoint. For example, if economic consolidation is needed among several currencies, there needs to be an established level of value for the regional currency and eventually the global currency. For example if Currency A, the highest currency to be regionalized is worth 20 times more than the lowest currency, Currency B, which is worth $10. A midpoint must be established. In this simple example, the people holding Currency A would have to lower their currency to $15. this would represent a 50% drop in value. If we exclude for the 2/3’rds of illegal immigrants who are on welfare and the 35% of Americans that are on welfare, Americans have the highest standard of living. However, that would be given away through a regionalization/globalization of the currency. If you are an American citizen, you have the only system of government, a Constitutional Republic, in which civil liberties are enumerated and guaranteed regardless of who is in power. At best, there are other nations that say their people have sNuch liberties as freedom of speech, however, they exist in a Communitarian system of government in which rights are only guaranteed until it is no longer in the greater good. And who decides what is in the “greater good” or the “common interest”? Macron does not need to raise an European army to oppose Russia, China and the US as he stated last week. NATO has become the defacto army of the EU. On behalf of their central banker benefactors, NATO is doing its best to provoke WW III with Russia. They are rallying along the Russia border in a clear attempt provoke a Russian response. NATO is helping the Ukraine militarily challenge Russia, violate territorial waters and provoke Russian ships on the high seas. It is obvious that NATO is looking for a trigger event that will set off WW III. There is not one action that NATO is taking in terms of supporting the needs of the American people or its government. Yet, American financial support forms the backbone of the organization. The time to exit has come and there is an immediate need to withdraw. If we do not, millions of Americans will die in the war NATO is trying to provoke. The United Nations can be characterized as a collection of tin horn dictatorships fully that do not respect the rule of law and fully embrace socialism which has miserably failed everywhere it has been employed. I recently did a broadcast which fully explored the claim that the UN recently made when they said there were going to be the global authority by the year 2030. Further, I covered how the UN is demanding that member nations fine and jail anyone who express criticism of UN migration policy. These facts alone fully expose the fully loss of sovereignty of the United States. The UN fully embraces forced vaccinations, abortion and assisted suicides. They hold Christianity in disdain and frequently legislate against the religion. Their peacekeepers are anything but peacekeepers. They are frequently present where genocide is ongoing and the best example was Rwanda. The clear goal of the UN is the erasure of complete sovereignty for each member state. If the people of this country ever become a member of any global governance overseen by the UN, we could expect to see the complete loss of our constitutionally guaranteed freedoms. Under the UN our border security will be erased thus opening the door to terrorists entering who have bad intentions. You will experience the loss of self-expression, the right bear arms in self-defense and there will likely be no real due process. The time to exit the is now and the need is immediate. Presently, the Federal Reserve is raising interest rates in the midst of a low inflationary environment. This is devastating to an economy and is contributing to ups and downs of the stock market. The Federal Reserve would rather win the day for globalism than to protect the dollar. In fact the FED has announced they are staring their own bitcoin in 2019. I believe this is their escape hatch. Why does the Federal Reserve oppose Trump and is willing to deliberately hurt the economy? Because they oppose his brand of nationalism. They are dedicated to the formation of a globalist new world order. I would be remiss if did not mention the following (Henslin, Introduction to Sociology, 2015, page 412): From 1800-1913, the value of the dollar remained unchanged After the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913, the value of the dollar had dropped to three cents by 2015. The time to leave the Federal Reserve is now. The debt, owed almost exclusively to the bankers, needs to be repudiated. I recently interviewed ex-CIA Robert Steele, and he clearly stated the Federal Reserve must be nationalized. We are being assimilated into the collective. Your economic future, your sovereignty and freedoms are at risk. The only solution is for President Trump to use his power to withdraw from all three groups. Putin and China are in the same boat. America and Russia should form the new alliance with Russia after firing Mueller and indicting every Democratic Congress person who is aligned with foreign elements and have declared these allegiances (eg Feinstein, Schumer, Pelosi, et al). Russia and America are the new NATO. Debt repudiation is the new economic policy. National sovereignty trumps international law and treaties. This is all about nationalism vs globalism. It is 30 seconds to midnight.

:: 12-6-18 All News Pipeline :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Are We Sleepwalking Into Armageddon? Expert Warns Nuclear War Could Be Triggered By 'Trump Derangement Syndrome'

- Is WW3 The Globalists End Game? Civil Unrest Would Begin In Hours If Not Minutes

By Stefan Stanford - All News Pipeline - Live Free Or Die December 6, 2018

Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump

Some people HATE the fact that I got along well with President Putin of Russia. They would rather go to war than see this. It's called Trump Derangement Syndrome! 7:27am - 18 Jul 2018

According to this important new story over at The Nation written by Stephen F. Cohen, an expert on U.S.-Russian relations, a nuclear war between America and Russia is increasingly growing likely due to the 'RussiaGate' allegations being spewed by the left for the last two years. Warning immediately within his story that the new 'US-Russia cold war' is even more dangerous than its 40-year predecessor that our planet thankfully survived, Cohen then hinted we may be 'sleepwalking' into Armageddon, with the possibility of a nuclear catastrophe rarely discussed within the mainstream media nor mainstream political discussions. Warning then that the latter months of 2018 have been littered with a mounting series of crises that only continue to grow worse, he then outlines for us how the core 'Russiagate' allegations have become a central part of this new cold war, constraining President Trump from working with Russian President Vladimir Putin to help cool the growing tensions. Paul Joseph Watson breaks down for us in the only video at the bottom of this story just how “Trump Derangement Syndrome” could actually 'trigger' this 'new cold war' to go 'hot' as even President Trump himself warned of in a tweet back in July as seen in the screenshot at the top of this story. From Cohen's story over at The Nation: In the latter months of 2018, the facts and the mounting crises they document grow worse, especially in the US political-media establishment, where, as I have argued, the new Cold War originated and has been repeatedly escalated. Consider a few examples, some of them not unlike political and media developments during the run-up to the US war in Iraq or, historians have told us, how the great powers “sleepwalked” into World War I: § Russiagate’s core allegations—US-Russian collusion, treason—all remain unproven. Yet they have become a central part of the new Cold War. If nothing else, they severely constrain President Donald Trump’s capacity to conduct crisis negotiations with Moscow while they further vilify Russian President Vladimir Putin for having, it is widely asserted, personally ordered “an attack on America” during the 2016 presidential campaign. Some Hollywood liberals had earlier omitted the question mark, declaring, “We are at war.” In October 2018, the would-be titular head of the Democratic Party, Hillary Clinton, added her voice to this reckless allegation, flatly stating that the United States was “attacked by a foreign power” and equating it with “the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.” Clinton may have been prompted by another outburst of malpractice by The New York Times and The Washington Post. On September 20 and 23, respectively, those exceptionally influential papers devoted thousands of words, illustrated with sinister prosecutorial graphics, to special retellings of the Russiagate narrative they had assiduously promoted for nearly two years, along with the narrative’s serial fallacies, selective and questionable history, and factual errors. And for those who somehow insanely believe that a war between America and Russia might be a 'good thing', as Dr. Peter Vincent Pry warned in this December 2nd story on ANP, even the United States military is finally warning about what such a war with Russia might bring in an extraordinary and sobering new report: nothing less than the end of 'America'. We've gone ahead and embedded the US military's new report in full at the bottom of this story for all to read if you haven't yet had the opportunity but be forewarned, the results show an America looking much closer to what the globalist-linked website Deagel.com is forecasting for America in 2025 than the America we live in today in 2018. As we've previously reported on ANP, without even detonating a nuclear weapon in a US city, Russia, China, Iran or terrorists who've gotten a hold of a nuclear weapon could inflict massive carnage upon America by exploding a nuclear weapon high over America. And as former Green Beret Jeremiah Johnson recently reported within this story over at SHTFPlan, he considers an EMP or nuclear war to be two of the three methods that the globalists may eventually use to usher in their 'end game' for America with the third method being a lethal, bio-engineered virus to help cull the masses. While many mainstream media outlets have called the 'EMP effect' science fiction, this new US military report confirms what people such as Dr. Peter Vincent Pry, Steve Quayle and others have long been warning about. And we get more confirmation of those warnings long given by the 'Watchmen' in this Washington Examiner story.: While it is focused on the devastating impact an EMP hit would have on the military, it appears to support a congressional warning that up to 90 percent of the population on the East Coast would die in a year of an attack that would dismantle or interfere with electricity, transportation, food processing, and healthcare. Consider just some of the warnings in the report from the United States Air Force Air University and the Curtis E. LeMay Center for Doctrine Development and Education. Citing figures from the Union of Concerned Scientists, the report: 99 nuclear reactors would likely melt down without electricity to cool them. 4.1 million would be displaced from areas around the nuclear plants as the radioactive cloud spread. Military and commercial jets, such as those built by Airbus, could be degraded. "Alarmingly, aircraft designed to carry large numbers of people and sizable cargo are allowed to operate without certainty about their level of resilience." Bases would be cut off, making defense and counter-attacks impossible. Civil unrest would start in “hours.” Power and GPS could go dark. “An EMP would cause instantaneous and simultaneous loss of many technologies reliant on electrical power and computer circuit boards, such as cell phones and GPS devices.” “Failures may include long-term loss of electrical power (due to loss of emergency generators), sewage, fresh water, banking, landlines, cellular service, vehicles.” 18 months or more are required to replace key elements of the electric grid that would be damaged or knocked out. According to this new story over at the Daily Mail that Steve Quayle had linked to on his website on Tuesday, Russia has just launched 5 new satellites into space and experts fear that they could be part of a new Russian secret weapon, weaponized to be used to destroy other satellites. And while their story didn't mention the satellites being used to deliver a nuclear weapon or EMP attack upon America, Dr. Pry and the US Congressional EMP Commission had previously confirmed that orbiting satellites could be used to do just that. And while ANP hasn't fallen for the propaganda making the rounds within the mainstream media that Russia is our dire enemy who wants to destroy us (they do realize that them dropping nukes on US soil means American nukes exploding upon Russian soil as well), we'll agree with Johnson that the 'globalist enemies of America within' are likely more danger to Americans than Russia ever will be, with Trump derangement syndrome pushing them and our world towards insanity. As we'd previously reported on ANP, should the corrupted faction of the deep state be held accountable for their myriad crimes against the American people, we'd expect nothing less than a burnt Earth take no prisoners attitude from them and with the globalists hands also elsewhere, such as the Ukraine, we wouldn't put it past them pushing the US into a war defending the Ukraine against Russia, possibly being the final straw that broke the camel's back. And as Johnson tells us in his story, despite President Trump working towards 'peace' between North and South Korea, the globalists have effectively kept North Korea in the game, potentially to be used as a patsy in a massive false flag EMP event to finish the 'takedown of America'. And all of this is designed to further strip away the rights of Americans while the globalists usher us ever further into their 'mark of the beast system'. From Johnson's story: By keeping North Korea in the game, they can be blamed any time the controllers decide to make it “lights out” with the EMP…it can be blamed on them. Notice the report is also big on the “solar storm” warning: another fallback position, for after a worldwide blackout with EMP(s), how would anyone be able to dispute that it was the sun? Simple matter to “persuade” any scientists who could argue the point to fall in lock step. The point is that North Korea is not “back” in the game: they were never out of it, and whether prompted by another nation or of their own accord, they do possess the capability of rendering an EMP strike against the United States. I do not avoid writing about it because the threat does not exist. I stand by my position that a nuclear war will begin with an attack by an EMP device, followed by an exchange of nukes. In the meantime, there are other things occurring that are destroying the country incrementally. My point of focus has been the development of the Surveillance State in the U.S. The (eventual) complete loss of liberty will be the result of the “Technocratic Society” being fully-formed that Brzezinski hungered for: with cameras in every home, tracking devices [cell phones, if you prefer] on every person, surveillance in every aspect of life, and a virtual-electronic police state completed. So with a nuclear war against Russia potentially as close as we've ever seen in our lifetimes, we'll close with several important excerpts from Club Orlov and their story "A Russian Warning", a story that while written back back on May 31st of 2016, prior to the presidential election, is still as relevant or more so now, at this very moment, than ever before. We, the undersigned, are Russians living and working in the USA. We have been watching with increasing anxiety as the current US and NATO policies have set us on an extremely dangerous collision course with the Russian Federation, as well as with China. Many respected, patriotic Americans, such as Paul Craig Roberts, Stephen Cohen, Philip Giraldi, Ray McGovern and many others have been issuing warnings of a looming a Third World War. But their voices have been all but lost among the din of a mass media that is full of deceptive and inaccurate stories that characterize the Russian economy as being in shambles and the Russian military as weak—all based on no evidence. But we—knowing both Russian history and the current state of Russian society and the Russian military, cannot swallow these lies. We now feel that it is our duty, as Russians living in the US, to warn the American people that they are being lied to, and to tell them the truth. And the truth is simply this: If there is going to be a war with Russia, then the United States will most certainly be destroyed, and most of us will end up dead. Their story continued, further confirming the US Military's new report as seen at the bottom of this story.: Thus, if tomorrow a war were to break out between the US and Russia, it is guaranteed that the US would be obliterated. At a minimum, there would no longer be an electric grid, no internet, no oil and gas pipelines, no interstate highway system, no air transportation or GPS-based navigation. Financial centers would lie in ruins. Government at every level would cease to function. US armed forces, stationed all around the globe, would no longer be resupplied. At a maximum, the entire landmass of the US would be covered by a layer of radioactive ash. We tell you this not to be alarmist, but because, based on everything we know, we are ourselves alarmed. If attacked, Russia will not back down; she will retaliate, and she will utterly annihilate the United States. And like the somber note delivered by the US military of America's destruction, their story concluded much the same, while telling the world outright that Russia has no intentions of attacking the US or any EU member state, unless they are attacked first. We are absolutely and categorically certain that Russia will never attack the US, nor any EU member state, that Russia is not at all interested in recreating the USSR, and that there is no “Russian threat” or “Russian aggression.” Much of Russia’s recent economic success has a lot to do with the shedding of former Soviet dependencies, allowing her to pursue a “Russia first” policy. But we are just as certain that if Russia is attacked, or even threatened with attack, she will not back down, and that the Russian leadership will not “blink.” With great sadness and a heavy heart they will do their sworn duty and unleash a nuclear barrage from which the United States will never recover. Even if the entire Russian leadership is killed in a first strike, the so-called “Dead Hand” (the “Perimetr” system) will automatically launch enough nukes to wipe the USA off the political map. We feel that it is our duty to do all we can to prevent such a catastrophe. So we urge ANP readers to please pray for a return to sanity for America and the planet with life as we know it sure to come to an end instantly for 325+ million Americans should nuclear war break out between the world's 2 global superpowers and potential extinction hanging in the balance should 99 nuclear power plants in America go into meltdown.

http://allnewspipeline.com/War_With_Russia_A_Globalists_End_Game.php 

[ :: 1-17-18 pm service  ::  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :::: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

the troubles that are going on here, the troubles that are going on there etc

:: 12-3-18 Hal Lindsey :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

A Cautionary Tale

By Hal Lindsey

At a campaign-style rally in Florida last week, President Trump used Sweden as an example of what happens when immigration policies become too lax. He said, “We’ve got to keep our country safe. You look at what’s happening in Germany, you look at what’s happening last night in Sweden. Sweden, who would believe this? Sweden. They took in large numbers. They’re having problems like they never thought possible.” The media focused on the words, “last night,” but nothing out of the ordinary happened in Sweden the night before Mr. Trump’s remarks. Some Swedes felt offended by the remark, and struck back. Former Swedish Prime Minister, Carl Bildt, tweeted, “Sweden? Terror attack? What has he been smoking?” Speaking on the Fox News program, The Five, Bob Beckel seemed on the verge of losing control, yelling, “This president flat-out lied!” But President Trump never said there had been a terrorist incident in Sweden the night before. It’s easy to see how people got that impression, but they inferred it. He did not say it. Later, the President tweeted an explanation. “My statement as to what’s happening in Sweden was in reference to a story that was broadcast on @FoxNews.com concerning immigrants & Sweden.” Beyond the smoke and dust of the bruhaha over exactly what he meant, there is an extremely important point. Sweden’s immigration policy over the last 40 years stands as a cautionary tale for all nations. Sweden has long been a peaceful and prosperous nation. They used extremely controversial means to achieve their success, but they have had a lot of it. A 2005 commentary in the liberal London newspaper, The Guardian, called Sweden, “The most successful society the world has ever known.” That statement has never really been true of Sweden, but it shows the regard in which it was held not so long ago, particularly among liberals. Today things have changed. And the problem, as President Trump was trying to point out, largely traces back to irresponsible immigration policies. In 1975, the Swedish Parliament decided to bring in massive numbers of Muslims from the Middle East. Since then, violent crime has risen 300%! The number of rapes reported to police increased 1,472% — from 421 in 1975 to 6,620 in 2014. Sweden now has the highest per capita incidence of rape of any major nation on earth. A survey by the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention, an official government agency, shows that less than 25% of rapes in Sweden are even reported to police. Lest you think these are domestic issues, their study also found that, “In 58% of cases, the perpetrator was entirely unknown by the victim.” In an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal, prominent Swedish politicians, Jimmie Akesson and Mattias Karlsson, wrote, “Mr. Trump did not exaggerate Sweden’s current problems. If anything, he understated them.” Just a couple of days after the President’s remarks, riots broke out in an immigrant neighborhood of Stockholm. They set vehicles on fire, threw objects at police, damaged buildings, and looted businesses. The same area saw riots in 2010 and 2013. As a Christian minister, part of my job is to point out the vast differences between the Gospel and other systems of thought, including Islam. But the United States government does not have my job. It can’t take sides among religious faiths. Yet, it must keep U.S. citizens as safe as it can while adhering to the Constitution, the law, and our nation’s core principles. Here’s the bottom line. The United States government doesn’t need to address the relative merits or demerits of Islam. But it does need to carefully vet anyone who wants to enter this country from a nation known to be a hotbed of terrorism. The White House has said that President Trump will probably issue a new version of his executive order on immigration sometime next week. The original order is tied up in the courts. It singled out seven nations — Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. It was not a travel ban from these countries, but a 90-day pause. We can expect the new order to cover the same countries. These nations are all predominantly Muslim. But the order was not a Muslim ban. The Obama Administration had already named these seven as “countries of concern.” President Obama was not singling them out because they are predominantly Muslim, but because they are hotbeds of terrorism, and because of the difficulty in vetting people from these countries. The Trump Administration took it a step further. It said it needs a 90-day pause in which to figure out how to safely allow immigration from these trouble spots. On a recent Hal Lindsey Report, I explained the reasons behind the choice of nations. “Each of them is known to have large numbers of terrorists and terrorist-sympathizers at every level of their societies. Six of the seven are either in the midst of, or in the immediate aftermath of, civil war. The seventh is the world’s most prolific state-sponsor of terrorism — Iran.” The new Administration needs time to find ways to appropriately vet people from nations in the middle of such chaos. And, to use the President’s words, it should be “extreme vetting.” We know that ISIS, al-Qaeda, and other terrorists regularly move among nations as immigrants. So, we must use every precaution. We don’t want them to bring here the kind of chaos they say they’re trying to leave behind. Remember Sweden.

https://www.hallindsey.com/ww-2-24-2017/ 

[:: 2-3-14 am service (first word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :::: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]

:: 12-4-18 BBC News :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Israel targets Hezbollah 'terror tunnels'

4 December 2018

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-46437629 

:: 12-5-18 Breaking Israel News :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Conference Paves Way for Jewish-Christian Cooperation on Temple Mount

By Adam Eliyahu Berkowitz December 5, 2018 , 1:17 pm

In the days to come, The Mount of Hashem’s House Shall stand firm above the mountains And tower above the hills; And all the nations Shall gaze on it with joy. Isaiah 2:2 (The Israel Bible™) The first Temple Jerusalem Convention took place at the Menachem Begin Heritage Center on Wednesday, aimed toward educating Christians about the relevance of the Jewish Temples to their belief. The focus is not only on the Biblical Temples but also on the future Third Temple written about in prophecies. In his opening address, John Enarson, the Christian Relations Director of Cry for Zion and co-organizer of the conference explained the ground rules for the conference. “The conference will be a meeting place of Jews and Christians with different perspectives. This should be done with mutual respect, acknowledging differences, and finding common ground on important issues without signing up for any political or religious position. We ask that all participants show grace toward each other.” Doron Keidar, one of the organizers and the executive director of Cry for Zion, has high hopes for the event. “This is like the first Zionist conference which brought people together to talk about their hopes and dreams for a Jewish state,” Keidar told Breaking Israel News. “That led to the establishment of the modern state of Israel. We are bringing people together to talk about the Temple Mount. It is pretty clear what can come from this.” Rabbi Tuly Weisz, head of Israel365, addressed the crowd, emphasizing that it was powerfully appropriate for such a gathering to be held during the Jewish holiday of Hanukkah. “Many Jewish holidays are about ‘they tried to kill us, we survived, let’s eat,’” Weisz jokingly told the crowd. “But Hanukkah is different. The Greeks did not want to kill us. The focal point of the holiday is about the non-Jews preventing the Jews from connecting to the Torah and about the Greeks defiling the temple. It is entirely appropriate to join in with Christians who have come to Israel to honor the Temple, the Torah, and the Jewish people.” “If you were the Gentiles back then, there would never have been a need for Hanukkah,” Rabbi Weisz concluded. The conference focused on a theory that is gaining popularity which claims that the Jewish Temples did not stand on the Temple Mount. According to the theory, both Temples were located further south in an area now recognized by archaeologists as the City of King David. This theory was most recently put forth in a series of books written by Bob Cornuke, a former police investigator with no training in archaeology. Cornuke has also proposed that the Ark of the Covenant was taken out of Solomon’s Temple and has been hidden away in a church in Ethiopia for hundreds of years. Several of the speakers addressed this theory. Harry Moskoff, the author of the A.R.K. report, discussed the archaeological proof of the Temples’ location as well as the lack of proof for the theory’s claims. Enarson believes the theory hides an insidious theological agenda. “Rejecting the Temple Mount is the last stand of Replacement Theology,” Enarson explained to Breaking Israel News in an interview in April. “Replacement Theology, a belief that Christianity replaced Judaism in the covenant between Abraham and God, was a core tenet of Christianity. Subsequent to, and because of, the Holocaust, some mainstream Christian theologians and denominations have rejected Replacement Theology.”

https://www.breakingisraelnews.com/118146/jewish-christian-cooperation-temple/ 

:: 12-6-18 The Washington Times :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

'Snaketivity' display by Satanic Temple installed at Illinois Capitol rotunda for holiday season

By Douglas Ernst - The Washington Times - Wednesday, December 5, 2018

Visitors to the Illinois Capitol rotunda this month will have a chance to see a “Snaketivity” display near a Nativity scene, a menorah, and other holiday decorations. Supporters of The Satanic Temple were thrilled this week when The Land of Lincoln installed its “Snaketivity” sculpture, which reads: “Knowledge is the greatest gift.” A sign in the rotunda informs visitors that denying such a display would violate the law. “The State of Illinois is required by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution to allow temporary, public displays in the state capitol so long as these displays are not paid for by taxpayer dollars,” the sign reads, NPR reported Tuesday. “Because the first floor of the Capitol Rotunda is a public place, state officials cannot legally censor the content of speech or displays. The United States Supreme Court has held that public officials may legally impose reasonable time, place and manner restrictions regarding displays and speeches, but no regulation can be based on the content of the speech.” “Beautiful! I want one for my house,” one person replied on the group’s Facebook page. (Click here for full article)

:: 12-4-18 Charisma News :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

Public School Bans All Christmas Songs That Mention Jesus

3:00PM EST 12/4/2018 Todd Starnes

At Robious Middle School it's okay to sing about Rudolph and Frosty, but it's not okay to sing about the little Lord Jesus. Parents at the Virginia school received an email recently alerting them that Christmas songs mentioning Jesus would no longer be permitted. If that doesn't jingle your bells I don't know what will, folks. David Allen told television station WWBT that he received an email from the school's chorus teacher explaining that the school had decided to avoid singing "anything of a direct sacred nature in order to be more sensitive to the increasing diverse population at the school." "I'm trying to rationalize how you can encourage diversity and yet be exclusionary in one specific area," Allen told the television station. First Liberty Institute, one of the nation's top law firms handling religious liberty cases, said it is permissible under the U.S. Constitution for public school choirs to perform sacred music. "Federal courts have upheld the constitutionality of public school holiday programs that include the use of religious music, art or drama, so long as the material is presented in an objective manner 'as a traditional part of the cultural and religious heritage of the particular holiday,'" First Liberty attorney Michael Berry wrote in a letter to the Chesterfield County School District. Berry went on to cite several federal court rulings that indicate warbling "Joy to the World" and "Silent Night" do not violate the Establishment Clause. Putting legal precedent aside, let's be honest, folks—Jesus is the reason for the season. Todd Starnes is host of "Fox News & Commentary," heard on hundreds of radio stations. Sign up for his American Dispatch newsletter, be sure to join his Facebook page and follow him on Twitter. His latest book is The Deplorables' Guide to Making America Great Again.

:: 12-4-18 Christian Headlines :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

'In God We Trust' Makes a Return to Schools, Public Buildings One State at a Time

Sarah Curlee | Crosswalk.com | Tuesday, December 4, 2018

Laws were passed earlier in 2018 that required or allowed schools, as well as other public buildings, to openly display “In God We Trust.” Florida is just one of the states in which these laws were passed. An article from CBN News reports that the same law was also passed for Arizona, which allowed their schools to display the state’s motto - “God Enriches” - in English, which can be seen in Latin on the Grand Canyon state seal. At this time, even more state legislatures are seeking to represent the presence of the Lord on their schools and public buildings. A few state lawmakers are even trying to permit or call for the Ten Commandments to be posted in schools and in other public places. In November, voters in Alabama passed an initiative allowing the Ten Commandments to be displayed on state property. Those in support of the initiative would like for it to become law and, if challenged, the conservative majority on the Supreme Court would give it the seal of approval. Back in 2017, Arkansas passed a law that was much like the one passed in Florida. Jim Dotson, Arkansas state Rep., sponsored the measure that called for the posting of "In God We Trust" in each and every school classroom. Following this, he has continued to help other lawmakers create laws that are similar in purpose. "Our history and our heritage is incredibly important, making sure that we as a nation remember our roots, remember where we came from," Dotson informed The Washington Post. "America is an exceptional nation. It's the greatest nation in the history of this planet. Obviously, that success is attributed not just to individuals but probably some higher power than ourselves." Florida state Rep. Kimberly Daniels (D-Jacksonville), who sponsored the bill to get "In God We Trust" in all public schools in The Sunshine State, spoke with CBN News in February, saying, "I believe with all the negativity going on, our children need to know the foundation of what this country is all about and what it was founded on." "God is positive; I put that forth like that because people want to make God a negative thing; God is good," Daniels explained. "And God is the Creator; He's the Initiator; He's the Alpha; He's the Omega, and our children need to see that because the eyes are the gateway to the soul." "And so they need to see that symbol, and it needs to be imprinted in their minds and in their hearts what it meant to the people who came to this country for religious liberty," she mentioned. One particularly powerful supporter of the passing of the bill is 17-year-old Mei-Link Ho-Shing, a survivor of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting spree that occurred earlier this year. She told The Post, "It's powerful because it reassures people of faith."

:: 12-6-18 Washington Examininer :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::

US conducts 'Open Skies' overflight of Ukraine, in message to Moscow

by Jamie McIntyre | December 06, 2018 10:43 AM

The U.S. has conducted an overflight of Ukraine, under the terms of a 16-year-old arms control treaty, aimed at sending a symbolic message to Moscow, the Pentagon said Thursday. “Today, the United States and Allies conducted an extraordinary flight under the Open Skies Treaty,” said a statement, released on the Pentagon’s website. “The timing of this flight is intended to reaffirm U.S. commitment to Ukraine and other partner nations.” The description of the flight as “extraordinary” refers to the fact it was not previous scheduled or announced, an official said. observation plane, did not fly over Crimea or any contested or Russian-controlled areas of Ukraine, the official confirmed. The overflight was requested under the terms of the 2002 Open Skies Treaty by the Arms Control Directorate of the Ukrainian General Staff, said Eric Pahon, a Pentagon spokesman. On board were observers from the U.S., Canada, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Romania, and Ukraine. In its statement, the Pentagon said the U.S. remains “resolute in our support for the security of European nations,” and it called Russia's seizure of Ukrainian naval vessels in the Black Sea near the Kerch Strait “a dangerous escalation in a pattern of increasingly provocative and threatening activity.” The Open Skies flight, with 25 U.S. military personnel on board, departed Joint Base Andrews on Nov. 30, traveled to Ramstein Air Base, Germany, and flew over Ukraine Thursday. “The United States seeks a better relationship with Russia, but this cannot happen while its unlawful and destabilizing actions continue in Ukraine and elsewhere,” the Pentagon said. The 2002 Treaty on Open Skies establishes a regime of flights over the territories of its signatories and is designed to promote openness and transparency in military activities through reciprocal unarmed observation flights.

etc. truly darkness, darkness is growing darker and darker and darker, war is being prepared, war is being made ready. Watch Russia, watch Turkey, watch China, watch Iran, watch Pakistan, watch Saudi Arabia, for they are not your friends nor have they ever been your friends.  They are not my friends, saith your Father God, for they shall wage war against me in the last days, these are the last days. etc.. 

[ :: 4-9-07 pm service  (first word)  :: ::  :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::  ::  ::  ::  ::  :: ::  :: :: :: ::  ::]

etc.. Evil will be all around fighting, and wars, etc..

^{[ :: 10-3-12 pm service (first word) :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::]}

^{etc. But it is a very, very dark hour, a very wicked hour, a very evil hour with much going on every day, every moment of the day. You see it not maybe here in the sense that others are seeing it around the world. But I say unto you, open your spiritual eyes, open your spiritual eyes, see, see, see what is taking place. etc..}